Comparison of the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mississippi River and the Yolo Bypass, Sacramento River

Abstract

The Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway (BP-NMF) and the Yolo Bypass, located on the Mississippi and Sacramento rivers, respectively, are agriculture areas that were once each part of vast wetlands but are now intermittently used for flood control. Here the similarity stops, the BP-NMF has been used to convey floodwaters only twice in nearly 80 years, while the Yolo Bypass is used for this purpose on average every other year. The consequences are greatly different. In 2011, the BP-NMF was activated through the explosive detonation of the ‘fuse plug” portion of its levees, resulting in elevated property and economic damages, crop losses, and litigation. High-energy flows following the opening of the BP-NMF scour coarse sediment in the vicinity of the opening of the BP-NMF and deposit this material within the floodway, including on agricultural fields. In general the environment of much of the BP-NMF provides poor wildlife habitat. In contrast, the routine operation of Yolo Bypass is expected, avoids damage and litigation, supplies organic-rich sediment to fields, and provides good wildlife habitat. The difference between the two systems is attributed to a better approximation of natural conditions on the Yolo Bypass.

Keywords

New Madrid Floodway / Yolo Bypass / flood control

References

[1] CA-DWR (State of California, Department of Water Resources), 2010. Sacramento River Flood Control Project Weirs and Relief Structures—Fact Sheet. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA

[2] Camillo C. A. Divine Providence: The 2011 Flood in the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project, 2012 Vicksburg, Mississippi: Mississippi River Commission

[3] Criss R. E. Criss R. E., Wilson D. A. Character and Origin of Flood Waters. At the Confluence: Rivers, Floods, and Water Quality in the St. Louis Region, 2003 St. Louis: MBG Press, 75-87.

[4] Heitmeyer M. St. Johns and New Madrid Floodway Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Assessment of Historic Land Cover for the SJBNMF Region, 2010

[5] Joiner J. Swamps to Cotton, Rural Missouri, 2010

[6] Kelley R. Battling the Inland Sea, 1998 Oakland, California: University of California Press

[7] Mississippi River Commission (MRC), 2008. The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project: Bird Point-New Madrid Floodway—Information Paper. [2015-12-21]. http://www.mvd.usace.army.mil/Portals/52/docs/Birds%20Point-New%20Madrid%20info%20paper%20FINAL%200426.pdf

[8] Mississippi River Commission (MRC), 2013. Protecting the Alluvial Empire—The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project

[9] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2012a. United States Flood Loss Report—Water Year 2011

[10] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2012b. Spring 2011 Middle and Lower Mississippi, River Valley Floods

[11] Risk Management Solutions Inc., 2007. The 1927 Great Mississippi Flood: 80-Year Retrospective. Newark, CA

[12] Sommer T. R., Harrell W. C., Nobriga M. L. Habitat Use and Stranding Risk of Juvenile Chinook Salmon on a Seasonal Floodplain. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2005, 25(4): 1493-1504.

[13] Sommer T. R., Harrell W. C., Nobriga M. L., . California’s Yolo Bypass: Evidence that Flood Control can be Compatible with Fisheries, Wetlands, Wildlife, and Agriculture, Fisheries, 2001 Bethesda, MD: merican Fisheries Society

[14] US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1985. Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, MO—Final Informational Technical Report: Structural Alternatives. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi

[15] US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2006. St. Johns and New Madrid Floodway Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway Operation— Appendix K. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi

[16] US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2012. Mississippi River and Tributaries—2011 Post-Flood Report. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi

[17] US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2013. Phase 1 Informational Technical Report: Non-Explosive Alternatives for the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi

[18] Walker B. Statement to the Mississippi River Commission on Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway Operation, 2012

[19] Whipple A. A., Grossinger R. M., Rankin D., . Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Historical Ecology Investigation: Exploring Pattern and Process, 2012