Application of advection-diffusion routing model to flood wave propagation: A case study on Big Piney River, Missouri USA

Abstract

Flood wave propagation modeling is of critical importance to advancing water resources management and protecting human life and property. In this study, we investigated how the advection-diffusion routing model performed in flood wave propagation on a 16 km long downstream section of the Big Piney River, MO. Model performance was based on gaging station data at the upstream and downstream cross sections. We demonstrated with advection-diffusion theory that for small differences in watershed drainage area between the two river cross sections, inflow along the reach mainly contributes to the downstream hydrograph’s rising limb and not to the falling limb. The downstream hydrograph’s falling limb is primarily determined by the propagated flood wave originating at the upstream cross section. This research suggests the parameter for the advectiondiffusion routing model can be calibrated by fitting the hydrograph falling limb. Application of the advection diffusion model to the flood wave of January 29, 2013 supports our theoretical finding that the propagated flood wave determines the downstream cross section falling limb, and the model has good performance in our test examples.

Keywords

advection-diffusion equation / hydrograph / flood wave propagation / recession limb

References

[1] Adamowski J. F. Development of a Short-Term River Flood Forecasting Method for Snowmelt Driven Floods Based on Wavelet and Cross-Wavelet Analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 353(3): 247-266.

[2] Andrews E. D. Effective and Bankfull Discharges of Streams in the Yampa River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming. Journal of Hydrology, 1980, 46(3): 311-330.

[3] Biggin D. S. A Comparison of ERS-1 Satellite Radar and Aerial Photography for River Flood Mapping. Water and Environment Journal, 1996, 10(1): 59-64.

[4] Brakenridge G. R., Nghiem S. V., Anderson E., . Space-Based Measurement of River Runoff. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2005, 86(19): 185-188.

[5] Brutsaert W. Hydrology: An Introduction, 2005 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[6] Burn D. H. Perceptions of Flood Risk: A Case Study of the Red River Flood of 1997. Water Resources Research, 1999, 35(11): 3451-3458.

[7] Campolo M., Andreussi P., Soldati A. River Flood Forecasting with a Neural Network Model. Water Resources Research, 1999, 35(4): 1191-1197.

[8] Cao Z. X., Yue Z. Y., Pender G. Landslide Dam Failure and Flood Hydraulics. Part II: Coupled Mathematical Modelling. Natural Hazards, 2011, 59(2): 1021-1045.

[9] Criss R. E., Winston W. E. Properties of a Diffusive Hydrograph and the Interpretation of Its Single Parameter. Mathematical Geosciences, 2008, 40(3): 313-325.

[10] Criss R. E., Osburn G. R., House R. S. The Ozark Plateaus: Missouri, in Caves and Karst of the USA, 2009 Huntsville AL: National Speleological Society

[11] Di Baldassarre G., Montanari A. Uncertainty in River Discharge Observations: A Quantitative Analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2009, 13(6): 913-921.

[12] Gillham R. W., Sudicky E. A., Cherry J. A., . An Advection-Diffusion Concept for Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Unconsolidated Geological Deposits. Water Resources Research, 1984, 20(3): 369-378.

[13] Järvelä J. Flow Resistance of Flexible and Stiff Vegetation: A Flume Study with Natural Plants. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 269(1): 44-54.

[14] Kirchner J. W., Feng X. H., Neal C. Catchment-Scale Advection and Dispersion as a Mechanism for Fractal Scaling in Stream Tracer Concentrations. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 254(1–4): 82-101.

[15] Kumar A., Jaiswal D. K., Kumar N. Analytical Solutions to One-Dimensional Advection-diffusion Equation with Variable Coefficients in Semi-Infinite Media. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 380(3): 330-337.

[16] Liu Y. B., Gebremeskel S., De Smedt F., . A Diffusive Transport Approach for Flow Routing in GISBased Flood Modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 283(1–4): 91-106.

[17] McDonnell J. J., Beven K. Debates—The Future of Hydrological Sciences: A (common) Path Forward? A Call to Action Aimed at Understanding Velocities, Celerities and Residence Time Distributions of the Headwater Hydrograph. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(6): 5342-5350.

[18] Meire D., De Doncker L., Declercq F., . Modelling River-Floodplain Interaction during Flood Propagation. Natural Hazards, 2010, 55(1): 111-121.

[19] Middelmann-Fernandes M. H. Flood Damage Estimation beyond Stage-Damage Functions: An Australian Example. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2010, 3(1): 88-96.

[20] Milzow C., Kinzelbach W. Accounting for Subgrid Scale Topographic Variations in Flood Propagation Modeling Using MODFLOW. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46 10 W10521

[21] Saint-Venant B. Theory of Unsteady Water Flow, with Application to River Floods and to Propagation of Tides in River Channels. French Academy of Science, 1871, 73: 148-154.

[22] Sakkas J. G., Strelkoff T. Dimensionless Solution of Dam-Break Flood Waves. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 1976, 102(2): 171-184.

[23] Singh V. P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, 1995 Highlands Ranch, Colo: Water Resources Publications.

[24] Vineyard J. D., Feder G. L. Springs of Missouri: Revised Edn, 1982 Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources

[25] Wurbs R. A., James W. P. Water Resources Engineering, 2002 New Jersey: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River

[26] Yang Y., Endreny T. A. Watershed Hydrograph Model Based on Surface Flow Diffusion. Water Resources Research, 2013, 49(1): 507-516.

[27] Yen B. C., Tsai C. W. S. On Noninertia Wave versus Diffusion Wave in Flood Routing. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 244(1): 97-104.

[28] Younis J., Anquetin S., Thielen J. The Benefit of High-Resolution Operational Weather Forecasts for Flash Flood Warning. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2008, 12(4): 1039-1051.