Statistics of evolving populations and their relevance to flood risk
Robert E. Criss
Journal of Earth Science ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1) : 2-8.
Statistics of evolving populations and their relevance to flood risk
Statistical methods are commonly used to evaluate natural populations and environmental variables, yet these must recognize temporal trends in population character to be appropriate in an evolving world. New equations presented here define the statistical measures of aggregate historical populations affected by linear changes in population means and standard deviations. These can be used to extract the statistical character of present-day populations, needed to define modern variability and risk, from tables of historical data that are dominated by measurements made when conditions were different. As an example, many factors such as climate change and in-channel structures are causing flood levels to rise, so realistic estimation of future flood levels must take such secular changes into account. The new equations provide estimates of water levels for “100-year” floods in the USA Midwest that are 0.5 to 2 m higher than official calculations that routinely assume population stationarity. These equations also show that flood levels will continue to rise by several centimeters per year. This rate is nearly ten times faster than the rise of sea level, and thus represents one of the fastest and most damaging rates of change that is documented by robust data.
flood risk / statistical theory / Mississippi River
|
|
|
|
|
FEMA, 2011. Flood Insurance Rate Map, City of St. Louis, Missouri. Map Number 2903850068C, May 24, 2011
|
FEMA, 2006. Flood Insurance Rate Map, Jefferson County, Missouri. Map Number 29099C0025E, April 5, 2006
|
FEMA, 2009. Flood Insurance Rate Map, Alexander County, Illinois. Map Number 17003C0220E, May 4, 2009
|
FEMA, 2013. Flood Insurance Rate Maps, Various Sites and Years. [2013-10-12]. https://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10001&storeId=servlet/10001&categoryId=12001&langId=-&userType=G&type=1
|
|
GAO, 1995. Midwest Flood, Information of the Performance, Effects, and Control of Levees, GAO/RCED-95-125, Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
|
|
NWS, 2013. Flood Loss Data. [2013-10-12]. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/hic/
|
|
|
USACE, 2004. Upper Mississippi River System Flow Frequency Study: Final Report. [2013-10-12]. http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/pdw/pdf/FlowFrequency/flowfreq.html
|
USACE, 2013a. Mississippi River Basin-Historic Data. [2013-10-12]. http://mvs-wc.mvs.usace.army.mil/archive/mi.html
|
USACE, 2013b. Water Levels of Rivers and Lakes. [2013-10-12]. http://rivergages.mvr.usace.army.mil/WaterControl/new/lay out.cfm
|
USACE, 2013c. Flow Frequency Query: Upper Mississippi River. [2013-10-12]. http://rivergages.mvr.usace.army.mil/flow_freq/flow_freq.cfm
|
USGS, 1981. Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency. Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Bulletin #17B of the Hydrology Subcommittee. U.S. Department of Geological Survey, Office of Water Data Coordination Reston, Virginia
|
USGS, 2013}. Peak Streamflow for the Nation. [2013-10-12]. http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/pea
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |