Approach to the relation of mutual-feed joint-variation in groundwater management model

Abstract

In groundwater management, the exchanges between groundwater and other water such as surface water and spring water need to be considered. Some exchange is dependent on the groundwater level, which is called covariate. The pumping rate, groundwater level, and covariate interact and the relation of mutual-feed joint-variation is used to describe their interaction. This article presents a new approach of dealing with the relation in groundwater management model. The mathematical formulation of the relation, as an additional equality constraint in the optimization model, is developed using response matrix method. Thereby the groundwater management model with covariate is set up. The code for the simulation and management of groundwater system with covariate is programmed with Fortran 90, and the optimal pumping rate, groundwater level, and covariate are obtained. The approach is verified with a hypothetical case. Finally, the approach is applied to the groundwater management of Qianguo (前郭) area in western Jilin (吉林) Province. The results indicate that the approach is feasible. It provides a universal solution for various covariates and reduces the computational complexity compared to iteration method. The approach is proven to be very efficient to solve groundwater management problem with covariate.

Keywords

covariate / relation of mutualfeed joint-variation / groundwater management / response matrix

References

[1] Ahlfeld, D. P., Minihane, M. R., 2002. Numerical Issues in Management of Stream/Aquifer Interactions. In: Hassanizadeh, S. M., Schotting, R. J., Gray, W. G., et al., eds., Proc. of the XIV International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources. Delft, Netherlands. 1471–1478

[2] Aguado E., Remson I.. Ground-Water Hydraulics in Aquifer Management. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 1974, 100(1): 103-118.

[3] Barlow P. M., Ahlfeld D. P., Dickerman D. C.. Conjunctive-Management Models for Sustained Yield of Stream-Aquifer Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2003, 129(1): 35-48.

[4] Basagaoglu H., Marino M. A.. Joint Management of Surface and Ground Water Supplies. Ground Water, 1999, 37(2): 214-222.

[5] Bredehoeft J. D., Reichard E. G., Gorelick S. M.. El-Kadi A.. If It Works, Don’t Fix It: Benefits from Regional Groundwater Management. Groundwater Models for Resource Analysis and Management, 1995, New York: CRC Press/Lewis Publishing Co. 101 121

[6] Chen C. X., Tang Z. H.. Numerical Method of Groundwater Flow Problem, 1990, Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press

[7] Deininger R. A.. Systems Analysis of Water Supply Systems. Water Resources Bulletin, 1970, 6(4): 573-579.

[8] de Lange W. J.. A Cauchy Boundary Condition for the Lumped Interaction between an Arbitrary Number of Surface Waters and a Regional Aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 226: 250-261.

[9] Gharbi A., Peralta R. C.. Integrated Embedding Optimization Applied to Salt Lake Valley Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 1994, 30(3): 817-832.

[10] Lall U.. Yield Model for Screening Surface- and Ground-Water Development. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1995, 121(1): 9-22.

[11] Lall U., Lin Y. C.. A Groundwater Management Model for Salt Lake County, Utah with Some Water Rights and Water Quality Considerations. Journal of Hydrology, 1991, 123(3–4): 367-393.

[12] Lu W. X.. An Approach for Disposing Karstic Springs in the Management Model of Karstic Water System of North China. Journal of Changchun University of Earth Sciences, 1994, 24(1): 57-59.

[13] Mueller F. A., Male J. W.. A Management Model for Specification of Groundwater Withdrawal Permits. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29(5): 1359-1368.

[14] Peralta R. C., Datta B.. Reconnaissance-Level Alternative Optimal Ground-Water Use Strategies. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1990, 116(5): 676-692.

[15] Psilovikos A.. Response Matrix Minimization Used in Groundwater Management with Mathematical Programming: A Case Study in a Transboundary Aquifer in Northern Greece. Water Resources Management, 2006, 20: 277-290.

[16] Reichard E. G.. Groundwater-Surface Water Management with Stochastic Surface Water Supplies: A Simulation Optimization Approach. Water Resources Research, 1995, 31(11): 2845-2865.

[17] Rejani R., Jha M. K., Panda S. N.. Simulation-Optimization Modelling for Sustainable Groundwater Management in a Coastal Basin of Orissa, India. Water Resources Management, 2009, 23: 235-263.

[18] Restrepo J. I., Montoya A. M., Obeysekera J.. A Wetland Simulation Model for the MODFLOW Groundwater Model. Ground Water, 1998, 36(5): 764-770.

[19] Rodríguez L. B., Cello P. A., Vionnet C. A.. Modeling Stream-Aquifer Interactions in a Shallow Aquifer, Choele Choel Island, Patagonia, Argentina. Hydrogeology Journal, 2006, 14: 591-602.

[20] Takahashi S., Peralta R. C.. Optimal Perennial Yield Planning for Complex Nonlinear Aquifers: Methods and Examples. Advances in Water Resources, 1995, 18: 49-62.

[21] Wagner B. J.. Recent Advances in Simulation-Optimization Groundwater Management Modeling. Reviews of Geophysics, 1995, 33(S1): 1021-1028.

[22] Xue Y. Q., Xie C. H.. Numerical Simulation of Groundwater, 2007, Beijing: Science Press