Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui River watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck region
Chong Xu , Xiwei Xu , Fuchu Dai , Jianzhang Xiao , Xibin Tan , Renmao Yuan
Journal of Earth Science ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1) : 97 -120.
Tens of thousands of landslides were triggered by May 12, 2008 earthquake over a broad area. The main purpose of this article is to apply and verify earthquake-triggered landslide hazard analysis techniques by using weight of evidence modeling in Qingshui (清水) River watershed, Deyang (德阳) City, Sichuan (四川) Province, China. Two thousand three hundred and twenty-one landslides were interpreted in the study area from aerial photographs and multi-source remote sensing imageries post-earthquake, verified by field surveys. The landslide inventory in the study area was established. A spatial database, including landslides and associated controlling parameters that may have influence on the occurrence of landslides, was constructed from topographic maps, geological maps, and enhanced thematic mapper (ETM+) remote sensing imageries. The factors that influence landslide occurrence, such as slope angle, aspect, curvature, elevation, flow accumulation, distance from drainages, and distance from roads were calculated from the topographic maps. Lithology, distance from seismogenic fault, distance from all faults, and distance from stratigraphic boundaries were derived from the geological maps. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was extracted from ETM+ images. Seismic intensity zoning was collected from Wenchuan (汶川) Ms8.0 Earthquake Intensity Distribution Map published by the China Earthquake Administration. Landslide hazard indices were calculated using the weight of evidence model, and landslide hazard maps were calculated from using different controlling parameters cases. The hazard map was compared with known landslide locations and verified. The success accuracy percentage of using all 13 controlling parameters was 71.82%. The resulting landslide hazard map showed five classes of landslide hazard, i.e., very high, high, moderate, low, and very low. The validation results showed satisfactory agreement between the hazard map and the existing landslides distribution data. The landslide hazard map can be used to identify and delineate unstable hazard-prone areas. It can also help planners to choose favorable locations for development schemes, such as infrastructural, buildings, road constructions, and environmental protection.
Wenchuan earthquake / landslides / weight of evidence / Geographic Information Systems (GIS) / landslide hazard mapping
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Bai, S. B., Wang, J., Lu, G. N., et al., 2008. GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Comparisons of Results from Machine Learning Methods Process versus Logistic Regression in Bailongjiang River Basin, China. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10: EGU2008-A-06367 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Begueria, S., Lorente, A., 2002. Landslide Hazard Mapping by Multivariate Statistics: Comparison of Methods and Case Study in the Spanish Pyrenees. http://en.scientificcommons.org/23860600 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Gallus, D., Abecker, A., Richter, D., 2008. Classification of Landslide Susceptibility in the Development of Early Warning Systems. Symposium on Headway in Spatial Data Handling, Montpellier, France. 55–75 |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Guzzetti, F., 2003. Landslide Hazard Assessment and Risk Evaluation: Limits and Prospective. In: Proceedings of the 4th EGS Plinius Conference Held at Mallorca, Spain, October 2002. 4 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
van Westen, C. J., 2004. Geo-Information Tools for Landslide Risk Assessment: An Overview of Recent Developments. In: Lacerda, W. A., Ehrlich, M., Fontoura, S. A. B., et al., eds., Landslides: Evaluation and Stabilization—Glissement de Terrain: Evaluation et Stabilisation: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Landslides. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 39–56 |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |