Investigation of the Co-seismic gravity field variations caused by the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake using monthly GRACE data

Abstract

Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observations have been used to detect the co-seismic and post-seismic gravity field variations due to the M _w=9.3 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake that occurred on December 26, 2004. This article focuses on investigating some gravitational effects caused by this huge earthquake. We computed the geoid height changes, the equivalent water height (EWH) changes, and the gravity changes using the GRACE Level-2 monthly spherical harmonic (SH) solutions released by University of Texas Center for Space Research (UTCSR). The GRACE results agree well with the prediction by a dislocation model and are consistent with the results obtained by some previous scholars. In particular, we calculated the three components of the gravity gradient variations and found that they can recover the seismic-related signature more sensitively due to a certain degree of amplification of the signals. A positive-negative-positive mode predominates in the spatial distribution of the horizontal components of the gravity gradient variations, which is possibly attributed to the anomalies in the crustal density distribution caused by the uplift-subduction effect of the dip-slip earthquake. Moreover, the latitude components of the gravity gradient changes show strong suppression of the north-south stripes, which is due to the along-orbit measurements of the two GRACE satellites. We conclude that the positive-negative-positive mode in latitude gravity gradient changes would be a more sensitive feature to detect the deformations of some major dip-slip earthquakes by GRACE data.

Keywords

satellite geodesy / time-variable gravity / gravity gradient change / dislocation model / Sumatra-Andaman earthquake

References

Bettadpur S.. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Level-2 Gravity Field Product User Handbook, 2007, Austin: Cent. for Space Res., Univ. of Tex. 327 734

Chambers D. P.. Observing Seasonal Steric Sea Level Variations with GRACE and Satellite Altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 2006, 111 C03010

Chen, J., 2007. Preliminary Result of the Sep. 12, 2007 Sumatra Earthquake. Available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2007/us2007hear/finite_fault.php

Chen J. L., Wilson C. R., Tapley B. D., . GRACE Detects Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation from the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2007, 34 L13302

Cheng M., Tapley B. D.. Variations in the Earth’s Oblateness during the Past 28 Years. J. Geophys. Res., 2004, 109 B09402

de Linage C., Rivera L., Hinderer J., . Separation of Coseismic and Postseismic Gravity Changes for the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake from 4.6 yr of GRACE Observations and Modelling of the Coseismic Change by Normal-Modes Summation. Geophys. J. Int., 2009, 176(3): 695-714.

Einarsson I., Hoechner A., Wang R., . Gravity Changes due to the Sumatra-Andaman and Nias Earthquakes as Detected by the GRACE Satellites: A Reexamination. Geophys. J. Int., 2010, 183(2): 733-747.

Guo J. Y., Duan X. J., Shum C. K.. Non-isotropic Gaussian Smoothing and Leakage Reduction for Determining Mass Changes over Land and Ocean Using GRACE Data. Geophys. J. Int., 2010, 181(1): 290-302.

Han S. C., Shum C. K., Bevis M., . Crustal Dilatation Observed by GRACE after the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake. Science, 2006, 313(5787): 658-662.

Hoechner A., Babeyko A. Y., Sobolev S. V.. Enhanced GPS Inversion Technique Applied to the 2004 Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2008, 35 8 L08310

Jekeli C.. Alternative Methods to Smooth the Earth’s Gravity Field, 1981, Columbus, Ohio: Dep. of Geod. Sci. and Surv., Ohio State Univ.

Ogawa R., Heki K.. Slow Postseismic Recovery of Ge oid Depression Formed by the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake by Mantle Water Diffusion. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2007, 34 6 L06313

Panet I., Mikhailov V., Diament M., . Coseismic and Post-Seismic Signatures of the Sumatra 2004 December and 2005 March Earthquakes in GRACE Satellite Gravity. Geophys. J. Int., 2007, 171(1): 177-190.

Sun W. K., Okubo S., Fu G. Y., . General Formulations of Global Co-seismic Deformations Caused by an Arbitrary Dislocation in a Spherically Symmetric Earth Model-Applicable to Deformed Earth Surface and Space-Fixed Point. Geophys. J. Int., 2009, 177(3): 817-833.

Sun W. K., Fu G. Y., Okubo S.. Co-seismic Gravity Changes Computed for a Spherical Earth Model Applicable to GRACE Data. Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 2010, 135: 11-17.

Swenson S., Wahr J.. Post-Processing Removal of Correlated Errors in GRACE Data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006, 33 8 L08402

Tapley B. D., Bettadpur S., Ries J., . GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System. Science, 2004, 305(5683): 503-505.

Wahr J., Molenaar M., Bryan F.. Time Variability of the Earth’s Gravity Field: Hydrological and Oceanic Effects and Their Possible Detection Using GRACE. J. Geophys. Res., 1998, 103(B12): 30205-30229.

Wahr J., Swenson S., Zlotnicki V., . Time-Variable Gravity from GRACE: First Results. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2004, 31 L11501

Wang R. J.. The Dislocation Theory: A Consistent Way for Including the Gravity Effect in (Visco)Elastic Plane-Earth Models. Geophys. J. Int., 2005, 161(1): 191-196.

Wang R. J., Lorenzo-Martín F., Roth F.. PSGRN/PSCMP—A New Code for Calculating Co- and Post-Seismic Deformation, Geoid and Gravity Changes Based on the Viscoelastic-Gravitational Dislocation Theory. Computers & Geosciences, 2006, 32(4): 527-541.