The cambrian substrate revolution and early evolution of the phyla

David J. Bottjer

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (Suppl 1) : 21-24.

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (Suppl 1) : 21-24. DOI: 10.1007/s12583-010-0160-7
Article

The cambrian substrate revolution and early evolution of the phyla

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Evidence from Precambrian carbonate and siliciclastic sedimentary structures indicates that in marine settings before the Cambrian conditions of seafloor environments were largely controlled by microbes and the mats which they form. During the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition, a vertical component to marine bioturbation evolved, as well as overall increased seafloor bioturbation. The “Cambrian substrate revolution (CSR)” encompasses the evolutionary and ecological effects that occurred due to these substrate changes. The continued evolution of bioturbating organisms caused the development of a significant variety of new microenvironments, which led to the formation of new ecospace and evolutionary opportunities for other benthic organisms. Numerous studies have evaluated the “weird” morphology of early seafloor animals and how they adapted to an increasingly bioturbated substrate. Many early animals adapted to seafloors with strong microbial mat development are stem groups of the phyla we recognize today, and thus have morphological features absent in modern representatives. Fossils of crown groups of modern phyla first began to appear in the Cambrian and subsequently dominated Phanerozoic bioturbated seafloor environments. The CSR is thus a primary component of the evolution of stem and crown groups of the phyla during the Cambrian explosion.

Keywords

Cambrian substrate revolution / Cambrian explosion / stem group / crown group / bioturbation / Ediacaran

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
David J. Bottjer. The cambrian substrate revolution and early evolution of the phyla. Journal of Earth Science, 2010, 21(Suppl 1): 21‒24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-010-0160-7

References

Bottjer D. J., Davidson E. H., Peterson K. J., . Paleogenomics of Echinoderms. Science, 2006, 314: 956-960.
CrossRef Google scholar
Bottjer D. J., Hagadorn J. W., Dornbos S. Q.. The Cambrian Substrate Revolution. GSA Today, 2000, 10: 1-7.
Brysse K.. From Weird Wonders to Stem Lineages: The Second Reclassification of the Burgess Shale Fauna. Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci., 2008, 39: 298-313.
CrossRef Google scholar
Chen J. Y., Bottjer D. J., Li G., . Complex Embryos Displaying Bilaterian Characters from Precambrian Doushantuo Phosphate Deposits, Weng’an, Guizhou, China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106: 19056-19060.
CrossRef Google scholar
Dornbos S. Q.. Evolutionary Paleoecology of Early Epifaunal Echinoderms: Response to Increasing Bioturbation Levels during the Cambrian Radiation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2006, 237: 225-239.
CrossRef Google scholar
Dornbos S. Q., Bottjer D. J.. Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Earliest Echinoderms: Helicoplacoids and the Cambrian Substrate Revolution. Geology, 2000, 28: 839-842.
CrossRef Google scholar
Gehling J. G.. Microbial Mats in Terminal Proterozoic Siliciclastics: Ediacaran Death Masks. Palaios, 1999, 14: 40-57.
CrossRef Google scholar
Hagadorn J. W., Bottjer D. J.. Wrinkle Structures: Microbially Mediated Sedimentary Structures Common in Subtidal Siliciclastic Settings at the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic Transition. Geology, 1997, 25: 1047-1050.
CrossRef Google scholar
Hagadorn J. W., Bottjer D. J.. Restriction of a Late Neoproterozoic Biotope: Suspect-Microbial Structures and Trace Fossils at the Vendian-Cambrian Transition. Palaios, 1999, 14: 73-85.
CrossRef Google scholar
Love G. D., Grosjean E., Stalvies C., . Fossil Steroids Record the Appearance of Demospongiae during the Cryogenian Period. Nature, 2009, 457: 718-721.
CrossRef Google scholar
Marshall C. R.. Explaining the Cambrian “Explosion” of Animals. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science, 2006, 34: 355-384.
CrossRef Google scholar
McIlroy D., Logan G. A.. The Impact of Bioturbation on Infaunal Ecology and Evolution during the Proterozoic-Cambrian Transition. Palaios, 1999, 14: 58-72.
CrossRef Google scholar
Peterson K. J., Cotton J. A., Gehling J. G., . The Ediacaran Emergence of Bilaterians: Congruence between the Genetic and the Geological Fossil Records. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2008, 363: 1435-1443.
CrossRef Google scholar
Seilacher A.. Biomat-Related Lifestyles in the Precambrian. Palaios, 1999, 14: 86-93.
CrossRef Google scholar
Seilacher A., Pflüger F.. Krumbein W. E., Paterson D. M., Stal L. J.. From Biomats to Benthic Agriculture: A Biohistoric Revolution. Biostabilization of Sediments, 1994, Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheks Und Infomationssystem Der Carl Von Ossietzky Universität 97 105
Valentine, J. W., 2004. On the Origin of Phyla. University of Chicago Press, 614
Xiao S., Laflamme M.. On the Eve of Animal Radiation: Phylogeny, Ecology and Evolution of the Ediacara Biota. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2008, 24: 31-40.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zhang X. G., Siveter D. J., Waloszek D., . An Epipodite-Bearing Crown-Group Crustacean from the Lower Cambrian. Nature, 2007, 449: 595-598.
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/