Three-dimensional modeling of shallow shear-wave velocities for Las Vegas, Nevada, using sediment type

Barbara Luke, Helena Murvosh, Wanda Taylor, Jeff Wagoner

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2009, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 555-562.

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2009, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 555-562. DOI: 10.1007/s12583-009-0046-8
Article

Three-dimensional modeling of shallow shear-wave velocities for Las Vegas, Nevada, using sediment type

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A three-dimensional model of near-surface shear-wave velocity in the deep alluvial basin underlying the metropolitan area of Las Vegas, Nevada (USA), is being developed for earthquake site response projections. The velocity dataset, which includes 230 measurements, is interpolated across the model using depth-dependent correlations of velocity with sediment type. The sediment-type database contains more than 1 400 well and borehole logs. Sediment sequences reported in logs are assigned to one of four units. A characteristic shear-wave velocity profile is developed for each unit by analyzing closely spaced pairs of velocity profiles and well or borehole logs. The resulting velocity model exhibits reasonable values and patterns, although it does not explicitly honor the measured shear-wave velocity profiles. Site response investigations that applied a preliminary version of the velocity model support a two-zone ground-shaking hazard model for the valley. Areas in which clay predominates in the upper 30 m are predicted to have stronger ground motions than the rest of the basin.

Keywords

shear-wave velocity / earthquake site response / site amplification / microzonation / sediment type

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Barbara Luke, Helena Murvosh, Wanda Taylor, Jeff Wagoner. Three-dimensional modeling of shallow shear-wave velocities for Las Vegas, Nevada, using sediment type. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20(3): 555‒562 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-009-0046-8

References

Abrahamson N., Atkinson G., Boore D., . Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24: 45-66.
CrossRef Google scholar
Asten, M. W., Boore, D. M., 2005. Blind Comparisons of Shear-Wave Velocities at Closely-Spaced Sites in San Jose, California. Open-File Report 2005-1169, US Geological Survey
Building Safety Council NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1. Provisions, FEMA 368, 2000, Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency
Gazetas G.. Discussion of “Evaluation of In Situ Effective Shear Modulus from Dispersion Measurements” by C. Vrettos and B. Prange. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 118: 1120-1122.
CrossRef Google scholar
Langenheim V. E., Grow J. A., Jachens R. C., . Geophysical Constraints on the Location and Geometry of the Las Vegas Valley Shear Zone, Nevada. Tectonics, 2001, 20(2): 189-209.
CrossRef Google scholar
Idriss I. M., Sun J. I.. User’s Manual for SHAKE91: A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits, 1992, Davis, California: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California
Liu Y., Luke B., Pullammanappallil S., . Boulanger R. W., Dewwolkar M., Gucunski N., . Combining Active- and Passive-Source Measurements to Profile Shear Wave Velocities for Seismic Microzonation. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2005, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers 14
Louie J. N.. Faster, Better: Shear-Wave Velocity to 100 Meters Depth from Refraction Microtremor Arrays. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2001, 91(2): 347-364.
CrossRef Google scholar
Louie J. N.. Earthquake Hazard Class Mapping by Parcel in Unincorporated Urban Clark County. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2008, 40(1): 72
Luke B., Calderón-Macías C.. Inversion of Seismic Surface Wave Data to Resolve Complex Profiles. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(2): 155-165.
CrossRef Google scholar
Luke B., Liu Y.. Effect of Sediment Column on Weak-Motion Site Response for a Deep Basin Fill. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1399-1413.
CrossRef Google scholar
Luke B., Liu Y.. Site Response Zones and Short-Period Earthquake Ground Motion Projections for the Las Vegas Basin. Journal of Earth System Science, 2008, 117(S2): 757-772.
CrossRef Google scholar
Rodgers A., Tkalcic H., McCallen D., . Site Response in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada from NTS Explosions and Earthquake Data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2006, 163(1): 55-80.
CrossRef Google scholar
Scott J., Rasmussen T., Luke B., . Shallow Shear Velocity and Seismic Microzonation of the Urban Las Vegas, Nevada Basin. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006, 96(3): 1068-1077.
CrossRef Google scholar
Stokoe K. H. II, Wright S. G., Bay J. A., . Woods R. D., . Characterization of Geotechnical Sites by SASW Method. Geophysical Characterization of Sites, 1994, New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing Company 15-25.
Werle J., Luke B.. Puppala A. J., Hudyma N., Likos W. J.. Engineering with Heavily Cemented Soils in Las Vegas, Nevada. Problematic Soils and Rocks and In Situ Characterization, 2007, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. 9

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/