Exploiting lateral resolution of near-surface seismic refraction methods

Abstract

The 1D τ-p inversion algorithm is widely employed to generate starting models with most computer programs that implement refraction tomography. However, this algorithm emphasizes the vertical resolution of many layers, and as a result, it frequently fails to detect even large lateral variations in seismic velocities, such as the decreases that are indicative of shear zones. This study presents a case that demonstrates the failure of the 1D τ-p inversion algorithm to define or even detect a major shear zone that is 50 m or ten stations wide. Furthermore, the majority of refraction tomography programs parameterize the seismic velocities within each layer with vertical velocity gradients. By contrast, the 2D generalized reciprocal method (GRM) inversion algorithms emphasize the lateral resolution of individual layers. This study demonstrates the successful detection and definition of the 50-m wide shear zone with the GRM inversion algorithms. The existence of the shear zone is corroborated by a 2D analysis of the head wave amplitudes and by numerous closely spaced orthogonal seismic profiles carried out as part of a later 3D refraction investigation. Furthermore, a 1D analysis of the head wave amplitudes indicates that a reversal in the seismic velocities, rather than vertical velocity gradients, occurs in the weathered layers. While all seismic refraction operations should aim to provide as accurate depth estimates as is practical, the major conclusion reached in this study is that refraction inversion algorithms that emphasize the lateral resolution of individual layers generate more useful results for geotechnical and environmental applications. The advantages of the improved lateral resolution are obtained with 2D profiles in which the structural features can be recognized from the magnitudes of the variations in the seismic velocities. Furthermore, the spatial patterns obtained with 3D investigations facilitate the recognition of structural features that do not display any intrinsic variation or “signature” in seismic velocities.

Keywords

amplitude / GRM / near-surface / refraction convolution section / resolution / seismic refraction / 2D / 3D

References

[1] Aki K., Richards P. G.. Quantitative Seismology, 2002, New York: University Science Books

[2] Barton P., Barker N.. Velocity Imaging by Tau-p Transformation of Refracted Seismic Traveltimes. Geophysical Prospecting, 2003, 51: 195-203.

[3] Berry M. J.. Depth Uncertainties from Seismic First-Arrival Refraction Studies. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1971, 76(26): 6464-6468.

[4] Červený V., Ravindra R.. Theory of Seismic Head Waves, 1971, Toronto: University of Toronto Press

[5] Chopra S., Marfurt K. J.. Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and Reservoir Characterization, 2007, Tulsa: SEG

[6] de Franco R.. Multi-refractor Imaging with Stacked Refraction Convolution Section. Geophysical Prospecting, 2005, 53(3): 335-348.

[7] Domzalski W.. Some Problems of Shallow Refraction Investigations. Geophysical Prospecting, 1956, 4(2): 140-166.

[8] Drijkoningen G. G.. The Usefulness of Geophone Ground-Coupling Experiments to Seismic Data. Geophysics, 2000, 65(6): 1780-1787.

[9] Hagedoorn J. G.. Templates for Fitting Smooth Velocity Functions to Seismic Refraction and Reflection Data. Geophysical Prospecting, 1955, 3: 325-338.

[10] Hagedoorn J. G.. The Plus-Minus Method of Interpret ing Seismic Refraction Sections. Geophysical Prospecting, 1959, 7(2): 158-182.

[11] Hagiwara T., Omote S.. Land Creep at Mt Tyausu-Yama (Determination of Slip Plane by Seismic Prospecting). Tokyo University Earthquake Research Institute Bulletin, 1939, 17: 118-137.

[12] Hawkins L. V.. The Reciprocal Method of Routine Shallow Seismic Refraction Investigations. Geophysics, 1961, 26: 806-819.

[13] Healy J. H.. Crustal Structure along the Coast of California from Seismic-Refraction Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1963, 68(20): 5777-5787.

[14] Ivanov J., Miller R. D., Xia J., . The Inverse Problem of Refraction Travel Times, Part I: Types of Geophysical Nonuniqueness through Minimization. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2005, 162(3): 447-459.

[15] Ivanov J., Miller R. D., Xia J., . The Inverse Problem of Refraction Travel Times, Part II: Quantifying Refraction Nonuniqueness Using a Three-Layer Model. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2005, 162(3): 461-477.

[16] Lanz E., Maurer H., Green A. G.. Refraction Tomography over a Buried Waste Disposal Site. Geophysics, 1998, 63(4): 1414-1433.

[17] Menke W.. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, 1989, London: Academic Press

[18] Merrick N. P., Odins J. A., Greenhalgh S. A.. A Blind Zone Solution to the Problem of Hidden Layers within a Sequence of Horizontal or Dipping Refractors. Geophysical Prospecting, 1978, 26: 703-721.

[19] Nettleton L. L.. Geophysical Prospecting for Oil, 1940, New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company

[20] Oldenburg D. W.. An Introduction to Linear Inverse Theory. Trans. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1984, GE-22(6): 665-674.

[21] Palmer, D., 1980. The Generalized Reciprocal Method of Seismic Refraction Interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104

[22] Palmer D.. An Introduction to the Generalized Reciprocal Method of Seismic Refraction Interpretation. Geophysics, 1981, 46: 1508-1518.

[23] Palmer D.. Refraction Seismics: The Lateral Resolution of Structure and Seismic Velocity, 1986, London: Geophysical Press

[24] Palmer D.. The Resolution of Narrow Low-Velocity Zones with the Generalized Reciprocal Method. Geophysical Prospecting, 1991, 39(8): 1031-1060.

[25] Palmer D.. Is Forward Modeling as Efficacious as Minimum Variance for Refraction Inversion?. Exploration Geophysics, 1992, 23: 261-266.

[26] Palmer D.. Imaging Refractors with the Convolution Section. Geophysics, 2001, 66: 1582-1589.

[27] Palmer D.. Resolving Refractor Ambiguities with Amplitudes. Geophysics, 2001, 66(5): 1590-1593.

[28] Palmer D.. Measurement of Rock Fabric in Shallow Refraction Seismology. Exploration Geophysics, 2001, 32: 907-914.

[29] Palmer, D., 2003. Application of Amplitudes in Shallow Seismic Refraction Inversion. 16th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide (Abstract)

[30] Palmer D.. Refraction Traveltime and Amplitude Corrections for Very Near-Surface Inhomogeneities. Geophysical Prospecting, 2006, 54(5): 589-604.

[31] Palmer D.. Xu Y. X., Xia J. H.. Non-Uniqueness in Near-Surface Refraction Inversion. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Wuhan, China, 2008, Beijing: Science Press 42-54.

[32] Palmer D.. Xu Y. X., Xia J. H.. Is It Time to Re-engineer Geotechnical Seismic Refraction Methods?. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Wuhan, China, 2008, Beijing: Science Press 29-41.

[33] Palmer, D., 2009. Integrating Short and Long Wavelength Time and Amplitude Statics. First Break (Preprint)

[34] Palmer D., Jones L.. A Simple Approach to Refraction Statics with the Generalized Reciprocal Method and the Refraction Convolution Section. Exploration Geophysics, 2005, 36(1): 18-25.

[35] Palmer D., Nikrouz R., Spyrou A.. Statics Corrections for Shallow Seismic Refraction Data. Exploration Geophysics, 2005, 36: 7-17.

[36] Palmer D., Shadlow J.. Integrating Long and Short Wavelength Statics with the Generalized Reciprocal Method and the Refraction Convolution Section. Exploration Geophysics, 2008, 39: 139-147.

[37] Ruijtenberg P. A., Buchanan R., Marke P.. Sheriff R. E.. Three-Dimensional Data Improve Reservoir Mapping. Reservoir Geophysics, 1992, Tulsa: SEG 122-130.

[38] Schuster G. T., Quintus-Bosz A.. Wavepath Eikonal Traveltime Inversion: Theory. Geophysics, 1993, 58: 1314-1323.

[39] Sjögren B.. A Brief Study of the Generalized Reciprocal Method and Some Limitations of the Method. Geophysical Prospecting, 2000, 487: 815-834.

[40] Slichter L. B.. The Theory of the Interpretation of Seismic Travel-Time Curves in Horizontal Structures. Physics., 1932, 3: 273-295.

[41] Stefani J. P.. Turning-Ray Tomography. Geophysics, 1995, 60: 1917-1929.

[42] Treitel S., Lines L.. Geophysical Examples of Inversion (with a Grain of Salt). The Leading Edge, 1988, 7(11): 32-35.

[43] Whiteley R. J.. Electrical and Seismic Response of Shallow Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Ore Deposits: [Dissertation], 1986, Sydney: University of New South Wales 393

[44] Whiteley R. J., Greenhalgh S. A.. Velocity Inversion and the Shallow Seismic Refraction Method. Geoexploration, 1979, 17: 125-141.

[45] Zhang J., Toksöz M. N.. Nonlinear Refraction Traveltime Tomography. Geophysics, 1998, 63(5): 1726-1737.

[46] Zhu X., Sixta D. P., Andstman B. G.. Tomostatics: Turning-Ray Tomography + Static Corrections. The Leading Edge, 1992, 11(12): 15-23.