Investigation on identification of structural anomalies from polluted data sets using an unsupervised learning method

Abstract

Civil infrastructure is prone to structural damage due to high geo-stress and other natural disasters, so monitoring is required. Data collected by structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are easily affected by many factors, such as temperature, sensor fluctuation, sensor failure, which can introduce a lot of noise, increasing the difficulty of structural anomaly identification. To address this problem, this paper designs a new process of structural anomaly identification under noisy conditions and offers Civil Infrastructure Denoising Autoencoder (CIDAE), a denoising autoencoder-based deep learning model for SHM of civil infrastructure. As a case study, the effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by experiments on deformation stress data of the Wuhan Yangtze River Tunnel based on finite element simulation. Investigation of the circumferential weld and longitudinal weld data of the case study is also conducted. It is concluded that CIDAE is superior to traditional methods.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

structural health monitoring / deep learning / anomaly detection

References

[1] Bado M F, Casas J R. A review of recent distributed optical fiber sensors applications for civil engineering structural health monitoring. Sensors, 2021, 21(5): 1818–1901

[2] Bao Y, Li H. Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring, 2021, 20(4): 1353–1372

[3] Chen J, Jiang X, Yan Y, Lang Q, Wang H, Ai Q. Dynamic warning method for structural health monitoring data based on arima: Case study of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao bridge immersed tunnel. Sensors, 2022, 22(16): 6185–6202

[4] Hou R, Xia Y. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2021, 491: 115741

[5] ChenH P. Structural Health Monitoring of Large Civil Engineering Structures. CSU Academic Report, 2018

[6] Entezami A, Sarmadi H, Saeedi Razavi B. An innovative hybrid strategy for structural health monitoring by modal flexibility and clustering methods. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2020, 10(5): 845–859

[7] Cao P, Qi S, Tang J. Structural damage identification using piezoelectric impedance measurement with sparse inverse analysis. Smart Materials and Structures, 2018, 27(3): 035020

[8] Moore E Z, Nichols J M, Murphy K D. Model-based SHM: Demonstration of identification of a crack in a thin plate using free vibration data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2012, 29: 284–295

[9] Xu L, Wang K, Yang X, Su Y, Yang J, Liao Y, Zhou P, Su Z. Model-driven fatigue crack characterization and growth prediction: A two-step, 3-d fatigue damage modeling framework for structural health monitoring. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, 195: 106226

[10] Malekloo A, Ozer E, AlHamaydeh M, Girolami M. Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and high-dimensional data source highlights. Structural Health Monitoring, 2022, 21(4): 1906–1955

[11] Mosavi A A, Dickey D, Seracino R, Rizkalla S. Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2012, 26: 254–267

[12] Xiao S, Li S. LSSVM-based approach for refining soil failure criteria and calculating safety factor of slopes. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(7): 871–881

[13] TibaduizaDTorres-ArredondoM AVitolaJAnayaMPozoF. A damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learning. Complexity, 2018, 5081283

[14] Sheikh Khozani Z, Khosravi K, Torabi M, Mosavi A, Rezaei B, Rabczuk T. Shear stress distribution prediction in symmetric compound channels using data mining and machine learning models. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 1097–1109

[15] Mai H V T, Nguyen M H, Trinh S H, Ly H B. Optimization of machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(2): 284–305

[16] WangZChaY J. Unsupervised machine and deep learning methods for structural damage detection: A comparative study. Engineering Reports, 2022, e12551

[17] Ye X W, Jin T, Yun C B. A review on deep learning-based structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Smart Structures and Systems, 2019, 24(5): 567–585

[18] JansenAGeißlerK. Multi-feature anomaly detection for structural health monitoring of a road bridge using an autoencoder. In: 10th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure–SHMII. 2021, 10

[19] MoallemiABurrelloABrunelliDBeniniL. Model-based vs. data-driven approaches for anomaly detection in structural health monitoring: A case study. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC). New York: IEEE, 2021

[20] Shu X, Bao T, Zhou Y, Xu R, Li Y, Zhang K. Unsupervised dam anomaly detection with spatial-temporal variational autoencoder. Structural Health Monitoring, 2023, 22(1): 39–55

[21] Cha Y J, Choi W, Büyüköztürk O. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2017, 32(5): 361–378

[22] Chiaia B, Marasco G, Aiello S. Deep convolutional neural network for multi-level non-invasive tunnel lining assessment. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 214–223

[23] Bao Y, Tang Z, Li H, Zhang Y. Computer vision and deep learning-based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring, 2019, 18(2): 401–421

[24] Huang H B, Yi T H, Li H N. Anomaly identification of structural health monitoring data using dynamic independent component analysis. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2020, 34(5): 04020025

[25] Wang Z, Cha Y J. Unsupervised deep learning approach using a deep auto-encoder with a one-class support vector machine to detect damage. Structural Health Monitoring, 2021, 20(1): 406–425

[26] Cha Y J, Wang Z. Unsupervised novelty detection-based structural damage localization using a density peaks-based fast clustering algorithm. Structural Health Monitoring, 2018, 17(2): 313–324

[27] Favarelli E, Testi E, Giorgetti A. The impact of sensing parameters on data management and anomaly detection in structural health monitoring. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2022, 12(6): 1–13

[28] Yan S, Shao H, Xiao Y, Liu B, Wan J. Hybrid robust convolutional autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection of machine tools under noises. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2023, 79: 102441

[29] Mostafavi A, Cha Y J. Deep learning-based active noise control on construction sites. Automation in Construction, 2023, 151: 104885

[30] Cha Y J, Mostafavi A, Benipal S S. Benipal. Dnoisenet: Deep learning-based feedback active noise control in various noisy environments. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 121: 105971

[31] Krasichkov A S, Grigoriev E B, Bogachev M I, Nifontov E M. Shape anomaly detection under strong measurement noise: An analytical approach to adaptive thresholding. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2015, 92(4): 042927

[32] Raginsky M, Willett R M, Horn C, Silva J, Marcia R F. Sequential anomaly detection in the presence of noise and limited feedback. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, 58(8): 5544–5562

[33] VincentPLarochelleHBengioYManzagolP A. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. New York: ACM, 2008, 1096–1103

[34] Tan X, Chen W, Tan X, Zou T, Du B. Prediction for the future mechanical behavior of underwater shield tunnel fusing deep learning algorithm on shm data. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 125: 104504

[35] ZhouBLiuSHooiBChengXYeJ. Beatgan: Anomalous rhythm detection using adversarially generated time series. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-19. San Mateo: IJCAI, 2019, 4433–4439

[36] Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1933, 24(6): 417–441

[37] Rumelhart D, Hinton G E, Williams R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 1986, 323(6088): 533–536

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press