Experimental and numerical investigation of the flexural performance of channel steel-bolt joint for prefabricated subway stations

Lei WANG , Shengyang ZHOU , Xiangsheng CHEN , Xian LIU , Shuya LIU , Dong SU , Shouchao JIANG , Qikai ZHU , Haoyu YAO

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6) : 918 -935.

PDF (18318KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6) : 918 -935. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-024-1068-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Experimental and numerical investigation of the flexural performance of channel steel-bolt joint for prefabricated subway stations

Author information +
History +
PDF (18318KB)

Abstract

Flexural performance of joints is critical for prefabricated structures. This study presents a novel channel steel-bolt (CB) joint for prefabricated subway stations. Full-scale tests are carried out to investigate the flexural behavior of the CB joint under the design loads of the test-case station. In addition, a three dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model of the CB joint is established, incorporating viscous contact to simulate the bonding and detachment behaviors of the interface between channel steel and concrete. Based on the 3D FE model, the study examines the flexural bearing mechanism and influencing factors for the flexural performance of the CB joint. The results indicate that the flexural behavior of the CB joint exhibits significant nonlinear characteristics, which can be divided into four stages. To illustrate the piecewise linearity of the bending moment-rotational angle curve, a four-stage simplified model is proposed, which is easily applicable in engineering practice. The study reveals that axial force can enhance the flexural capacity of the CB joint, while the preload of the bolt has a negligible effect. The flexural capacity of the CB joint is approximate twice the value of the designed bending moment, demonstrating that the joint is suitable for the test-case station.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

channel steel-bolt joint / flexural performance / full-scale test / numerical simulation / prefabricated subway station

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lei WANG, Shengyang ZHOU, Xiangsheng CHEN, Xian LIU, Shuya LIU, Dong SU, Shouchao JIANG, Qikai ZHU, Haoyu YAO. Experimental and numerical investigation of the flexural performance of channel steel-bolt joint for prefabricated subway stations. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(6): 918-935 DOI:10.1007/s11709-024-1068-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Liu M, Jia S, Liu X. Evaluation of mitigation potential of GHG emissions from the construction of prefabricated subway station. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 236: 117700

[2]

Mao C, Shen Q, Shen L, Tang L. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects. Energy and Building, 2013, 66: 165–176

[3]

Tao L, Ding P, Shi C, Wu X, Wu S, Li S. Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 102994

[4]

He H, Li Z, Ma S, Cui X. Effect of strata restraint on seismic performance of prefabricated sidewall joints in fabricated subway stations. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(5): 763–779

[5]

Tao L, Shi C, Ding P, Yang X, Bao Y, Wang Z. Shaking table test of the effect of an enclosure structure on the seismic performance of a prefabricated subway station. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 125: 104533

[6]

Feng S, Guo Z, Liu Y, Pan Q, Xu J, Wang G, Xing Q. Study on seismic behaviors of joints between sidewalls and floors for precast subway stations. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 54(01): 259–268

[7]

Mai J, Mo N, Wan J, He G, Ren H. Seismic performance analysis of assembled metro stations. Building Structure., 2022, 52(S1): 1707–1710

[8]

Chen J N, Xu C S, El Naggar H M, Du X L. Study on seismic performance and index limits quantification for prefabricated subway station structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 162: 107460

[9]

ChenJDu XXuCLiuHJiangJ LiuD. Seismic vulnerability evaluation of rectangular prefabricated subway station structure based on IDA method. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(7): 37−46

[10]

Yuan Q, Liang F, Wang R. Analytical approach for segmental tunnels considering nonlinear longitudinal joints in soft soils. Transportation Geotechnics, 2022, 36: 100807

[11]

Zhang L, Feng K, Li M R, Sun Y P, He C, Xiao M Q. Analytical method regarding compression-bending capacity of segmental joints: Theoretical model and verification. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 93: 103083

[12]

Tao L, Shi C, Ding P, Li S, Wu S, Bao Y. A study on bearing characteristic and failure mechanism of thin-walled structure of a prefabricated subway station. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(3): 359–377

[13]

Qiu T, Su D, Chen X, Chen K, Shen J, Wang L, Zheng Z. A novel interfaces contact model for analyzing assembled joints of prefabricated underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 133: 104936

[14]

Liu X, Zhang C, Zhang C, Yuan Y. Ultimate load-carrying capacity of the longitudinal joints in segmental tunnel linings. Structural Concrete, 2017, 18(5): 693–709

[15]

Yang X, Lin F, Huang M. Experimental research on bending bearing capability of grouted double mortise-tenon joint for prefabricated metro station structure. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021: 6635409

[16]

Yang X, Lin F. Prefabrication technology for underground metro station structure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 108: 103717

[17]

Ding P, Tao L, Yang X, Zhao J, Shi C. Three-dimensional dynamic response analysis of a single-ring structure in a prefabricated subway station. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 45: 271–286

[18]

Ye L, Ding X, Xiang B, Zhao W, Wu J, Ou F, Zan Z. Bending performance of CHC steel-concrete combined joint in underground prefabricated metro station. Urban Mass Transit., 2022, 25(4): 120–124

[19]

Yang Y, Liao S, Liu M, Wu D, Pan W, Li H. A new construction method for metro stations in dense urban areas in Shanghai soft ground: Open-cut shafts combined with quasi-rectangular jacking boxes. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 125: 104530

[20]

Zhang M, Liu Y, Fan L, Li P. Performance of constructing a double-deck subway station by combining the shield method and cavern–pile method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 67: 120–131

[21]

Wang Z W, Fei J B, Ma W B, Chen X S. Full-scale loading experiments on performance of UHPC joints for prefabricated mountain tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 131: 104784

[22]

Feng K, He C, Qiu Y, Zhang L, Wang W, Xie H, Zhang Y, Cao S. Full-scale tests on bending behavior of segmental joints for large underwater shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 75: 100–116

[23]

Ding W, Gong Y, Qiao Y, Gong C. Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of segmental joint under combined loading of compression-bending-shear. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103346

[24]

Zuo L B, Li G H, Feng K, Ma X C, Zhang L, Qiu Y, Cao S, Feng L. Experimental analysis of mechanical behavior of segmental joint for gas pipeline shield tunnel under unfavorable compression-bending loads. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 77: 227–236

[25]

Zhang D, Zhang B, Luo T, Zhang D, Li B. Full-scale testing and numerical modelling of segmental-joint performance with corroded bolt. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 119: 104260

[26]

Zhang L, Feng K, He C, Yang W, Zhang J, Xiao M. Numerical investigation of the compression-bending stiffness of segmental joints with different types of joint surfaces. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 132: 104898

[27]

Ding W, Chen X, Jin Y, Qiao Y. Flexural behavior of segmental joint containing double rows of bolts: Experiment and simulation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 112: 103940

[28]

Chen R, Chen S, Wu H, Liu Y, Meng F. Investigation on deformation behavior and failure mechanism of a segmental ring in shield tunnels based on elaborate numerical simulation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 117: 104960

[29]

Qiu T, Zhang J, Chen X, Xu Z, Su D, Song R, Cui T. Experimental investigation and mechanical model for assembled joints of prefabricated two-wall-in-one diaphragm walls. Engineering Structures, 2023, 275: 115285

[30]

Liu T, Lu J, Wang D, Liu H, Mo N, Zhai L. 3D nonlinear finite element modelling of mechanical behavior of a new wall-beam-strut joint for prefabricated underground construction and validation again experimental testing. Structures, 2021, 33: 3202–3221

[31]

Li S, Lu W, Sun H, Luan Y. Experimental and numerical research on fabricated joint for CFST set in underground construction. Structures, 2021, 34: 1291–1299

[32]

Hung H, Sung Y, Lin K, Jiang C, Chang K. Experimental study and numerical simulation of precast segmental bridge columns with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 2017, 136: 12–25

[33]

Guo W, Feng K, Zhou Y, Yang W, Lu X, Xiao M, He C. Full-scale test and numerical modeling on deformation and damage behavior of segmental joints under ultimate compression-bending load. Engineering Structures, 2023, 279: 115648

[34]

Wang L, Chen X, Su D, Liu S, Liu X, Jiang S, Gao H, Yang W. Mechanical performance of a prefabricated subway station structure constructed by twin closely-spaced rectangular pipe-jacking boxes. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 135: 105062

[35]

Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Onate E. A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299–326

[36]

Lee J H, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892–900

[37]

Su D, Chen W, Wang X, Huang M, Pang X, Chen X. Numerical study on transverse deformation characteristics of shield tunnel subject to local soil loosening. Underground Space, 2022, 7(1): 106–121

[38]

Shen Y, Ling J, Wang W, Zhu H, Yan Z. 3D numerical investigation on response of shield tunnel under combined effects of fire and structural loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 128: 104659

[39]

Zhang Z, Liu W, Huang X, Wang S. Exploring the three-dimensional response of water storage and sewage tunnel based on 3D finite element modeling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 120: 104269

[40]

Su Q, Du X, Li C, Jiang X. Tests of basic physical parameters of steel-concrete interface. Journal of Tongji University, 2016, 44(4): 499–506

[41]

Tao L, Ding P, Yang X, Lin P, Shi C, Bao Y, Wei P, Zhao J. Comparative study of the seismic performance of prefabricated and cast-in-place subway station structures by shaking table test. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103583

[42]

Zhang W, De Corte W, Liu X, Taerwe L. A comparative investigation between the beam spring method and the modified routine method in special-section shield tunnels: A case study for quasi-rectangular tunnels. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2022, 46(9): 1754–1781

[43]

Zhao H, Liu X, Bao Y, Yuan Y. Nonlinear simulation of tunnel linings with a simplified numerical modelling. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2017, 61(5): 593–603

[44]

Li L, Chen K, Wang J, Jiang Z. Parametric structural calculation of shield linings for large-diameter tunnels based on the shell-spring model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 27(6): 2716–2732

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (18318KB)

1854

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/