The shear strength of the interface between artificial rock and printed concrete at super-early ages

Abstract

3D concrete printing has the potential to replace shotcrete for construction of linings of tunnels in hard rock. The shear strength of the interface between rock and printed concrete is vital, especially at super-early ages. However, traditional methods for testing the shear strength of the interface, e.g., the direct shear test, are time-consuming and result in a high variability for fast-hardening printed concrete. In this paper, a new fast bond shear test is proposed. Each test can be completed in 1 min, with another 2 min for preparing the next test. The influence of the matrix composition, the age of the printed matrices, and the interface roughness of the artificial rock substrate on the shear strength of the interface was experimentally studied. The tests were conducted at the age of the matrices at the 1st, the 4th, the 8th, the 16th, the 32nd, and the 64th min after its final setting. A dimensionless formula was established to calculate the shear strength, accounting for the age of the printed matrices, the interface roughness, and the shear failure modes. It was validated by comparing the calculated results and the experimental results of one group of samples.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

rock tunnel / printed concrete / interface / fast bond shear test / shear strength

References

[1] Franzén T. Shotcrete for underground support: A state-of-the-art report with focus on steel-fibre reinforcement. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1992, 7(4): 383–391

[2] Liu G, Cheng W, Chen L. Investigating and optimizing the mix proportion of pumping wet-mix shotcrete with polypropylene fiber. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 150: 14–23

[3] Li P, Zhou Z, Chen L, Liu G, Xiao W. Research on dust suppression technology of shotcrete based on new spray equipment and process optimization. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019: 4831215

[4] Chen L, Sun Z, Liu G, Ma G, Liu X. Spraying characteristics of mining wet shotcrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2022, 316: 125888

[5] Pan G, Li P, Chen L, Liu G. A study of the effect of rheological properties of fresh concrete on shotcrete-rebound based on different additive components. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 224: 1069–1080

[6] Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Lackner R. Stability analysis of shotcrete supported crown of NATM tunnels with discontinuity layout optimization. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 42(11): 1199–1216

[7] Sun Z, Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Mang H A. Stability analysis of a fire-loaded shallow tunnel by means of a thermo-hydro-chemo-mechanical model and discontinuity layout optimization. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2019, 43(16): 2551–2564

[8] Wangler T, Roussel N, Bos F P, Salet T A M, Flatt R J. Digital concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 123: 105780

[9] YuanYWangXTaoY. Bond properties between printable concrete and rock. In: Proceedings of the 5th fib Congress 2018. Ghent: CRC Press, 2018, 2766–2773

[10] Saiang D, Malmgren L, Nordlund E. Laboratory tests on shotcrete-rock joints in direct shear, tension and compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2005, 38(4): 275–297

[11] Tao Y, Lesage K, van Tittelboom K, Yuan Y, de Schutter G. Influence of substrate surface roughness and moisture content on tensile adhesion performance of 3D printable concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 126: 104350

[12] Tao Y, Vantyghem G, Lesage K, Yuan Y, de Corte W, van Tittelboom K, de Schutter G. Adhesion properties of printable polymer-modified concrete for rock tunnel linings. ACI Materials Journal, 2021, 118(6): 61–73

[13] Pichler B, Scheiner S, Hellmich C. From micron-sized needle-shaped hydrates to meter-sized shotcrete tunnel shells: Micromechanical upscaling of stiffness and strength of hydrating shotcrete. Acta Geotechnica, 2008, 3(4): 273–294

[14] Pinto R, Schindler A. Unified modeling of setting and strength development. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(1): 58–65

[15] Mettler L K, Wittel F K, Flatt R J, Herrmann H J. Evolution of strength and failure of SCC during early hydration. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 89: 288–296

[16] Pichler C, Schmid M, Traxl R, Lackner R. Influence of curing temperature dependent microstructure on early-age concrete strength development. Cement and Concrete Research, 2017, 102: 48–59

[17] Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Automation in Construction, 2017, 83: 212–221

[18] Lee T, Lee J. Setting time and compressive strength prediction model of concrete by nondestructive ultrasonic pulse velocity testing at early age. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 252: 119027

[19] Tao Y, Lesage K, van Tittelboom K, Yuan Y, de Schutter G. Twin-pipe pumping strategy for stiffening control of 3D printable concrete: from transportation to fabrication. Cement and Concrete Research, 2023, 168: 107137

[20] Wolfs R, Bos F, Salet T. Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 106: 103–116

[21] Tao Y, Rahul A, Lesage K, van Tittelboom K, Yuan Y, de Schutter G. Mechanical and microstructural properties of 3D printable concrete in the context of the twin-pipe pumping strategy. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 125: 104324

[22] Wang L, Yang Y, Yao L, Ma G. Interfacial bonding properties of 3D printed permanent formwork with the post-casted concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 128: 104457

[23] Zhang Y, Mang H A. Global cracking elements: A novel tool for Galerkin-based approaches simulating quasi-brittle fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2020, 121(11): 2462–2480

[24] Zhang Y, Huang J, Yuan Y, Mang H A. Cracking elements method with a dissipation-based arc-length approach. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2021, 195: 103573

[25] SinghBGoelR. Engineering Rock Mass Classification. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011, 313–317

[26] DavimJ P. Tribology for Engineers: A Practical Guide. Sawston Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2011, 1–14

[27] Myers N. Characterization of surface roughness. Wear, 1962, 5(3): 182–189

[28] XiaCSunZ. The Mechanics of Rock Joints in Engineering. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2002, 18–36

[29] Ma G, Wang L. A critical review of preparation design and workability measurement of concrete material for largescale 3D printing. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 382–400

[30] ISO 9597. Cement test methods-determination of setting time and soundness.Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2008

[31] DL/T5126-2001. Test Code on Polymer-modified Cement Mortar. Beijing: China Electronic Power Press, 2001

[32] GB/T2419-2005. Test Method for Fluidity of Cement Mortar. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2005 (in Chinese)

[33] Paglia C, Wombacher F, Böhni H. The influence of alkali-free and alkaline shotcrete accelerators within cement systems: I. Characterization of the setting behavior. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(6): 913–918

[34] Marchon D, Kawashima S, Bessaies-Bey H, Mantellato S, Ng S. Hydration and rheology control of concrete for digital fabrication: Potential admixtures and cement chemistry. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 112: 96–110

[35] Lee C H, Hover K C. Extracting kinetic parameters from penetration resistance measurements. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 83: 140–151

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press