Reliability mesh convergence analysis by introducing expanded control variates

Alireza GHAVIDEL , Mohsen RASHKI , Hamed GHOHANI ARAB , Mehdi AZHDARY MOGHADDAM

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 1012 -1023.

PDF (1488KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 1012 -1023. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-020-0631-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reliability mesh convergence analysis by introducing expanded control variates

Author information +
History +
PDF (1488KB)

Abstract

The safety evaluation of engineering systems whose performance evaluation requires finite element analysis is a challenge in reliability theory. Recently, Adjusted Control Variates Technique (ACVAT) has proposed by the authors to solve this issue. ACVAT uses the results of a finite element method (FEM) model with coarse mesh density as the control variates of the model with fine mesh and efficiently solves FEM-based reliability problems. ACVAT however does not provide any results about the reliability-based mesh convergence of the problem, which is an important tool in FEM. Mesh-refinement analysis allows checking whether the numerical solution is sufficiently accurate, even though the exact solution is unknown. In this study, by introducing expanded control variates (ECV) formulation, ACVAT is improved and the capabilities of the method are also extended for efficient reliability mesh convergence analysis of FEM-based reliability problems. In the present study, the FEM-based reliability analyses of four practical engineering problems are investigated by this method and the corresponding results are compared with accurate results obtained by analytical solutions for two problems. The results confirm that the proposed approach not only handles the mesh refinement progress with the required accuracy, but it also reduces considerably the computational cost of FEM-based reliability problems.

Keywords

finite element / reliability mesh convergence analysis / expanded control variates

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Alireza GHAVIDEL, Mohsen RASHKI, Hamed GHOHANI ARAB, Mehdi AZHDARY MOGHADDAM. Reliability mesh convergence analysis by introducing expanded control variates. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 1012-1023 DOI:10.1007/s11709-020-0631-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Nowak A S, Collins K R. Reliability of Structures. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000

[2]

Gallimard L. Error bounds for the reliability index in finite element reliability analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2011, 87(8): 781–794

[3]

Ghavidel A, Rashki M, Mousavi S R. The effect of FEM mesh density on the failure probability analysis of structures. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(7): 2371–2383

[4]

Rashki M, Ghavidel A, Ghohani Arab H, Mousavi S R. Low-cost finite element method-based reliability analysis using adjusted control variate technique. Structural Safety, 2018, 75: 133–142

[5]

Javed A, Djijdeli K, Xing J T. A coupled meshfree-mesh-based solution scheme on hybrid grid for flow-induced vibrations. Acta Mechanica, 2016, 227(8): 2245–2274

[6]

Li Z, Wood R. Accuracy verification of a 2D adaptive mesh refinement method for incompressible or steady flow. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2017, 318: 259–265

[7]

Morgan N R, Waltz J I. 3D level set methods for evolving fronts on tetrahedral meshes with adaptive mesh refinement. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 336: 492–512

[8]

Anitescu C, Hossain M N, Rabczuk T. Recovery-based error estimation and adaptivity using high-order splines over hierarchical T-meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 328: 638–662

[9]

Hennig P, Kästner M, Morgenstern P, Peterseim D. Adaptive mesh refinement strategies in isogeometric analysis—A computational comparison. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 316: 424–448

[10]

Ray N, Grindeanu I, Zhao X, Mahadevan V, Jiao X. Array-based, parallel hierarchical mesh refinement algorithms for unstructured meshes. Computer Aided Design, 2017, 85: 68–82

[11]

Bespalov A, Haberl A, Praetorius D. Adaptive FEM with coarse initial mesh guarantees optimal convergence rates for compactly perturbed elliptic problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 317: 318–340

[12]

Rabczuk T, Ren H, Zhuang X. A nonlocal operator method for partial differential equations with application to electromagnetic waveguide problem. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 31–55

[13]

Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359

[14]

Guo H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(2): 433–456

[15]

Weiber S. Residual based error estimate and quasi-interpolation on polygonal meshes for high order BEM-based FEM. Computers & Mathematics with Applications (Oxford, England), 2017, 73(2): 187–202

[16]

Wu J, Zheng H. Uniform convergence of multigrid methods for adaptive meshes. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2017, 113: 109–123

[17]

Liu G R. The smoothed finite element method (S-FEM): A framework for the design of numerical models for desired solutions. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(2): 456–477

[18]

Brambilla P, Brivio P, Guardone A, Romanelli G. Grid convergence assessment for adaptive grid simulations of normal drop impacts onto liquid films in axi-symmetric and three-dimensional geometries. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2015, 267: 487–497

[19]

Lockard D P. In search of grid converged solutions. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 6: 224–233

[20]

Płaszewski P, Banaś K. Performance analysis of iterative solvers of linear equations for Hp-adaptive finite element method. Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 18: 1584–1593

[21]

Jones A C, Wilcox R K. Finite element analysis of the spine: Towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2008, 30(10): 1287–1304

[22]

Hamdia K M, Ghasemi H, Zhuang X, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for flexoelectric nanostructures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 337: 95–109

[23]

Liu P L, Liu K G. Selection of random field mesh in finite element reliability analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1993, 119(4): 667–680

[24]

Manjuprasad M, Manohar C S. Adaptive random field mesh refinements in stochastic finite element reliability analysis of structures. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2007, 19(1): 23–54

[25]

Tracey B, Wolper D. Reducing the error of Monte Carlo algorithms by learning control variates. In: The 29th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Barcelona, 2016

[26]

Rashki M, Miri M, Azhdary Moghaddam M. A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point. Structural Safety, 2012, 39: 22–29

[27]

Arab H G, Rashki M, Rostamian M, Ghavidel A, Shahraki H. Refined first-order reliability method using cross-entropy optimization method. Engineering with Computers, 2018, 35: 1–13

[28]

Green D K E. Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo for combined subset simulation and nonlinear finite element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 313: 337–361

[29]

Megson T H G. Structural and Stress Analysis. 2nd ed. Amsterdam/London: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005

[30]

Clough R W, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993

[31]

Tada H, Paris P C, Irwin G R. The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook. New York: ASME press, 2000

[32]

Bower A F. Applied Mechanics of Solids. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, 2009

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1488KB)

2189

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/