1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China
2. College of Water Resource and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China
mengmq@nwafu.edu.cn
Show less
History+
Received
Accepted
Published Online
2025-12-25
2026-04-12
2026-06-17
PDF
(15562KB)
Abstract
This study employed bio-carbonated reactive magnesia cement (RMC) as a curing agent and polypropylene fibers as reinforcing and toughening materials to prepare fiber-reinforced bio-carbonated RMC fluidized solidified soil. Through flowability tests, rheological tests, triaxial shear tests, and a series of microscopic analyses including scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetry, the study systematically investigated the influence of RMC dosage, liquid-to-solid ratio, fiber content, and fiber length on the material’s workability and shear strength. Results indicate: Increasing RMC content promotes Mg(OH)2 and hydrated magnesia carbonates formation, enhancing shear strength but reducing workability. Increasing the liquid-to-solid ratio improves workability but increases porosity, leading to reduced shear strength; increasing fiber content and length reduces flowability, but the resulting three-dimensional network structure effectively inhibits crack propagation, enhancing material toughness and shear strength. Within the study scope, maximum shear strength was achieved at a fiber content of 0.5% and length of 9 mm. Excessive fiber content or length tends to cause agglomeration, resulting in strength reduction. Microscopic analysis indicates that carbonation products effectively promote bonding between soil particles. This paper offers a theoretical basis for the application of fiber-reinforced bio-carbonated RMC fluidized solidified soil in geotechnical engineering.
Ling T C, Kaliyavaradhan S K, Poon C S. Global perspective on application of controlled low-strength material (CLSM) for trench backfilling—An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 158: 535–548
[2]
Gu Y, Zhang P Y, Dong W T, Sun Q, Yao G, Lv R C. Research on the preparation and properties of GBFS-based mud solidification materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 423: 135900
[3]
Zhu Y P, Liu D R, Fang G W, Wang H, Cheng D. Utilization of excavated loess and gravel soil in controlled low strength material: Laboratory and field tests. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 360: 129604
[4]
Wang Q, Zhang R B, Guo J W, Cai G J, Li Y F. Study on mechanical properties and microstructure of metakaolin-slag-calcium carbide residue synergistic solidifying waste engineering mud. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 438: 137135
[5]
Qian J S, Hu Y Y, Zhang J K, Xiao W X, Ling J M. Evaluation the performance of controlled low strength material made of excess excavated soil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 214: 79–88
[6]
Shigematsu Y, Inazumi S, Hashimoto R, Yamauchi H. Experimental study on properties of liquefied stabilized soil produced with different types of solidifiers and thickeners. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023, 19: e2407
[7]
Shigematsu Y, Inazumi S, Chaiprakaikeow S, Nontananandh S. Properties of high-flowability liquefied stabilized soil made of recycled construction sludge. Recycling, 2023, 8(5): 67
[8]
Ibrahim M, Rahman M K, Najamuddin S K, Alhelal Z S, Acero C E. A review on utilization of industrial by-products in the production of controlled low strength materials and factors influencing the properties. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 325: 126704
[9]
Kaliyavaradhan S K, Ling T C, Guo M Z, Mo K H. Waste resources recycling in controlled low-strength material (CLSM): A critical review on plastic properties. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 241: 383–396
[10]
Xiao R, Nie Q K, Dai X D, Wan Z, Zhong J T, Ma Y T, Huang B S. Developing alkali-activated controlled low-strength material (CLSM) using urban waste glass and red mud for sustainable construction. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 98: 111202
[11]
Wang C H, Li Y D, Wen P H, Zeng W, Wang X Q. A comprehensive review on mechanical properties of green controlled low strength materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 363: 129611
[12]
Zhao G J, Pan X Q, Yan H, Tian J F, Han Y F, Guan H Z, Liu B, Wang S. Utilization of high fine-grained shield tunnel spoil in CLSM and effect of foam agent content on properties. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 423: 135836
[13]
Shi C J, Jiménez A F, Palomo A. New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(7): 750–763
[14]
Choi S G, Chang I, Lee M, Lee J H, Han J T, Kwon T H. Review on geotechnical engineering properties of sands treated by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and biopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 246: 118415
[15]
Barbhuiya S, Bhusan Das B, Adak D. Roadmap to a net-zero carbon cement sector: Strategies, innovations and policy imperatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 359: 121052
[16]
He B, Yue P, Zhu Y Q, Liu H Y, Guo Z, Li Y J. Experimental study on hole erosion behaviors of marine soil solidified by an innovative organic composite material. Applied Ocean Research, 2025, 163: 104755
[17]
Li Y J, Guo Z, Wang L Z, Sun X Y, Zhu Y Q. Numerical analysis of microbially induced calcite precipitation and enzyme induced calcite precipitation in calcareous sand: Multi-process and biochemical reactions. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 17(5): 3225–3242
[18]
Proaño L, Sarmiento A T, Figueredo M, Cobo M. Techno-economic evaluation of indirect carbonation for CO2 emissions capture in cement industry: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 263: 121457
[19]
Amran M, Makul N, Fediuk R, Lee Y H, Vatin N I, Lee Y Y, Mohammed K. Global carbon recoverability experiences from the cement industry. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 17: e01439
[20]
Li Y J, Yue P, Zhu Y, Sun X Y, Guo Z. Field erosion protection of tidal beach: comparison and synergy between sulfide aluminum cementing materials and biomineralization materials. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 21: e04092
[21]
Xiao Y, Wang Y, Desai C S, Jiang X, Liu H L. Strength and deformation responses of biocemented sands using a temperature-controlled method. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 19(11): 04019120
[22]
Fang C L, Achal V. Enhancing carbon neutrality: A perspective on the role of microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). Biogeotechnics, 2024, 2(2): 100083
[23]
Ren G Z, Peng Y, Wu S J, Sun Z C, Fan H H, Zhou M Y. Rheological behavior of biogenic calcium carbonate from high-concentration enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation and the mechanical properties of treated soil. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2026, 18(4): 2945–2959
[24]
Zhang Y, Hu X L, Wang Y J, Jiang N J. A critical review of biomineralization in environmental geotechnics: Applications, trends, and perspectives. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(1): 100003
[25]
Xiao Y, Zhang Z C, Stuedlein A W, Evans T M. Liquefaction modeling for biocemented calcareous sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2021, 147(12): 04021149
[26]
Xiao Y, He X, Stuedlein A W, Chu J, Matthew Evans T, Van Paassen L A. Crystal growth of MICP through microfluidic chip tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2022, 148(5): 06022002
[27]
Kumar D, Sanalkumar K U A, Yang E H. Strain-hardening magnesium-silicate-hydrate composites (SHMSHC) utilizing reactive magnesia cement (MgO) and calcined clay (metakaolin). Cement and Concrete Composites, 2024, 152: 105656
[28]
Ruan S, Unluer C. Comparative life cycle assessment of reactive MgO and Portland cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 137: 258–273
[29]
Unluer C, Al-Tabbaa A. Impact of hydrated magnesium carbonate additives on the carbonation of reactive MgO cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 2013, 54: 87–97
[30]
Hay R, Celik K. Hydration, carbonation, strength development and corrosion resistance of reactive MgO cement-based composites. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 128: 105941
[31]
Hay R, Otchere C, Kashwani G, Celik K. Recycling carbonated reactive magnesium cement (RMC) as a building material. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 320: 128838
[32]
Hoang T, Dung N T, Unluer C, Chu J. Use of microbial carbonation process to enable self-carbonation of reactive MgO cement mixes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 143: 106391
[33]
Grünhäuser Soares E, Castro-Gomes J. Carbonation curing influencing factors of carbonated reactive magnesia cements (CRMC)—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 305: 127210
[34]
Li Y J, Wang L Z, Dong C R, Feng G H, Sun X Y, Guo Z. A coupled mathematical model of microbial grouting reinforced seabed considering the response of wave-induced pore pressure and its application. Computers and Geotechnics, 2025, 184: 107235
[35]
Li Y J, Guo Z, Wang L Z, Zhu Y Q. Numerical study of MICP infiltration and mineralization in unsaturated soils: CaCO3 distribution and critical depth. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2024, 24(11): 04024258
[36]
Wang D L, Tang C S, Pan X H, Dong Z H, Wang R, Zhang J Z, Ji X L, Hu H C, Shi B. Construction and demolition waste stabilization through biocarbonation of reactive magnesia cement: effect of urea concentration. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2025, 37(1): 04024450
[37]
Wang R, Tang C S, Pan X H, Wang D L, Dong Z H, Shi B. Stabilization of dredged sludge using bio-carbonation of reactive magnesia cement method. Acta Geotechnica, 2023, 18(3): 1529–1541
[38]
Wang R, Tang C S, Pan X H, Wang D L, Dong Z H, Lu X C. An efficient bio-stabilization technology with bio-carbonation of reactive magnesia for soil improvement in cold regions. Engineering Geology, 2024, 343: 107779
[39]
Yi Y L, Liska M, Unluer C, Al-Tabbaa A. Carbonating magnesia for soil stabilization. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 50(8): 899–905
[40]
Xiao Y, Fan W J, Fang Q Y, Cui H, Fu G Y, Zhao H H. Undrained shear behaviors of biocemented sand treated through biostimulation approach. Acta Geotechnica, 2025, 20(6): 2573–2582
[41]
Xiao Y, Fan W J, Cui H, Wu B Y, Zhao H H, Fu G Y. Drained shear strength and dilatancy of biocemented soil by biostimulation. Acta Geotechnica, 2025, 20(6): 2683–2693
[42]
Tang C S, Pan X H, Cheng Y J, Ji X L. Improving hydro-mechanical behavior of loess by a bio-strategy. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(2): 100024
[43]
Ni W B, Ren G Z, Zhao C Z, Fan H H, Gao Y, Wang P W, Pang S, Meng M Q. Sandy soil reinforcement using carbonic anhydrase-producing bacterium with crude soybean urease system: Crystallinity optimization and extracellular polymeric substance function. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2025,
[44]
Liu L, Liu H L, Stuedlein A W, Evans T M, Xiao Y. Strength, stiffness, and microstructure characteristics of biocemented calcareous sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, 56(10): 1502–1513
[45]
Benzerara M, Guihéneuf S, Belouettar R, Perrot A. Combined and synergic effect of Algerian natural fibres and biopolymers on the reinforcement of extruded raw earth. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 289: 123211
[46]
Zhang J, Deng A, Jaksa M. Enhancing mechanical behavior of micaceous soil with jute fibers and lime additives. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 13(5): 1093–1100
[47]
Otieno Owino A, Nahar N, Hossain Z, Tamaki N. Dimensional influence of basalt fiber reinforcements on the consolidation behaviour of rice husk ash stabilized soils. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 339: 127686
[48]
Chen C, Zhang G, Zornberg J G, Morsy A M, Huang J. Interface bond behavior of tensioned glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) tendons embedded in cemented soils. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 263: 120132
[49]
Xiao Y, Tong L Y, Che H B, Guo Q W, Pan H S. Experimental studies on compressive and tensile strength of cement-stabilized soil reinforced with rice husks and polypropylene fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 344: 128242
[50]
Silva G, Ñañez R, Zavaleta D, Burgos V, Kim S, Ruiz G, Pando M A, Aguilar R, Nakamatsu J. Eco-friendly additive construction: analysis of the printability of earthen-based matrices stabilized with potato starch gel and sisal fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 347: 128556
[51]
Anggraini V, Asadi A, Huat B B K, Nahazanan H. Effects of coir fibers on tensile and compressive strength of lime treated soft soil. Measurement, 2015, 59: 372–381
[52]
Lei B F, Pang S, Xie F H, Fan H H, Sun J C. Optimization of ratios and strength formation mechanism of fluidized solidified soil from multi-source solid wastes. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 108: 112958
[53]
Liang S H, Xiao X L, Wang J, Wang Y X, Feng D L, Zhu C Y. Influence of fiber type and length on mechanical properties of MICP-treated sand. Materials, 2022, 15(11): 4017
[54]
Rawat V, Satyam N. Enhancing the durability of coastal soil treated with fiber-reinforced microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP). Applied Ocean Research, 2024, 150: 104106
[55]
Ni W B, Ren G Z, Liu C H, Fan H H, Meng M Q, Gao Y, Pang S, Sun Z C, Yang X J. Mechanism of enhanced bio-carbonation in sandy soils through urea pre-hydrolysis: A more efficient optimisation approach. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2026, 14(1): 120568
[56]
Whiffin V S, van Paassen L A, Harkes M P. Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2007, 24(5): 417–423
[57]
Wang D L, Pan X H, Tang C S, Shi M, Wang R, Li L, Dong Z H, Xu J J. On enhancing the mechanical behaviors of bio-carbonation of reactive magnesia cement solidified construction and demolition wastes via fiber reinforcement. Acta Geotechnica, 2025, 20(9): 4535–4552
[58]
Ren G Z, Ji Y Y, Wu S J, Zhang Y G, Fan H H, Chen T, Zhang X Y, Zhang Z, Huo J R. Experimental study on the fluidity and strength of enzyme-assisted MgO fluidized solidified soil. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 23: e05547
[59]
Hopkinson L, Kristova P, Rutt K, Cressey G. Phase transitions in the system MgO–CO2–H2O during CO2 degassing of Mg-bearing solutions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2012, 76: 1–13
[60]
Yao D F, Wu J, Niu S, Gu Z R, Zheng J J, Yan J Y, Xu L, Yang M, Yan Y J. An anionic biopolymer γ-polyglutamate enhanced the microbially induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement: Mechanical behaviors and underlying mechanism. Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17(10): 4485–4496
[61]
Wang D L, Tang C S, Pan X H, Wang R, Shi M, Dong Z H, Zhang Y C, Shi B. A novel bio-carbonation method of reactive magnesia with urea pre-hydrolysis for geomaterial stabilisation. Geotechnique, 2024, 74(13): 1634–1648
[62]
Yang Y, Ruan S Q, Wu S F, Chu J, Unluer C, Liu H L, Cheng L. Biocarbonation of reactive magnesia for soil improvement. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16(4): 1113–1125
[63]
Gautier Q, Bénézeth P, Mavromatis V, Schott J. Hydromagnesite solubility product and growth kinetics in aqueous solution from 25 to 75 °C. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2014, 138: 1–20