Impact resistance of rammed earth: Comparative analysis of cement and alkali-activated slag stabilizers with machine learning predictions

Ali KADKHODAEI , Alireza JAVID , Xiang HE , Vahab TOUFIGH

ENG. Struct. Civ. Eng ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 1590 -1612.

PDF (9327KB)
ENG. Struct. Civ. Eng ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) :1590 -1612. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-026-1322-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Impact resistance of rammed earth: Comparative analysis of cement and alkali-activated slag stabilizers with machine learning predictions
Author information +
History +
PDF (9327KB)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact resistance of rammed earth (RE) materials, unstabilized and stabilized with cement and alkali-activated slag (AAS). Seven RE mix designs were developed, including one unstabilized reference mixture, four cement-stabilized mixtures containing 2.5 wt.%–10 wt.% ordinary Portland cement (Type II), and two AAS-stabilized mixtures incorporating 7.5 wt.% and 10 wt.% ground-granulated blast-furnace slag activated by an alkaline solution of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide (Na2SiO3:NaOH = 2:1 by mass, 12 mol/L NaOH, activator-to-slag ratio = 0.8). All mixes were evaluated for their impact resistance, and physical and mechanical properties. Microstructural analyses were conducted using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction to characterize the internal structure of the materials. The results demonstrate that unstabilized RE exhibits poor impact resistance, failing upon the initial impact during drop-weight tests. Incorporating stabilizers significantly enhances impact resistance, with AAS-stabilized mixtures outperforming cement-stabilized counterparts. Specifically, AAS mixtures showed a 35% improvement in impact resistance compared to cement-stabilized mixtures with the same binder content. Machine learning models, support vector regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and light gradient boosting, have demonstrated the ability to predict impact resistance based on mechanical properties, including compressive strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus, toughness, density, and water absorption. XGB, in particular, achieved a high coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.99 for training data and 0.95 for test data, indicating a strong correlation between these mechanical properties and impact resistance. The study underscores the potential of AAS as a viable alternative to cement in stabilizing RE, contributing to the development of more sustainable construction practices.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

impact resistance / RE / AAS / cement / sustainable construction / machine learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ali KADKHODAEI, Alireza JAVID, Xiang HE, Vahab TOUFIGH. Impact resistance of rammed earth: Comparative analysis of cement and alkali-activated slag stabilizers with machine learning predictions. ENG. Struct. Civ. Eng, 2026, 20 (8) : 1590-1612 DOI:10.1007/s11709-026-1322-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Jaquin P A , Augarde C E , Gerrard C M . Chronological description of the spatial development of rammed earth techniques. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2008, 2(4): 377–400

[2]

Minke G. Building with Earth: Design and Technology of A Sustainable Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2006

[3]

Yetgin Ş , Çavdar Ö , Çavdar A . The effects of the fiber contents on the mechanic properties of the adobes. Construction and Building Materials, 2008, 22(3): 222–227

[4]

Hussaini S M S , Toufigh V . Strength and fracture behavior of rammed-earth materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2019, 31(10): 04019228

[5]

Haddad K , Lannon S , Latif E . Investigation of cob construction: review of mix designs, structural characteristics, and hygrothermal behaviour. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 87: 108959

[6]

Rafi M M , Khan S , Bhutto M A . Experimental assessment of compressive and shear behavior of adobe masonry. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2024, 36(6): 04024131

[7]

Valenzuela M , Ciudad G , Pablo Cárdenas J , Medina C , Salas A , Oñate A , Pincheira G , Attia S , Tuninetti V . Towards the development of performance-efficient compressed earth blocks from industrial and agro-industrial by-products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 194: 114323

[8]

Miccoli L , Müller U , Fontana P . Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 61: 327–339

[9]

Kariyawasam K K G K D , Jayasinghe C . Cement stabilized rammed earth as a sustainable construction material. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 105: 519–527

[10]

Van Damme H , Houben H . Earth concrete. Stabilization revisited. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 114: 90–102

[11]

Morel J C , Mesbah A , Oggero M , Walker P . Building houses with local materials: Means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Building and Environment, 2001, 36(10): 1119–1126

[12]

Ávila F , Puertas E , Gallego R . Characterization of the mechanical and physical properties of stabilized rammed earth: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 325: 126693

[13]

Gonzalez-Calderon H , Araya-Letelier G , Kunze S , Burbano-Garcia C , Reidel Ú , Sandoval C , Astroza R , Bas F . Biopolymer-waste fiber reinforcement for earthen materials: Capillary, mechanical, impact, and abrasion performance. Polymers, 2020, 12(8): 1819

[14]

Kosarimovahhed M , Toufigh V . Sustainable usage of waste materials as stabilizer in rammed earth structures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277: 123279

[15]

Ghasemalizadeh S , Toufigh V . Durability of rammed earth materials. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(11): 04020201

[16]

Ijaz N , Ye W M , ur Rehman Z , Ijaz Z . Novel application of low carbon limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) in expansive soil stabilization: An eco-efficient approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 371: 133492

[17]

Provis J L , Bernal S A . Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annual Review of Materials Research, 2014, 44(1): 299–327

[18]

Ziamiavaghi B , Toufigh V . Fracture toughness of alkali-activated concrete subjected to aggressive environment. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 451: 138796

[19]

Weise K , Ukrainczyk N , Koenders E . Pozzolanic metakaolin reactions: Stoichiometric and kinetic modeling. Materials & Design, 2024, 239: 112747

[20]

Weise K , Ukrainczyk N , Koenders E . Pozzolanic reactions of metakaolin with calcium hydroxide: Review on hydrate phase formations and effect of alkali hydroxides, carbonates and sulfates. Materials & Design, 2023, 231: 112062

[21]

Turner L K , Collins F G . Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 43: 125–130

[22]

Miraki H , Shariatmadari N , Ghadir P , Jahandari S , Tao Z , Siddique R . Clayey soil stabilization using alkali-activated volcanic ash and slag. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 14(2): 576–591

[23]

Du Y J , Yu B W , Liu K , Jiang N J , Liu M D . Physical, hydraulic, and mechanical properties of clayey soil stabilized by lightweight alkali-activated slag geopolymer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017, 29(2): 04016217

[24]

Singhi B , Laskar A I , Ahmed M A . Mechanical behavior and sulfate resistance of alkali activated stabilized clayey soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2017, 35(5): 1907–1920

[25]

Toufigh V , Ghasemalizadeh S , Karamian M . Experimental investigation of mixture design and durability performance of alkali-activated rammed earth. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 22(4): 04022029

[26]

Hany E , Fouad N , Abdel-Wahab M , Sadek E . Investigating the mechanical and thermal properties of compressed earth bricks made by eco-friendly stabilization materials as partial or full replacement of cement. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 281: 122535

[27]

ACI 544.2R-89. Measurement of Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 1998

[28]

Jabir H A , Abid S R , Hussein M L A , Ali S H . Repeated drop-weight impact tests on RPC containing hybrid fibers. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2020, 897: 49–55

[29]

Sathiparan N , Anburuvel A , Selvam V V , Vithurshan P A . Potential use of groundnut shell ash in sustainable stabilized earth blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 393: 132058

[30]

Poorveekan K , Ath K M S , Anburuvel A , Sathiparan N . Investigation of the engineering properties of cementless stabilized earth blocks with alkali-activated eggshell and rice husk ash as a binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 277: 122371

[31]

ASTM D2487-17. Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2017

[32]

ASTM D4318-10e1. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2010

[33]

ASTM D698-12e2. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN·m/m3)). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2012

[34]

Walker PKeable RMartin JManiatidis V. Rammed Earth: Design and Construction Guidelines. Watford: IHS BRE, 2005

[35]

Walker P. The Australian Earth Building Handbook. Sydney: SAI Global Limited, 2002

[36]

ASTM D2166/D2166M-16. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2016

[37]

Toufigh V , Kianfar E . The effects of stabilizers on the thermal and the mechanical properties of rammed earth at various humidities and their environmental impacts. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 200: 616–629

[38]

ASTM C496/C496M-11. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2011

[39]

Javid A , Toufigh V . Utilizing ensemble machine learning and gray wolf optimization to predict the compressive strength of silica fume mixtures. Structural Concrete, 2024, 25(5): 4048–4074

[40]

Ke G L, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T F, Chen W, Ma W D, Ye Q W, Liu T Y. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017). Long Beach: Curran Associates Inc., 2017, 3149–3157

[41]

Chen T Q, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. San Francisco: ACM, 2016, 785–794

[42]

Lotfalipour F , Javid A , Toufigh V . Boosting algorithms for predicting the bond properties of timber and fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) under thermal cycling using single-lap shear tests. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 2025, 83(2): 83

[43]

Kharrazi H , Toufigh V . Predictive relationships for the mechanical properties of post-fire-cured concretes. Journal of Building Engineering, 2026, 117: 114700

[44]

Kharrazi H , Toufigh V , Boroushaki M . General and optimal 2D convolutional neural networks to predict the residual compressive strength of concretes exposed to high temperatures. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 131: 107901

[45]

Ajir K , Toufigh V , Ghaemian M . Health monitoring of polymer concrete subjected to various temperatures utilizing sinusoidal ultrasonic signals and an agglomeration of artificial intelligence techniques. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2025, 234: 112828

[46]

Lundberg S MLee S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach: Curran Associates Inc., 2017, 4768–4777

[47]

Zhao G J , Pan X Q , Yan H , Tian J F , Han Y F , Guan H Z . Predicting engineering properties of controlled low-strength material made from waste soil using optimized SVR models. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 20: e03325

[48]

Javid A , Kamali H , Toufigh V . Compressive strength prediction of fiber-reinforced concrete under varied temperature conditions using machine learning. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 504: 144648

[49]

Kolawole O , Assaad R H , Adams M P , Ngoma M C , Anya A , Assaf G . Coupled experimental assessment and machine learning prediction of mechanical integrity of MICP and cement paste as underground plugging materials. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(2): 100020

[50]

Mohsennia E , Javid A , Toufigh V . Advanced machine learning techniques for predicting compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of concrete incorporating industrial by-products. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22: e04801

[51]

Hosseini Rad M H , Toufigh V . The mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete at elevated temperatures: Ensemble machine learning models and experimental validation‏. Materials Today Communications, 2025, 49: 114401

[52]

Yang T X , Dou P . Prediction of formation energy for oxides in ODS steels by machine learning. Materials & Design, 2024, 248: 113503

[53]

Javid A , Javid E , Toufigh V . High-temperature bond strength evaluation of concrete overlays with industrial by-products: Experimental and analytical approaches using machine learning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 153: 110954

[54]

Zhang S L , Wang L Y , Zhu S P , Deng X , Fu S C , Luo C Q , Dong Y Y , Yan D P . Physics-informed neural network for creep-fatigue life prediction of Inconel 617 and interpretation of influencing factors. Materials & Design, 2024, 245: 113267

[55]

Bahar R , Benazzoug M , Kenai S . Performance of compacted cement-stabilised soil. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004, 26(7): 811–820

[56]

Eko R M , Offa E D , Ngatcha T Y , Minsili L S . Potential of salvaged steel fibers for reinforcement of unfired earth blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 35: 340–346

[57]

Tran K Q , Satomi T , Takahashi H . Improvement of mechanical behavior of cemented soil reinforced with waste cornsilk fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 178: 204–210

[58]

Porter H , Blake J , Dhami N K , Mukherjee A . Rammed earth blocks with improved multifunctional performance. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 92: 36–46

[59]

Danso H , Martinson B , Ali M , Mant C . Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: A quantitative review. Building Research & Information, 2015, 43(2): 253–262

[60]

Kianfar E , Toufigh V . Reliability analysis of rammed earth structures. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 127: 884–895

[61]

Farhan N A , Sheikh M N , Hadi M N S . Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 196: 26–42

[62]

Zare P , Narani S S , Abbaspour M , Fahimifar A , Hosseini S M M M , Zare P . Experimental investigation of non-stabilized and cement-stabilized rammed earth reinforcement by Waste Tire Textile Fibers (WTTFs). Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260: 120432

[63]

Zamanian M , Salimi M , Payan M , Noorzad A , Hassanvandian M . Development of high-strength rammed earth walls with alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and waste tire textile fiber (WTTF) as a step towards low-carbon building materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 394: 132180

[64]

Ziaadiny-Dashtkhaki A , Toufigh V . Performance of rammed earth exposed to high temperature and direct fire using destructive and nondestructive analysis. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2024, 36(8): 04024203

[65]

Rahmani T , Kiani B , Shekarchi M , Safari A . Statistical and experimental analysis on the behavior of fiber reinforced concretes subjected to drop weight test. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 37: 360–369

[66]

Mastali M , Dalvand A . The impact resistance and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete reinforced with recycled CFRP pieces. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 92: 360–376

[67]

Abid S R , Hussein M L A , Ali S H , Kazem A F . Suggested modified testing techniques to the ACI 544-R repeated drop-weight impact test. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 244: 118321

[68]

Dalvand A , Ahmadi M . Impact failure mechanism and mechanical characteristics of steel fiber reinforced self-compacting cementitious composites containing silica fume. Engineering Science and Technology, An International Journal, 2021, 24(3): 736–748

[69]

Singh B , Ishwarya G , Gupta M , Bhattacharyya S K . Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 85: 78–90

[70]

Soliman A , Abubakr A E , Diab S H . Effect of activator concentrations on the postfire impact behavior of alkali-activated slag concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2023, 35(7): 04023166

[71]

Mhaya A M , Huseien G F , Faridmehr I , Abidin A R Z , Alyousef R , Ismail M . Evaluating mechanical properties and impact resistance of modified concrete containing ground blast furnace slag and discarded rubber tire crumbs. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 295: 123603

[72]

Sreekumaran S , Mohan K S R . Low-velocity impact resistance of reactive powder concrete modified using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 341: 127891

[73]

Behfarnia K , Shahbaz M . The effect of elevated temperature on the residual tensile strength and physical properties of the alkali-activated slag concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 20: 442–454

[74]

Palizi S , Toufigh V . Fire-induced damage assessment of cementless alkali-activated slag-based concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 393: 132002

[75]

Wardhono A , Law D W , Molyneaux T C K . Long term performance of alkali activated slag concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2015, 13(3): 187–192

[76]

Niş A , Eren N A , Çevik A . Effects of nanosilica and steel fibers on the impact resistance of slag based self-compacting alkali-activated concrete. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(17): 23905–23918

[77]

Xing H F , Yang X M , Xu C , Ye G B . Strength characteristics and mechanisms of salt-rich soil–cement. Engineering Geology, 2009, 103(1–2): 33–38

[78]

Zhang M , Guo H , El-Korchi T , Zhang G P , Tao M J . Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 47: 1468–1478

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (9327KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/