Experimental testing and finite element analysis of the tensile response of toothed flange connections
Pantelis MATIS
,
Tony MARTIN
,
Patrick MCGETRICK
,
Su TAYLOR
,
Debra LAEFER
,
Salam AL-SABAH
,
Linh TRUONG-HONG
,
Arturo SCHULTZ
,
Mohammad SHEMSHADIAN
1. School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT95AG, UK
2. School of Engineering, Alice Perry Engineering Building, University of Galway, Galway H91TK33, Ireland
3. Center for Urban Science and Progress and Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY 11201, USA
4. School of Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin D04V1W8, Ireland
5. GeoNext B.V., Den Dolder 3734EE, The Netherlands
6. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
7. Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
pmatis01@qub.ac.uk
Show less
History+
Received
Accepted
Published Online
2025-10-14
2026-01-18
2026-07-03
PDF
(7347KB)
Abstract
Modern steel erection relies on two main connection methods, welding and bolting, which can be expensive field activities and have remained unchanged for nearly a century. To achieve savings in both weight and cost, increased construction effectiveness and higher steel reuse, a novel type of toothed steel connections with the use of precise, advanced manufacturing methods in waterjet or laser cutting has been established that is based on an interlocking approach to connect steel components that have exactly cut ends. This paper presents testing and finite element analysis (FEA) studies of three unique flange plate geometries of the toothed steel connections failing in tension. Tensile tests were carried out on six samples of the toothed flange connections for each of the three geometries and the digital image correlation (DIC) method was utilized to attain axial displacement. The observed key test results, including load–displacement responses, yield loads, failure loads and modes, were fully presented. Strain contours of the connection geometries with the use of the DIC technique at early stage loading and near ultimate failure were also presented. The experimental program was accompanied with a numerical modeling program, in which finite element models were first created in Abaqus structural analysis software and compared against the test results. Based on the tests and numerical data, the performance and the capacity of the three unique flange connections were assessed. The FEA results agreed very well with the test results, indicating that the numerical simulations can accurately predict yield, ultimate load capacities and failure modes of the toothed connections. The numerical models characterized thoroughly the predicted stress distributions within the connections. For capacity-based design, the second flange connection (CON2) geometry could be adopted in beam tensile zones due to its better overall performance.
Pantelis MATIS, Tony MARTIN, Patrick MCGETRICK, Su TAYLOR, Debra LAEFER, Salam AL-SABAH, Linh TRUONG-HONG, Arturo SCHULTZ, Mohammad SHEMSHADIAN.
Experimental testing and finite element analysis of the tensile response of toothed flange connections.
ENG. Struct. Civ. Eng, 2026, 20 (6) : 1158-1174 DOI:10.1007/s11709-026-1307-7
Ramakrishnan S, Rogozinski M W. Properties of electric arc plasma for metal cutting. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1997, 30(4): 636–644
[2]
Ramakrishnan S, Gershenzon M, Polivka F, Kearney T N, Rogozinski M W. Plasma generation for the plasma cutting process. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 1997, 25(5): 937–946
[3]
Krar S, Gill A. Exploring Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. New York, NY: Industrial Press Inc., 2003
[4]
Çelik Y H. Investigating the effects of cutting parameters on materials cut in CNC plasma. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2013, 28(10): 1053–1060
[5]
Björkman B, Samuelsson C. Chapter 6: Recycling of steel. In: Worrell E, Reuter M A, eds. Handbook of Recycling: State-of-the-Art for Practitioners, Analysts, and Scientists. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 65–83
[6]
Sansom M, Avery N. Briefing: Reuse and recycling rates of UK steel demolition arisings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 2014, 167(3): 89–94
[7]
Tingley D D, Cooper S, Cullen J. Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 148: 642–652
[8]
New Steel Construction. Steelwork increases its structural frames market share. 2025 (available at the website of New Steel Construction)
[9]
Precedence Research. Structural steel market size, share and trends 2025 to 2034. 2025 (available at the website of Precedence Research)
[10]
Building Design. CPD 18 2017: Costing structural steelwork. 2025 (available at the website of Building Design)
[11]
Bansal R K. A Textbook of Strength of Materials. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Laxmi Publications, 1996, 902–912
[12]
Mao C, Ricles J, Lu L W, Fisher J. Effect of local details on ductility of welded moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(9): 1036–1044
[13]
BS EN 1993-1-8. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-8: Design of Joints. London: British Standards Institution Group, 2005
[14]
ANSI/AISC 360-16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2016
[15]
Mid City Steel. The benefits of using recycled steel. 2025 (available at the website of Mid City Steel)
[16]
SAC Joint Venture. Interim Guidelines: Evaluation, Repair, Modification and Design of Steel Moment Frames. SAC Joint Venture Report No. SAC-95-02. 1995
[17]
FEMA-350. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000
[18]
ANSI/AISC 358. Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2016
[19]
Hamburger R O, Krawinkler H, Malley J, Adan S. NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 2, Seismic Design of Steel Special Moment Frames: A Guide for Practicing Engineers. NISTGCR Report No. 09-917-3. 2009
[20]
Cordova P P, Hamburger R O.. Steel connections: Proprietary or public domain?. Modern Steel Construction, 2011, 24–31
[21]
Abar B M, Ghobadi M S. New generation of bolted bracket connections: Safe load-carrying capacity and structural damage assessment. Engineering Structures, 2022, 252: 113662
[22]
Yang C, Yang J F, Su M Z, Liu C Z. Numerical study on seismic behaviours of ConXL biaxial moment connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 121: 185–201
[23]
Jin J, El-Tawil S. Seismic performance of steel frames with reduced beam section connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61(4): 453–471
[24]
Alinejad N, Haghi N, Abdollahzadeh G, Efe S. A proposed approach for pin-fuse connections strengthened with pre-tensioned cables. Structures, 2023, 52: 868–876
[25]
Lindapter. Girder clamps: Versatile connection solutions. 2025 (available at the website of Lindapter)
[26]
Burgan B. Report to DTI: Pilot Application of a New Steelwork Connection. Bracknell: The Steel Construction Institute, 2002
[27]
Heywood M D. Quicon® Design Guide to BS 5950-1. Bracknell: The Steel Construction Institute, 2004
[28]
Wang W, Fang C, Yang X, Chen Y, Ricles J, Sause R. Innovative use of a shape memory alloy ring spring system for self-centering connections. Engineering Structures, 2017, 153: 503–515
[29]
Al-Sabah S, Laefer D. GB Patent Application No. 1718744.4, 2017
[30]
Al-Sabah S, Laefer D. GB Patent Application No. 1718746.9, 2017
[31]
Matis P, Martin T, McGetrick P J, Robinson D. The effect of frictional contact properties on intermeshed steel connections. In: Proceedings of the Civil Engineering Research in Ireland 2018 (CERI2018). Dublin: Civil Engineering Research Association of Ireland, 2018, 199
[32]
Matis P, Martin T, McGetrick P J, Robinson D. Modelling and experimental testing of interlocking steel connection behaviour. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering (IALCCE 2018). Ghent: CRC Press, 2018, 666
[33]
Schultz A, Le J L, Shemshadian M, Labbane R, Laefer D, Al-Sabah S, Truong-Hong L, Huynh M P, McGetrick P, Martin T, et al. AMASS: Advanced manufacturing for the assembly structural steel. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ISEC-10). Chicago, IL: ISEC, 2019, STR-80
[34]
Al-Sabah S, Laefer D, Truong-Hong L, Huynh M P, Le J L, Martin T, Matis P, McGetrick P, Schultz A, Shemshadian M E. et al. Introduction of the intermeshed steel connection—A new universal steel connection. Buildings, 2020, 10(3): 37
[35]
McGetrick P J, Matis P, Martin T, Robinson D, Laefer D, Al-Sabah S, Truong-Hong L, Huynh M P, Schultz A E, Le J L. et al. Experimental testing and analysis of the axial behaviour of intermeshed steel connections.. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 2022, 175(2): 153–173
[36]
Shemshadian M E, Schultz A E, Le J L, Labbane R, Laefer D F, Al-Sabah S, Truong-Hong L, Huynh M P, McGetrick P, Martin T. et al. Amass: Advanced manufacturing for the assembly of structural steel. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2021, 26(1): 04020052
[37]
Al-Sabah S, Laefer D, Hong L T, Huynh M P, Le J L, Martin T, Matis P, McGetrick P, Schultz A, Shemshadian M E. et al. Applications of digital manufacturing to steel frames: The intermeshed steel connection. CE/Papers: Proceedings in Civil Engineering, 2021, 4: 817–824
[38]
ISO 7500-1. Metallic Materials: Verification of Static Uniaxial Testing Machines: Tension/Compression Testing Machines. Verification and Calibration of the Force-Measuring System. London: London: British Standards Institution, 2004
[39]
LaVision. StrainMaster Systems. 2018 (available at the website of Lindapter)
[40]
Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Abaqus Theory Manual Version 6.14, 2014
[41]
AISC 360. Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010
[42]
RCSC. RCSC Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts. Chicago, IL: Research Council of Structural Connections, 2014
[43]
BS EN 1090-2. Execution of Steel Structures and Aluminium Structures, Part 2: Technical Requirements for the Execution of Steel Structures. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2002
[44]
Daneshvar H, Driver R G. Modelling benchmarks for steel shear connections in column removal scenario. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 16: 199–212
[45]
Selamet S, Garlock M. Guidelines for modelling three dimensional structural connection models using finite element methods. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium “Steel Structures: Culture and Sustainability 2010”. Istanbul: ECCS & TUCSA, 2010, 14
[46]
Hutton D V. Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis, 1st ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2004
[47]
Yu H, Burgess I W, Davison J B, Plank R J. Numerical simulation of bolted steel connections in fire using explicit dynamic analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2008, 64(5): 515–525
[48]
Matis P. Experimental testing and numerical modelling of the behaviour of intermeshed steel connections. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast, 2024
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn