A self-adaptive intelligent decision-making method with multi-objective optimization for shield tunnel construction risk control

Abstract

Tunnel engineering faces significant challenges due to the complexity and variability of geological conditions. In such contexts, the timely and appropriate adjustment of shield construction parameters (SCP) to match current geological conditions is crucial for ensuring safe and efficient construction. This paper proposes a self-adaptive intelligent decision-making method for risk control in shield tunnel construction, which integrates a multilayer perceptron (MLP) with a multi-objective optimization (MOO) algorithm. Specifically, an MLP combined with particle swarm optimization (PSO) is employed to predict the optimal SCP. These predicted parameters, along with stratum mechanical properties and tunnel depth, serve as inputs for forecasting two critical performance indicators: maximum surface settlement (MSS) and driving speed (DS). The predictive model, coupled with the MOO algorithm, is then utilized to enable dynamic feedback control of the SCP during construction. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method, a case study of Qingdao Metro Line 6 is presented. The results indicated that based on the proposed PSO-MLP-non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), both MSS and DS are effectively improved. The adaptive decision-making between SCP and geological conditions can be realized.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

shield tunnel construction / intelligent decision-making / MOO / performance parameters

References

[1] Zhou X H , Shen S L , Zhou A N . A novel data-driven approach for proactive risk assessment in shield tunnel construction. Transportation Geotechnics, 2025, 50: 101466

[2] Liu W L , Chen E J , Yao E , Wang Y Y , Chen Y Y . Reliability analysis of face stability for tunnel excavation in a dependent system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 206: 107306

[3] Jin D L , Guo Y D , Li X G , Yang Y , Fang Y R . Numerical study on the muck flow behavior in the screw conveyor during EPB shield tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 134: 105017

[4] Cheng P P , Liu F , Xu Y J , Li Y H . Regulating bulkhead pressure of EPB shield machines through DEM modeling and data mining. Underground Space, 2023, 8: 15–29

[5] Wang J , Feng K , Wang Y C , Lin G J , He C . Soil disturbance induced by EPB shield tunnelling in multilayered ground with soft sand lying on hard rock: A model test and DEM study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 130: 104738

[6] Lu D C , Ma Y D , Kong F C , Guo C X , Miao J B , Du X L . Support vector regression with heuristic optimization algorithms for predicting the ground surface displacement induced by EPB shield tunneling. Gondwana Research, 2023, 123: 3–15

[7] Zhang W G , Zhang R H , Wu C Z , Goh A T C , Lacasse S , Liu Z Q , Liu H L . State-of-the-art review of soft computing applications in underground excavations. Geoscience Frontiers, 2020, 11(4): 1095–1106

[8] Deng P H , Liu Q S , Huang X , Liu Q , Ma H , Li W W . Acquisition of normal contact stiffness and its influence on rock crack propagation for the combined finite discrete element method (FDEM). Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 242: 107459

[9] Hu X Y , Fu W , Woody Ju J , He C , Fang Y , Wang J . Face stability conditions in granular soils during the advancing and stopping of earth pressure balanced shield machine. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 109: 103755

[10] Zhang W , Xiang J , Huang R , Liu H . A review of bio-inspired geotechnics-perspectives from geomaterials, geo-components, and drilling & excavation strategies. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(3): 100025

[11] Ma JLuo X. The time and cost modeling of TBM in tunneling based on risk evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application Workshops. Nanchang: IEEE, 2009: 202–205

[12] Liu Q , Huang X , Gong Q , Du L , Pan Y , Liu J . Application and development of hard rock TBM and its prospect in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 33–46

[13] Shang Y JYang Z FZeng Q LSun Y CShi Y GYuan G X. Retrospective analysis of TBM accidents from its poor flexibility to complicated geological conditions. Chinese Journal of Rock mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(12): 2404–2411 (in Chinese)

[14] Ma C S , Chen W Z , Tan X J , Tian H M , Yang J P , Yu J X . Novel rockburst criterion based on the TBM tunnel construction of the Neelum-Jhelum (NJ) hydroelectric project in Pakistan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 391–402

[15] Lin S S , Zhou A N , Shen S L . Optimal construction method evaluation for underground infrastructure construction. Automation in Construction, 2023, 152: 104921

[16] Bilgin N , Yüksel A . The effect of EPB face pressure on TBM performance parameters in different geological formations of Istanbul. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 138: 105184

[17] Ates U , Copur H . Investigation of parameters affecting vibration patterns generated during excavation by EPB TBMs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 138: 105185

[18] Tian T , Lu D C , Kong F C , Ma Y D , Li J L , Du X L . An intelligent method for leakage segmentation and area quantification to evaluate the safety performance of tunnels. Engineering Structures, 2025, 338: 120581

[19] Phoon K K , Zhang W G . Future of machine learning in geotechnics. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2023, 17(1): 7–22

[20] Li J B , Jing L J , Zheng X F , Li P Y , Yang C . Application and outlook of information and intelligence technology for safe and efficient TBM construction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 93: 103097

[21] Lu D C , Liu Y H , Kong F H , He X , Zhou A N , Du X L . A novel Bi-LSTM method fusing current and historical data for tunnelling parameters of shield tunnel. Transportation Geotechnics, 2024, 49: 101402

[22] Phoon K K , Ching J Y , Shuku T . Challenges in data-driven site characterization. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2022, 16(1): 114–126

[23] Zhang J , Zhang C , Qian H , Feng T G , Jian Y Z , Wu R H . Prediction of longitudinal surface settlement in composite formation using large-diameter shield machine based on machine learning techniques. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(12): 1922–1936

[24] Chen R P , Zhang P , Wu H N , Wang Z T , Zhong Z Q . Prediction of shield tunneling-induced ground settlement using machine learning techniques. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1363–1378

[25] Ma J J , Li T B , Yang G , Dai K K , Ma C C , Tang H , Wang G W , Wang J F , Xiao B , Meng L B . A real-time intelligent classification model using machine learning for tunnel surrounding rock and its application. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2023, 17(1): 148–168

[26] Li J B , Chen Z Y , Li X , Jing L J , Zhang Y P , Xiao H H , Wang S J , Yang W K , Wu L J , Li P Y . et al. Feedback on a shared big dataset for intelligent TBM Part I: Feature extraction and machine learning methods. Underground Space, 2023, 11: 1–25

[27] Kannangara K K M , Su L J , Zhou W H . Analysis of post-ground settlement induced during twin tunnelling in silty sand. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 152: 105949

[28] Li X , Xue Y G , Li Z Q , Kong F M , Li G K , Zhou B H . Numerical investigation and prediction of the excavation face stability for river-crossing shield tunneling: An intelligent prediction model for limit support pressure. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 160: 105493

[29] Zhang Z C , Luo H B , Liu J J . Incorporation of knowledge and data-driven models applied in shield tunneling: A review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2025, 264: 111379

[30] Shan F , He X Z , Jahed Armaghani D , Xu H D , Liu X L , Sheng D C . Real-time forecasting of TBM cutterhead torque and thrust force using aware-context recurrent neural networks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 152: 105906

[31] Liu W L , Li A , Liu C J . Multi-objective optimization control for tunnel boring machine performance improvement under uncertainty. Automation in Construction, 2022, 139: 104310

[32] Hosseini H , Taleai M , Zlatanova S . NSGA-II based optimal Wi-Fi access point placement for indoor positioning: A BIM-based RSS prediction. Automation in Construction, 2023, 152: 104897

[33] Guo K , Zhang L M . Data-driven optimization for mitigating tunnel-induced damages. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 115: 108128

[34] Mahmoudabadi V , Ravichandran N . Reliability-based optimization in climate-adaptive design of embedded footing. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2022, 17(2): 287–309

[35] Fan Z , Li W , Cai X , Li H , Wei C , Zhang Q , Deb K , Goodman E . Push and pull search for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2019, 44: 665–679

[36] Fan Z , Zheng Z H , Xu B , Li W J , Zhang Y G , Hao Z F . Performance optimization of hard rock tunnel boring machine using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2022, 169: 108251

[37] Meng F L , Xu J Y , Xia C Q , Chen W , Zhu M , Fu C Q , Chen X S . Optimization of deep excavation construction using an improved multi-objective particle swarm algorithm. Automation in Construction, 2024, 166: 105613

[38] Tao Y Q , He W , Sun H L , Cai Y Q , Chen J Q . Multi-objective optimization-based prediction of excavation-induced tunnel displacement. Underground Space, 2022, 7(5): 735–747

[39] Zhao P J , Liao W J , Xue H J , Lu X Z . Intelligent design method for beam and slab of shear wall structure based on deep learning. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 57: 104838

[40] Chen H Y , Liu J , Shen G Q P , Feng Z B . Control of existing tunnel deformation caused by shield adjacent undercrossing construction using interpretable machine learning and multiobjective optimization. Automation in Construction, 2025, 170: 105943

[41] Xue Y D , Zhao F , Zhao H X , Li X , Diao Z X . A new method for selecting hard rock TBM tunnelling parameters using optimum energy: A case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 78: 64–75

[42] Chen W Y , Liu C L , He R , Chen G X , Jeng D S , Duan L L . Stability of the foundation trench of the immersed tunnel subjected to combined wave and current loading. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 110: 102627

[43] Liu B , Wang Y X , Zhao G Z , Yang B , Wang R R , Huang D X , Xiang B . Intelligent decision method for main control parameters of tunnel boring machine based on multi-objective optimization of excavation efficiency and cost. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 116: 104054

[44] Wu X G , Wang L , Chen B , Feng Z B , Qin Y W , Liu Q , Liu Y . Multi-objective optimization of shield construction parameters based on random forests and NSGA-II. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 54: 101751

[45] Wang H Y , Wang J C , Zhao Y Q , Xu H T . Tunneling parameters optimization based on multi-objective differential evolution algorithm. Soft Computing, 2021, 25(5): 3637–3656

[46] Lin P H , Wu M Z , Xiao Z H , Tiong R L K , Zhang L M . Physics-informed deep reinforcement learning for enhancement on tunnel boring machine’s advance speed and stability. Automation in Construction, 2024, 158: 105234

[47] Kolawole O , Assaad R H , Adams M P , Ngoma M C , Anya A , Assaf G . Coupled experimental assessment and machine learning prediction of mechanical integrity of MICP and cement paste as underground plugging materials. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(2): 100020

[48] Zhang P , Chen R P , Wu H N . Real-time analysis and regulation of EPB shield steering using random forest. Automation in Construction, 2019, 106: 102860

[49] Liu B K , Vu-Bac N , Zhuang X Y , Fu X L , Rabczuk T . Stochastic integrated machine learning based multiscale approach for the prediction of the thermal conductivity in carbon nanotube reinforced polymeric composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2022, 224: 109425

[50] Minsky M LPapert S A. PERCEPTRONS. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2017

[51] Liu B , Wang R R , Zhao G Z , Guo X U , Wang Y X , Li J B , Wang S G . Prediction of rock mass parameters in the TBM tunnel based on BP neural network integrated simulated annealing algorithm. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95(1): 103103

[52] Kong F C , Lu D C , Ma Y D , Li J L , Tian T . Analysis and intelligent prediction for displacement of stratum and tunnel lining by shield tunnel excavation in complex geological conditions: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(11): 22206–22216

[53] Kong F C , Lu D C , Ma Y D , Tian T , Yu H T , Du X L . Novel hybrid method to predict the ground-displacement field caused by shallow tunnel excavation. Science China Technological Sciences, 2023, 66(1): 101–114

[54] Bo Y , Guo X G , Liu Q S , Pan Y C , Zhang L , Lu Y . Prediction of tunnel deformation using PSO variant integrated with XGBoost and its TBM jamming application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 150: 105842

[55] Kennedy JEberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks. New York: IEEE, 1995, 1942–1978

[56] Zhang X , Xia Y Y , Zhang C , Liu B K , Wang C X , Fang H Y , Wang J . A prediction model for dyke-dam piping based on data augmentation and interpretable ensemble learning. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2025, 182: 110174

[57] Kurnaz T F , Erden C , Kökçam A H , Dağdeviren U , Demir A S . A hyper parameterized artificial neural network approach for prediction of the factor of safety against liquefaction. Engineering Geology, 2023, 319: 107109

[58] Zhou J , Shi X Z , Du K , Qiu X Y , Li X B , Mitri H S . Feasibility of random-forest approach for prediction of ground settlements induced by the construction of a shield-driven tunnel. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(6): 04016129

[59] Srinivas N , Deb K . Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221–248

[60] Deb K , Pratap A , Agarwal S , Meyarivan T . A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197

[61] Lü X Q , Wu Y B , Lian J , Zhang Y Y , Chen C , Wang P S , Meng L Z . Energy management of hybrid electric vehicles: A review of energy optimization of fuel cell hybrid power system based on genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 205: 112474

[62] Moniz D , Pedro J , Horta N , Pires J . Multi-objective framework for cost-effective OTN switch placement using NSGA-II with embedded domain knowledge. Applied Soft Computing, 2019, 83: 105608

[63] Etedali S . Ranking of design scenarios of TMD for seismically excited structures using TOPSIS. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(6): 1372–1386

[64] Zhang W G , Gu X , Hong L , Han L , Wang L . Comprehensive review of machine learning in geotechnical reliability analysis: Algorithms, applications and further challenges. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 136: 110066

[65] Liu B K , Liu P J , Wang Y Z , Li Z K , Lv H Q , Lu W Z , Olofsson T , Rabczuk T . Explainable machine learning for multiscale thermal conductivity modeling in polymer nanocomposites with uncertainty quantification. Composite Structures, 2025, 370: 119292

[66] Liu B K , Lu W Z , Olofsson T , Zhuang X Y , Rabczuk T . Stochastic interpretable machine learning based multiscale modeling in thermal conductivity of polymeric graphene-enhanced composites. Composite Structures, 2024, 327: 117601

[67] Kannangara K K M , Zhou W H , Ding Z , Hong Z H . Investigation of feature contribution to shield tunneling-induced settlement using Shapley additive explanations method. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 14(4): 1052–1063

[68] Kong F C , Tian T , Lu D C , Xu B , Lin W P , Du X L . PSO-based machine learning methods for predicting ground surface displacement induced by shallow underground excavation method. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 27(11): 4948–4961

[69] Zhao D P , Wang L W , Zhang B H , Wen S X , Li D , Wang D Y , Fang H C . Study on launch tunnelling parameters of a shield tunnel buried in pebble soil with existing pipelines base on discrete continuous coupling numerical method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 129: 104629

[70] Yu H G , Qin C J , Tao J F , Liu C L , Liu Q S . A multi-channel decoupled deep neural network for tunnel boring machine torque and thrust prediction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 133: 104949

[71] Guo S F , Wang B K , Zhang P , Wang S N , Guo Z H , Hou X Y . Influence analysis and relation evolution between construction parameters and ground settlements induced by shield tunneling under soil-rock mixed-face conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 134: 105020

[72] Zhang Z G , Chen J , Zhang M X , Yang X . Modified Peck method of evaluating tunnelling-induced ground movements based on measured data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15(9): 862

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press