Seismic performance assessment of a precast segmental column bridge considering soil−structure interaction and depth-varying multi-support ground motion inputs

Abstract

The precast segmental column (PSC) plays a vital role in both the design of new bridges and the rehabilitation of existing ones. Previous studies of PSCs have primarily focused on their individual seismic behavior. However, research on the seismic performance of entire bridges supported by PSCs, particularly those incorporating soil−structure interaction (SSI), remains limited. Moreover, the amplification of earthquake waves as they propagate along the pile foundation to the surface, coupled with the coherency loss between earthquake motions at varying supports, may further impact the seismic responses of such bridges. This study systematically assesses the seismic performance of a PSC bridge (PSCB) supported by pile foundations considering the effects of SSI and depth-varying multi-support ground motions. Moreover, a benchmark bridge with the traditional monolithic column is also analyzed for comparison. The seismic fragility of bridges is calculated based on nonlinear time history analyses and joint probability density functions for both peak and residual responses. Parameter studies are conducted to reveal the influences of SSI, non-uniform excitation, and depth-varying earthquake loads on seismic performance assessments. This paper offers valuable insights for the reliable analysis of seismic response and fragility and the safety design of PSCB systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

precast segmental column bridge / soil−structure interaction / depth-varying multi-support ground motions / seismic performance / monolithic column bridge

References

[1] CulmoM PLordBHuieMBeermanB. Accelerated Bridge Construction: Experience in Design, Fabrication and Erection of Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems: Final Manual. FHWA-HIF-12-013. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration. Office of Bridge Technology, 2011

[2] Billington S L , Barnes R W , Breen J E . A precast segmental substructure system for standard bridges. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Journal, 1999, 44(4): 56–73

[3] Zhang Y , Fan W , Zhai Y , Yuan W . Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic behavior of prefabricated bridge columns with UHPFRC bottom segments. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24(8): 04019076

[4] Zhang K , Jia J , Li N , Zhao J , Bai Y . Analytical model for evaluating lateral force capacity of precast concrete-filled steel tube column. Engineering Structures, 2022, 273: 115106

[5] Chou C C , Chang H J , Hewes J T . Two-plastic-hinge and two dimensional finite element models for post-tensioned precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Engineering Structures, 2013, 46: 205–217

[6] Jia J , Zhang K , Wu S , Guo Y , Du X , Wang X . Seismic performance of self-centering precast segmental bridge columns under different lateral loading directions. Engineering Structures, 2020, 221: 111037

[7] Salehi M , Valigura J , Sideris P , Liel A B . Experimental assessment of second-generation hybrid sliding-rocking bridge columns under reversed lateral loading for free and fixed end rotation conditions. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(10): 04021071

[8] Shim C S , Chung C H , Kim H H . Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with a circular solid section. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(12): 3782–3792

[9] Li C , Bi K , Hao H . Seismic performances of precast segmental column under bidirectional earthquake motions: Shake table test and numerical evaluation. Engineering Structures, 2019, 187: 314–328

[10] Li C , Hao H , Bi K . Numerical study on the seismic performance of precast segmental concrete columns under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 2017, 148: 373–386

[11] Dawood H , Elgawady M , Hewes J . Factors affecting the seismic behavior of segmental precast bridge columns. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(4): 388–398

[12] Mantawy I M , Thonstad T , Sanders D H , Stanton J F , Eberhard M O . Seismic performance of precast, pretensioned, and cast-in-place bridges: Shake table test comparison. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(10): 04016071

[13] Sideris P , Aref A J , Filiatrault A . Large-scale seismic testing of a hybrid sliding-rocking posttensioned segmental bridge system. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140(6): 04014025

[14] Zhao L , Bi K , Hao H , Li X . Numerical studies on the seismic responses of bridge structures with precast segmental columns. Engineering Structures, 2017, 151: 568–583

[15] Li S , Zhao T , Alam M S , Cheng Z , Wang J . Probabilistic seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of a seismic resistance bridge system with post-tensioning precast segmental ultra-high performance concrete bridge columns. Engineering Structures, 2020, 225: 111321

[16] Upadhyay A , Pantelides C . Fragility-informed seismic design of multi-column bridge bents with post-tensioned concrete columns for accelerated bridge construction. Engineering Structures, 2022, 269: 114807

[17] Li Q , Bi K , Dong H , Lin Y , Han Q , Du X . Numerical studies on the seismic responses of precast segmental columns-supported bridge structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2022, 25(12): 2527–2546

[18] Li C , Li H N , Hao H , Bi K , Chen B . Seismic fragility analyses of sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges subjected to multi-support ground motions on offshore sites. Engineering Structures, 2018, 165: 441–456

[19] Ramadan O M , Mehanny S S , Kotb A A M . Assessment of seismic vulnerability of continuous bridges considering soil–structure interaction and wave passage effects. Engineering Structures, 2020, 206: 110161

[20] Zuo H , Bi K , Hao H . Dynamic analyses of operating offshore wind turbines including soil–structure interaction. Engineering Structures, 2018, 157: 42–62

[21] Zhang X , Far H . Effects of dynamic soil–structure interaction on seismic behaviour of high-rise buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20(7): 3443–3467

[22] Cavalieri F , Correia A A , Crowley H , Pinho R . Seismic fragility analysis of URM buildings founded on piles: Influence of dynamic soil–structure interaction models. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18(9): 4127–4156

[23] Elwardany H , Seleemah A , Jankowski R , El-Khoriby S . Influence of soil–structure interaction on seismic pounding between steel frame buildings considering the effect of infill panels. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17(11): 6165–6202

[24] Nakhaei M , Ali Ghannad M . The effect of soil–structure interaction on damage index of buildings. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(6): 1491–1499

[25] Pan H , Li C , Tian L . Seismic fragility analysis of transmission towers considering effects of soil–structure interaction and depth-varying ground motion inputs. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19(11): 4311–4337

[26] Bi K , Hao H . Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29: 92–104

[27] Hao H , Oliveira C , Penzien J . Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on smart-1 array data. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1989, 111(3): 293–310

[28] Kiureghian A D . A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1996, 25(1): 99–111

[29] Li C , Diao Y , Li H N , Pan H , Ma R , Han Q , Xing Y . Seismic performance assessment of a sea-crossing cable-stayed bridge system considering soil spatial variability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 235: 109210

[30] Zhao L , Hao H , Bi K , Li X . Numerical study of the seismic responses of precast segmental column bridge under spatially varying ground motions. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(12): 04018096

[31] Li C , Li H , Hao H , Bi K , Tian L . Simulation of multi-support depth-varying earthquake ground motions within heterogeneous onshore and offshore sites. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018, 17(3): 475–490

[32] Wang S , Hao H . Effects of random variations of soil properties on site amplification of seismic ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(7): 551–564

[33] JTG/TB02-01-2008. Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. Beijing: Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China, 2008

[34] MazzoniSMcKennaFScottM HFenvesG L. The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES) User Command-Language Manual. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2006

[35] Lee W K , Billington S L . Performance-based earthquake engineering assessment of a self-centering, post-tensioned concrete bridge system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(8): 887–902

[36] SakaiJMahinS. Analytical Investigations of New Methods for Reducing Residual Displacements of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns. PEER Report 2004/02. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2004

[37] Cai Z K , Wang Z , Yang T . Experimental testing and modeling of precast segmental bridge columns with hybrid normal- and high-strength steel rebars. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 166: 945–955

[38] APIRP 2A-WSD. Recommended Practice for Planning, Design and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute, 1993

[39] HafezDH. Distributed parameter sensitivity analysis of laterally loaded piles in non-homogeneous soil (soft clay overlying sand under cyclic loading). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Windsor: University of Windsor, 2007

[40] Li C , Hao H , Li H , Bi K , Chen B . Modeling and simulation of spatially correlated ground motions at multiple onshore and offshore sites. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 21(3): 359–383

[41] WolfJ. Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1985

[42] Yang J , Sato T . Interpretation of seismic vertical amplification observed at an array site. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2000, 90(2): 275–285

[43] Ma H B , Zhuo W D , Lavorato D , Nuti C , Fiorentino G , Marano G C , Greco R , Briseghella B . Probabilistic seismic response and uncertainty analysis of continuous bridges under near-fault ground motions. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1510–1519

[44] Tavares D H , Padgett J E , Paultre P . Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada. Engineering Structures, 2012, 40: 107–118

[45] Uma S , Pampanin S , Christopoulos C . Development of probabilistic framework for performance-based seismic assessment of structures considering residual deformations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 14(7): 1092–1111

[46] Kim S H , Shinozuka M . Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 19(1-2): 105–112

[47] Yi J H , Kim S H , Kushiyama S . PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(7): 1312–1322

[48] Shrestha B , Li C , Hao H , Li H . Performance-based seismic assessment of superelastic shape memory alloy-reinforced bridge piers considering residual deformations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 21(7): 1050–1069

[49] Vosooghi A , Saiidi M S . Seismic damage states and response parameters for bridge columns. ACI Special Publications, 2010, 271: 29–46

[50] Dong H , Huang H , Ma R , Du X , Han Q . Quantification of multi-level residual drift ratios of RC bridge piers based on traffic flow capacity and its application in seismic failure assessment of RC bridge piers with EDBs. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 22(11): 5917–5949

[51] Wang X , Ye A , Yang D , Wu X , Zhou L , Song K , Li J , Peng J , Lou L , Wei X . Component restoration models of highway bridges for resilience assessment: A nationwide expert-opinion survey study and application. Earthquake Spectra, 2025, 41(1): 495–523

[52] Dong H , Li Y , Bi K , Han Q , Du X . Seismic performance assessment of RC bridge piers with variable hysteresis performance dampers. Engineering Structures, 2024, 310: 118085

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press