Application of intensive construction technology in the grand Paris express project: A review

Yi ZHANG

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 488-501.

PDF(4362 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. All Journals
PDF(4362 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 488-501. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-025-1142-2
REVIEW ARTICLE

Application of intensive construction technology in the grand Paris express project: A review

Author information +
History +

Abstract

With 200 km of new lines and 68 new stations, the Grand Paris Express (GPE) project is currently the biggest transport project under construction in Europe. Starting in 2010, the GPE project involves an ambitious schedule with major milestones planned between 2022 and 2030. To meet these deadlines as well as the associated cost, quality and safety goals, intensive construction technology is needed in this once-in-a-century megaproject, but this project also provides ideal opportunities to apply this technology. This paper offers a review of the new and innovative construction technologies used during the GPE project’s design and construction stages. Such a large project certainly presents a range of complexities and poses many technical, material, human and environmental challenges. Due to its high-risk nature, the risk management plan that applies throughout the whole GPE project, along with the contractual and insurance conditions, is introduced first. Then, an overview is provided of the design principles and construction methods selected to overcome the engineering challenges and reduce the technical risks, all of which are accompanied by monitoring methods and digital approaches. In addition, several new and innovative construction technologies adopted in this project are illustrated. The paper concludes with the project’s environmental protection.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

megaproject / underground works / construction method / innovative technology / environment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yi ZHANG. Application of intensive construction technology in the grand Paris express project: A review. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2025, 19(3): 488‒501 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-025-1142-2
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Clamartstation . The site in pictures . 2018. Available at the website of SGP
[2]
AFTESGT16R2A1. Recommendation: Effects Caused by Excavation on Neighbouring Structures in the Design and Construction of Underground Works. Paris: AFTES, 2020
[3]
AFTESGT32R2A1. Recommendation: Characterisation of Geological, Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Uncertainties and Risks. Paris: AFTES, 2012
[4]
FME(French Ministry of Ecology). Fascicle 69 of CCTG—Underground Works. Paris: FME, 2012 (in French)
[5]
ITA(International Tunnelling Association). ITA Working Group 3: The ITA Contractual Framework Checklist for Subsurface Construction Contracts (2nd Edition). Switzerland: ITA, 2020
[6]
SIA (Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects) . SIA 118/198—General contractual conditions relating to standard SIA 197 Underground constructions—Execution, 2007 (in French)
[7]
Degn Eskesen S, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, Holst Veicherts T. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No.2. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(3): 217–237
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
StilleH. Geological Uncertainties in Tunnelling—Risk Assessment and Quality Assurance. Sir Muir Wood Lecture, International Tunnelling Association. France: Avignon, 2017
[9]
AFTESGT32R3A2. Recommendation: Technical Risks Integration in the Design of Underground Structures Projects for the Purpose of Tender Documentation Drafting. Paris: AFTES, 2020
[10]
ZhangYHamet P. Technical risk management of Line 16 Lot 1 in the Grand Paris Express Project. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress WTC. Denmark: Copenhagen, 2022
[11]
Zhang Y, Hamet P. Line 16-1 of the Grand Paris Express: Feedback on technical risk management. Tunnels and Underground Space, 2022, 281: 70–92
[12]
Zhang Y. Application of risk management plan to technical risks in metro construction: Case study of the Grand Paris Express project. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 147: 105716
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
ISO310000. Risk Management—Guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2018
[14]
CETU(Center for Tunnel Studies). Application guide of Fascicle 69 of CCTG—Underground works. Paris: CETU, 2013 (in French)
[15]
Blouet C, Dougnac A. Extension of line 4 of the Paris metro. Tunnels and Underground Space, 2018, 265: 103–112
[16]
BonfilsNBergere ACoblardMLanquetteFDoussau de Bazignan BThouveninG. Extension of line 14 to the South of Paris: Injections from the old Coarse Limestone quarries. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association. France: Paris, 2021 (in French)
[17]
ChassagneLBlouet CGilbertCLecomteBThidetB Dore RoquetaV. Technological adaptation implemented during freezing work at the future Aubervilliers City Hall station on RATP line 12. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association. Paris, 2021 (in French)
[18]
FluteauxV. Geotechnical issues for the construction of the automatic metro. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Paris, 2013 (in French)
[19]
Karweta-PayenGDufourdOValdemarin F. Line 15 South – Risk mitigation factored in as of the tunnel design stage. Revue Travaux, 2017, 938: 79–86 (in French)
[20]
Mai F, Zhang Y, Magnan J P. Line 15 Lot T2E—Rear station of Noisy-Champs. Tunnels and Underground Space, 2019, 268: 98–121
[21]
Pons G, Le Bissonnais H, Chapron G, Veyron P L. Design and issues for the T3C section from Line 15 south of the Grand Paris Express. Tunnels and Underground Space, 2019, 267: 122–133
[22]
Zhang Y, Commend S, Martin-Lavigne Q, Lacoste J. The white house station of the grand paris express project. Structural Engineering International, 2020, 30(4): 460–467
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
FilliatG. The practice of soils and foundations. Moniteur Editions. 1981 (in French)
[24]
Thierry P, Prunier-Leparmentier A M, Lembezat C, Vanoudheusden E, Vernoux J F. 3D geological modelling at urban scale and mapping of ground movement susceptibility from gypsum dissolution: The Paris example (France). Engineering Geology, 2009, 105(1–2): 51–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Zhang Y, Commend S, Groslambert M. Analyses and modelling of Paris Sparnacian plastic clays. French Geotechnical Journal, 2022, 171(3): 1–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
ZhangYCui Y J. Feedback on the hydromechanical characterizations of Parisi plastic clays. The 17th International Congress of the French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association. France: Paris, 2023 (in French)
[27]
Leca E, New B. ITA/AITES Report 2006 on settlements induced by tunnelling in soft ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 22: 119–149
[28]
MairR. Tunnelling in urban areas and effects on infrastructure—Advances in research and practice. In: Proceedings of Sir Muir Wood Lecture, International Tunnelling Association. 2011
[29]
Minini J, Zhang Y, Groslambert M, Commend S. Finite element-based probabilistic framework including Bayesian inference for predicting displacements due to tunnel excavation. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 162: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
PhoonK KRetief J V. Reliability of Geotechnical Structures in ISO 2394. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016
[31]
Zhang Y, Commend S. Finite element-based probabilistic analyses of displacements due to tunnel construction. French Geotechnical Journal, 2021, 167(5): 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
ISO2394. General principles on reliability for structures. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2015
[33]
CEN. EN 1990-Basis of Structural Design. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2002
[34]
CEN. EN 1997-1-Geotechnical Design: General Rules. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004
[35]
Zhang Y, Toutlemonde F. Calibrating partial safety factors in line with required reliability levels for concrete structures. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2022, 26(9): 3863–3879
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
SchöbiRSudretBWiartJ.. Polynomial-Chaos-based Kriging, 2015, arXiv:1502.03939
[37]
Chartier-KastlerN. Line 15 Sud-Lot T3B-Clamart—The cover slab enters the station. Revue Travaux, 2017, 938: 103–108 (in French)
[38]
HongK. Key Technologies for Tunnel Construction Under Complex Geological and Environmental Conditions: Shield Tunneling Technology in Hard-soft Uneven Stratum and Extremely-soft Stratum. Berlin: Springer Nature, 2021.
[39]
MaidlBHerrenknecht MMaidlUWehrmeyerG. Mechanised Shield Tunnelling (2nd Edition). New York: Ernst & Sohn, 2012.
[40]
CombeBMarcucci E. Line 15 South T2A between the stations of Villejuif-Louis-Aragon and Créteil-L’Echat, choice of the type of TBM. Revue Travaux, 2017, 938: 89–93 (in French)
[41]
AFTESGT4R6F1. Recommendation: State of the art concerning developments in tunnel boring machines and their capacities from 2000 to 2019. Paris: AFTES, 2019 (in French)
[42]
Huyghues-BeaufondT. Grand Paris Express: advice and technical expertise in the shadows of construction sites. Revue Travaux, 2020, 965: 18–23 (in French)
[43]
KoudogboFUrdiroz ARoblesJ GChapronGLebonG FluteauxVPriol G. Radar interferometry as an innovative solution for monitoring the construction of the Grand Paris Express metro network-First results. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress WTC. United Arab of Emirates: Dubai, 2018
[44]
KoudogboFMeyer GLeonardRHuygues-BeaufondTUrdiroz AHenrionEDupratS. Integration of radar interferometry in monitoring of the operations of the first tunnel boring machine of the Grand Paris Express. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association. France: Paris, 2021
[45]
ZhangYSemeraro MSandréCHametP. L16-1 of the Grand Paris Express—Challenges and achievement. French Civil Engineering Congress 2023. France: Gif-sur-Yvette, 2023 (in French)
[46]
Baucal-PoyacLD’AloiaSchwartzentruber LFerailleA. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) applied to the digging of underground structures. French Civil Engineering Congress 2023. France: Gif-sur-Yvette, 2023 (in French)
[47]
SchmaehPFrey S. Mechanized shaft sinking in traffic tunnel projects. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association. France: Paris, 2021
[48]
L.Lévèque. Grand Paris Express: at Malakoff, the vertical tunnel boring machine takes action. November 2018. Available at the website of Le Moniteur (in French)
[49]
Bischoff J L, Berge B, De Rivaz B. ‘Un Grand Pari’ Innovation on Paris Metro line 16-1. Tunnels and Underground Space, 2021, 278: 92–107
[50]
HamelinBKaram HSenechalMFerrariMRoussotP. Grand Paris Express Line 16: First time use in France of steel fibers (SFRC) for TBM tunnel lining segments. In: Proceedings of the world tunnel congress WTC. Denmark: Copenhagen, 2022
[51]
LesurV. Grand Paris Express Line 18 work section 1—Installing the first EXEGY® Ultra-Low-Carbon segments. Revue Travaux, 2022, 983: 79–83 (in French)
[52]
Events-France. Installation of the first Exegy® ultra-low-carbon segment on the Grand Paris Express worksite. June 2022. Available at the website of Vinci
[53]
AFNOR. NF EN 15643: Sustainability of Construction Works—Framework for Assessment of Buildings and Civil Engineering Works. Paris: French Association for Standardization, 2021
[54]
SadokAMoriceau LVaillantP. Method for systematically evaluating the environmental and energy performances of transport offers in works contracts. Congrès Français du Génie Civil 2023. France: Gif-sur-Yvette, 2023 (in French)
[55]
BoudrieresF. Excavated material for the ‘Grand Paris Express’: A 45 million tonne challenge. Revue Travaux, 2017, 938: 20–27 (in French)
[56]
BoulangéLDoomFTrottinJ L HametP. CARASOL or Rapid Characterization of SOILs from earth pressure tunnel boring machines during the construction of line 16-1. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association. France: Paris, 2021 (in French)
[57]
CFMS(French Soil Mechanics Committee). Recommendations for the design, sizing and implementation of thermal geostructures. France: CFMS (French Soil Mechanics Committee), 2017 (in French)
[58]
Delerablée Y, Rammal D, Mroueh H, Burlon S, Habert J, Froitier C. Integration of thermoactive metro stations in a smart energy system: Feedbacks from the grand paris project. Infrastructures, 2018, 3(4): 56
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Mr. Matthew Langsley for proofreading this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4362 KB)

139

Accesses

0

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/