Evaluating machine learning model for investigating surface chloride concentration of concrete exposed to tidal environment

Abstract

The surface chloride concentration of concrete is a critical factor in determining the service life of concrete in tidal environments. This study aims to identify an effective Machine Learning (ML) model for predicting and assessing surface chloride concentration in such conditions. Using a database that includes 12 input variables and 386 samples of surface chloride concentration in seawater-exposed concrete, the study evaluates the predictive performance of nine ML models. Among these models, the Gradient Boosting (GB) model, using default hyperparameters, demonstrates the best performance, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.920 and a root mean square error of 0.103% by weight of concrete for the testing data set. Furthermore, an Excel file based on the GB model is created to estimate surface chloride concentration, simplifying the mix design process according to concrete durability requirements. The Shapley additive explanation values and partial dependence plot one dimension offer a detailed analysis of the impact of the 12 variables on surface chloride concentration. The four most influential factors are, in descending order, fine aggregate content, exposure time, annual mean temperature, and coarse aggregate content. Specifically, surface chloride concentration increases linearly with prolonged exposure time, stabilizing after a certain period, while higher fine aggregate content leads to a reduction in surface chloride concentration.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

machine learning / surface chloride concentration / seawater / factor effect / service life / tidal environment

References

[1] de Weerdt K, Orsáková D, Müller A C A, Larsen C K, Pedersen B, Geiker M R. Towards the understanding of chloride profiles in marine exposed concrete, impact of leaching and moisture content. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 120: 418–431

[2] GjørvO E. Durability Design of Concrete Structures in Severe Environments. London: CRC Press, 2014

[3] TuuttiK. Corrosion of steel in concrete. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 1982

[4] NguyenL K. Research on high corrosion resistance concrete using silica-fume for building structures exposed to marine environment of Vietnam. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hanoi: University of Transport and Communications, 2023

[5] Nguyen L K, Nguyen T T T, Nguyen S T, Ngo T Q, Le T H, Dang V Q, Ho L S. Mechanical properties and service life analysis of high strength concrete using different silica fume contents in marine environment in Vietnam. Journal of Engineering Research, 2024, 12(2): 44–53

[6] Nguyen L K, Nguyen T T T. Forecasting the lifespan of steel–concrete structures in the marine environment by Life-365 software. Transportation Journal, 2021, 3: 92–95

[7] Angst U, Elsener B, Larsen C K, Vennesland Ø. Critical chloride content in reinforced concrete––A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 2009, 39(12): 1122–1138

[8] Tran V Q. Using a geochemical model for predicting chloride ingress into saturated concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2022, 74(6): 303–314

[9] Ranjith A, Balaji Rao K, Manjunath K. Evaluating the effect of corrosion on service life prediction of RC structures––A parametric study. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2016, 5(2): 587–603

[10] Song H W, Shim H B, Petcherdchoo A, Park S K. Service life prediction of repaired concrete structures under chloride environment using finite difference method. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009, 31(2): 120–127

[11] Chalee W, Jaturapitakkul C, Chindaprasirt P. Predicting the chloride penetration of fly ash concrete in seawater. Marine Structures, 2009, 22(3): 341–353

[12] Shakouri M, Trejo D. A study of the factors affecting the surface chloride maximum phenomenon in submerged concrete samples. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 94: 181–190

[13] Gao Y, Zhang J, Zhang S, Zhang Y. Probability distribution of convection zone depth of chloride in concrete in a marine tidal environment. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 140: 485–495

[14] Cai R, Han T, Liao W, Huang J, Li D, Kumar A, Ma H. Prediction of surface chloride concentration of marine concrete using ensemble machine learning. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 136: 106164

[15] Li Q, Li K, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Fan Z. Model-based durability design of concrete structures in Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau sea link project. Structural Safety, 2015, 53: 1–12

[16] Marques P F, Costa A, Lanata F. Service life of RC structures: Chloride induced corrosion: Prescriptive versus performance-based methodologies. Materials and Structures, 2012, 45(1–2): 277–296

[17] Nguyen H L, Tran V Q. Data-driven approach for investigating and predicting rutting depth of asphalt concrete containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Construction & Building Materials, 2023, 377: 131116

[18] Gupta T, Rao M C. Prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques. Structural Concrete, 2022, 23(5): 3073–3090

[19] Tran V Q, Dang V Q, Ho L S. Evaluating compressive strength of concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates using machine learning approach. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 323: 126578

[20] Mende H, Frye M, Vogel P A, Kiroriwal S, Schmitt R H, Bergs T. On the importance of domain expertise in feature engineering for predictive product quality in production. Procedia CIRP, 2023, 118: 1096–1101

[21] Almeida J S. Predictive non-linear modeling of complex data by artificial neural networks. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2002, 13(1): 72–76

[22] Janiesch C, Zschech P, Heinrich K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets, 2021, 31(3): 685–695

[23] AwadMKhannaR. Machine learning. In: Awad M, Khanna R, eds. Efficient Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts, and Applications for Engineers and System Designers. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2015, 1–18

[24] Lundberg S M, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin J M, Nair B, Katz R, Himmelfarb J, Bansal N, Lee S I. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2020, 2(1): 56–67

[25] Karniadakis G E, Kevrekidis I G, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L. Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews. Physics, 2021, 3(6): 422–440

[26] Salvati E, Tognan A, Laurenti L, Pelegatti M, de Bona F. A defect-based physics-informed machine learning framework for fatigue finite life prediction in additive manufacturing. Materials & Design, 2022, 222: 111089

[27] Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh V M, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790

[28] Zhuang X, Guo H, Alajlan N, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2021, 87: 104225

[29] Guo H, Yin Z Y. A novel physics-informed deep learning strategy with local time-updating discrete scheme for multi-dimensional forward and inverse consolidation problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 421: 116819

[30] LundbergS MLeeS I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017). New York, NY: Curran Associates, Inc., 2017

[31] Friedman J H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 2001, 29(5): 1189–1232

[32] NguyenQ HLyH BHoL SAl-AnsariNLeH VTranV QPrakashIPhamB T. Influence of data splitting on performance of machine learning models in prediction of shear strength of soil. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021, 2021: e4832864

[33] Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273–297

[34] Zhang Y, Zhang H, Cai J, Yang B. A weighted voting classifier based on differential evolution. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, 2014: e376950

[35] Freund Y, Schapire R E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1997, 55(1): 119–139

[36] Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32

[37] AyyadevaraV K. Gradient boosting machine. In: Ayyadevara V K. Pro Machine Learning Algorithms. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2018, 117–134

[38] Friedman J H. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2002, 38(4): 367–378

[39] LightGBM. LightGBM’s Documentation Version 3.2.1.99, 2021

[40] Quinlan J R. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1986, 1(1): 81–106

[41] Piryonesi S M, El-Diraby T E. Role of data analytics in infrastructure asset management: Overcoming data size and quality problems. Journal of Transportation Engineering: Part B, Pavements, 2020, 146(2): 04020022

[42] HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJ. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2009

[43] Friedman J H. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The Annals of Statistics, 1991, 19(1): 1–67

[44] Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V. . Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011, 12: 2825–2830

[45] BrownleeJ. XGBoost with Python: Gradient Boosted Trees with XGBoost and Scikit-Learn. San Francisco, CA: Machine Learning Mastery, 2016

[46] MolnarC. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). In: Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable. Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press, 2022

[47] Lin S, Zheng H, Han B, Li Y, Han C, Li W. Comparative performance of eight ensemble learning approaches for the development of models of slope stability prediction. Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17(4): 1477–1502

[48] Lin S, Liang Z, Zhao S, Dong M, Guo H, Zheng H. A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble machine learning in geotechnical stability analysis and explainability. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 2024, 20(2): 331–352

[49] Lin S, Liang Z, Dong M, Guo H, Zheng H. Imbalanced rock burst assessment using variational autoencoder-enhanced gradient boosting algorithms and explainability. Underground Space, 2024, 17: 226–245

[50] Shakouri M, Trejo D. A time-variant model of surface chloride build-up for improved service life predictions. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 84: 99–110

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press