FEM and ANN analyses of short and tall geosynthetic reinforced soil walls: Evaluation of various effective aspects and ASSHTO acceptable design methods

Hamid Reza RAZEGHI, Ali Akbar Heshmati RAFSANJANI, Seyed Meisam ALAVI

PDF(5105 KB)
PDF(5105 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (10) : 1576-1594. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-024-1096-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE

FEM and ANN analyses of short and tall geosynthetic reinforced soil walls: Evaluation of various effective aspects and ASSHTO acceptable design methods

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In addition to confined investigations on tall geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) walls, a remarkable database of such walls must be analyzed to diminish engineers’ concerns regarding the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Simplified or Simplified Stiffness Method in projects. There are also uncertainties regarding reinforcement load distributions of GRS walls at the connections. Hence, the current study has implemented a combination of finite element method (FEM) and artificial neural network (ANN) to distinguish the performance of short and tall GRS walls and assess the AASHTO design methods based on 88 FEM and 10000 ANN models. There were conspicuous differences between the effectiveness of stiffness (63%), vertical spacing (22%), and length of reinforcements (14%) in the behavior of short and tall walls, along with predictions of geogrid load distributions. These differences illustrated that using the Simplified Method may exert profound repercussions because it does not consider wall height. Furthermore, the Simplified Stiffness Method (which incorporates wall height) predicted the reinforcement load distributions at backfill and connections well. Moreover, a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithm with a low average overall relative error (up to 2.8%) was developed to propose upper and lower limits of reinforcement load distributions, either at backfill or connections, based on 990000 ANN predictions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

geosynthetics / short and tall GRS walls / artificial intelligence / MLP / AASHTO Simplified and Simplified Stiffness Methods

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hamid Reza RAZEGHI, Ali Akbar Heshmati RAFSANJANI, Seyed Meisam ALAVI. FEM and ANN analyses of short and tall geosynthetic reinforced soil walls: Evaluation of various effective aspects and ASSHTO acceptable design methods. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(10): 1576‒1594 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1096-9

References

[1]
AASHTO. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 9th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2020
[2]
Koerner R M, Koerner G R. An extended data base and recommendations regarding 320 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2018, 46(6): 904–912
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
BergR RChristopherB RSamtaniN C. Design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes—Volume II. FHWA Technical Report FHWA-NHI-10-024. 2009
[4]
Sabermahani M, Ghalandarzadeh A, Fakher A. Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(2): 121–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
WuJ T. Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2019
[6]
SankeyJ ESolimanA. Tall wall mechanically stabilized earth applications. In: Proceedings of Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012, 2149–2158
[7]
BrinkgreveR B JZampichL MRagi ManojNWatermanDChesaruABonnierP G. Plaxis Connect Edition V20. Delft: Bentley Systems, incorporated. 2019
[8]
BathurstR JWaltersDVlachopoulosNBurgessPAllenT M. Full Scale testing of geosynthetic reinforced walls. In: Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems Using Geosynthetics. Denver: ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, 2000, 201–217
[9]
Hatami K, Bathurst R J. Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(6): 673–684
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Askari M, Razeghi H R, Mamaghanian J. Numerical study of geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutment performance under static and seismic loading considering effects of bridge deck. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2021, 49(5): 1339–1354
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
BenzT. Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, 2007
[12]
SchanzTVermeerPBonnierP G. The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification. In: Proceeding of Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2019, 281–296
[13]
BrinkgreveREnginEEnginH K. Validation of empirical formulas to derive model parameters for sands. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. Trondheim: CRC Press, 2010, 137–142
[14]
Obrzud R F. On the use of the hardening soil small strain model in geotechnical practice. Numerics in Geotechnics and Structures, 2010, 16: 1–17
[15]
Ezzeldin I, El Naggar H. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of corrugated metal pipes. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 27: 100467
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
LadeP VLeeK L. Engineering Properties of Soils. Technical Report UCLA-ENG-7652. 1976
[17]
Marachi N D, Duncan J M, Chan C K, Seed H B. Plane-strain testing of sand, in laboratory shear strength of soil. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1981, 740: 294–302
[18]
Mohamed S B, Yang K H, Hung W Y. Finite element analyses of two-tier geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls: Comparison involving centrifuge tests and limit equilibrium results. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 61: 67–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
JewellR. Some effects of reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of soils. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 1980
[20]
DyerMMilliganG E. A photoelastic investigation of the interaction of a cohesionless soil with reinforcement placed at different orientations. In: Proceedings of the Conference’s in situ Soil and Rock Reinforcement. Paris: National Road and Bridge College, 1984
[21]
Hatami K, Bathurst R J. Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 1066–1085
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Huang B, Bathurst R J, Hatami K. Numerical study of reinforced soil segmental walls using three different constitutive soil models. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(10): 1486–1498
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
BS8006: 1995. Strengthened/Reinforced Soils and Other fills. London: British Standards Institution, 1995
[24]
NCMA. Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls. 2nd ed. Herndon: National Concrete Masonry Association, 2002
[25]
LiuCEvettJ B. Soils and Foundations. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2007
[26]
Ling H I, Leshchinsky D. Finite element parametric study of the behavior of segmental block reinforced-soil retaining walls. Geosynthetics International, 2003, 10(3): 77–94
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hatami K, Bathurst R J, Di Pietro P. Static response of reinforced soil retaining walls with nonuniform reinforcement. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2001, 1(4): 477–506
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Bilgin Ö, Mansour E. Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls. Engineering Structures, 2014, 59: 663–673
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
PiersonM. Behavior of laterally loaded shafts constructed behind the face of a mechanically stabilized earth block wall. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 2008
[30]
PiersonM CParsonsR LHanJBrownDThompsonW R. Capacity of laterally loaded shafts constructed behind the face of a mechanically stabilized earth block wall. 2009. Available at the website of National Academies
[31]
Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh V M, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Wang S, Wang H, Zhou Y, Liu J, Dai P, Du X, Abdel Wahab M. Automatic laser profile recognition and fast tracking for structured light measurement using deep learning and template matching. Measurement, 2021, 169: 108362
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Dang B L, Nguyen-Xuan H, Abdel Wahab M. An effective approach for VARANS-VOF modelling interactions of wave and perforated breakwater using gradient boosting decision tree algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 268: 113398
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Nghia-Nguyen T, Kikumoto M, Nguyen-Xuan H, Khatir S, Abdel Wahab M, Cuong-Le T. Optimization of artificial neutral networks architecture for predicting compression parameters using piezocone penetration test. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 223: 119832
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Nguyen D H, Abdel Wahab M. Damage detection in slab structures based on two-dimensional curvature mode shape method and Faster R-CNN. Advances in Engineering Software, 2023, 176: 103371
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Tran V T, Nguyen T K, Nguyen-Xuan H, Abdel Wahab M. Vibration and buckling optimization of functionally graded porous microplates using BCMO-ANN algorithm. Thin-walled Structures, 2023, 182: 110267
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Gordan B, Koopialipoor M, Clementking A, Tootoonchi H, Tonnizam Mohamad E. Estimating and optimizing safety factors of retaining wall through neural network and bee colony techniques. Engineering with Computers, 2019, 35(3): 945–954
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Pramanik R, Babu G S. Prediction of the maximum tensile load in reinforcement layers of a MSE wall using ANN-based response surface method and probabilistic assessment of internal stability of the wall. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 22(8): 05022004
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Dal K, Cansiz O F, Ornek M, Turedi Y. Prediction of footing settlements with geogrid reinforcement and eccentricity. Geosynthetics International, 2019, 26(3): 297–308
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
AllenTChristopherBEliasVDiMaggioJ. Development of the Simplified Method for Internal Stability Design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls. Technical Report WA-RD 513.1. 2001
[42]
Bathurst R J, Naftchali F M. Geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness for analytical and numerical modelling of reinforced soil structures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2021, 49(4): 921–940
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Allen T, Bathurst R J, Holtz R D, Walters D, Lee W F. A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(5): 976–994
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Bathurst R, Miyata Y, Nernheim A, Allen A M. Refinement of K-stiffness method for geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15(4): 269–295
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Allen T M, Bathurst R J. Improved simplified method for prediction of loads in reinforced soil walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015049
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk: IBM Corporation. 2019
[47]
Ling H I, Cardany C P, Sun L X, Hashimoto H. Finite element study of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-block facing. Geosynthetics International, 2000, 7(3): 163–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Hatami K, Witthoeft A F. A numerical study on the use of geofoam to increase the external stability of reinforced soil walls. Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15(6): 452–470
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Yu Y, Bathurst R J, Allen T M. Numerical modeling of the SR-18 geogrid reinforced modular block retaining walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(5): 04016003
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Yu Y, Bathurst R J. Influence of selection of soil and interface properties on numerical results of two soil-geosynthetic interaction problems. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(6): 04016136
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Vahedifard F, Tehrani F S, Galavi V, Ragno E, AghaKouchak A. Resilience of MSE walls with marginal backfill under a changing climate: Quantitative assessment for extreme precipitation events. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 143(9): 04017056
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Yoo C, Jang Y S, Park I J. Internal stability of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls in tiered configuration. Geosynthetics International, 2011, 18(2): 74–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Yoo C. Serviceability state deformation behaviour of two-tiered geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. Geosynthetics International, 2018, 25(1): 12–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Sadat M R, Huang J, Bin-Shafique S, Rezaeimalek S. Study of the behavior of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls subjected to differential settlements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2018, 46(1): 77–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Nascimento G, Ehrlich M, Mirmoradi S H. Numerical- simulation of compaction-induced stress for the analysis of RS walls under surcharge loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2020, 48(4): 532–538
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Rajagopal G, Thiyyakkandi S. Numerical evaluation of the performance of back-to-back MSE walls with hybrid select-marginal fill zones. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 26: 100445
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Liu H, Won M. Long-term reinforcement load of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(7): 875–889
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Xie Y, Leshchinsky B. MSE walls as bridge abutments: Optimal reinforcement density. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015, 43(2): 128–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Lin B H, Yu Y, Bathurst R J, Liu C N. Deterministic and probabilistic prediction of facing deformations of geosynthetic-reinforced MSE walls using a response surface approach. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(6): 813–823
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Gu M, Collin J G, Han J, Zhang Z, Tanyu B F, Leshchinsky D, Ling H I, Rimoldi P. Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2017, 45(4): 294–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Yazdandoust M, Taimouri A B B. Lateral pressure distribution and shear band development in two-tiered MSE walls under footing loading. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 23(5): 04023038
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Runser D, Fox P, Bourdeau P. Field performance of a 17 m-high reinforced soil retaining wall. Geosynthetics International, 2001, 8(5): 367–391
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Stuedlein A W, Bailey M, Lindquist D, Sankey J, Neely W J. Design and performance of a 46 m-high MSE wall. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(6): 786–796
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Stuedlein A W, Allen T M, Holtz R D, Christopher B R. (345–356). Assessment of reinforcement strains in very tall mechanically stabilized earth walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(3): 345–356
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Damians I P, Bathurst R J, Josa A, Lloret A. Numerical analysis of an instrumented steel-reinforced soil wall. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 15(1): 04014037
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Lelli M, Laneri R, Rimoldi P. Innovative reinforced soil structures for high walls and slopes combining polymeric and metallic reinforcements. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 125: 397–405
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(5105 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/