Proposed numerical and machine learning models for fiber-reinforced polymer concrete-steel hollow and solid elliptical columns

Abstract

This study employs a hybrid approach, integrating finite element method (FEM) simulations with machine learning (ML) techniques to investigate the structural performance of double-skin tubular columns (DSTCs) reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP). The investigation involves a comprehensive examination of critical parameters, including aspect ratio, concrete strength, number of GFRP confinement layers, and dimensions of steel tubes used in DSTCs, through comparative analyses and parametric studies. To ensure the credibility of the findings, the results are rigorously validated against experimental data, establishing the precision and trustworthiness of the analysis. The present research work examines the use of the columns with elliptical cross-sections and contributes valuable insights into the application of FEM and ML in the design and evaluation of structural systems within the field of structural engineering.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

elliptical column / fiber-reinforced polymer / machine learning / finite element method / ABAQUS

References

[1] Li X, Wang L G, Zhang Y S, Gao H Y. Flexural behavior of hybrid GFRP-reinforced concrete-steel double-skin tubular beams. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2022, 29(28): 7351–7363

[2] MotavalliMCzaderskiC. FRP composites for retrofitting of existing civil structures in Europe: State-of-the-art review. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Composites and Polycon. Arlington, VA: American Composites Manufacturers Association, 2007

[3] Zhang J B, Xu Z D, Han J S, Wang X D. Prediction of the thermal contact resistance at the steel-concrete interface of CFST columns with circular cross-section. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2012, 19(7): 530–542

[4] Xu J J, Chen Z P, Xiao Y, Demartino C, Wang J H. Recycled aggregate concrete in FRP-confined columns: A review of experimental results. Composite Structures, 2017, 174: 277–291

[5] Raza A, Alomayri T, Berradia M. Rapid repair of partially damaged GFRP-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete columns using FRP composites. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2022, 29(27): 6070–6086

[6] Isleem H F, Wang D Y, Wang Z Y. Axial stress-strain model for square concrete columns internally confined with GFRP hoops. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2018, 70(20): 1064–1079

[7] Baili J, Raza A, Azab M, Ali K, El Ouni M H, Haider H, Farooq M A. Experiments and predictive modeling of optimized fiber-reinforced concrete columns having FRP rebars and hoops. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2023, 30(23): 4913–4932

[8] Zhang Y F, Zhang Z Q. Study on equivalent confinement coefficient of composite CFST column based on unified theory. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2016, 23(1): 22–27

[9] Wang Y L, Cai G H, Li Y Y, Waldmann D, Si Larbi A, Tsavdaridis K D. Behavior of circular fiber-reinforced polymer-steel-confined concrete columns subjected to reversed cyclic loads: Experimental studies and finite-element analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(9): 04019085

[10] Isleem H F, Augustino D S, Mohammed A S, Najemalden A M, Jagadesh P, Qaidi S, Sabri M M S. Finite element, analytical, and artificial neural network (ANN) models for CFRP-confined concrete-filled steel columns with elliptical cross section. Frontiers in Materials, 2023, 9: 818

[11] El Ouni M H, Raza A. Data-driven analysis of concrete-filled steel-tube CFRP-confined NSC columns. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2022, 29(27): 5667–5688

[12] Jiang T, Teng J G. Analysis-oriented stress-strain models for FRP-confined concrete. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(11): 2968–2986

[13] Teng J G, Jiang T, Lam L, Luo Y Z. Refinement of a design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2009, 13(4): 269–278

[14] Lam L, Teng J G. Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction ands Building Materials, 2003, 17(6–7): 471–489

[15] Lam L, Teng J G. Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete in rectangular columns. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2003, 22(13): 1149–1186

[16] Diboune N, Benzaid R, Berradia M. New strength–strain model and stress–strain relationship for square and rectangular concrete columns confined with CFRP wraps. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2023, 30(14): 2971–2994

[17] Teng J G, Lam L. Behavior and modeling of fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(11): 1713–1723

[18] Isleem H F, Wang D Y, Wang Z Y. Modeling the axial compressive stress–strain behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular RC columns under monotonic and cyclic loading. Composite Structures, 2018, 185(1): 229–240

[19] Isleem H F, Wang D Y, Wang Z Y, Smith S T. Monotonic and cyclic axial compressive behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular RC columns. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2018, 22(4): 04018023

[20] TengJ GYuTWongY L. Behaviour of hybrid FRP concrete- steel double-skin tubular columns. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004, 811–818

[21] LuZGuoCChenZ. Multi-scale mechanism of steel tube restraint effect on concrete of CFST. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2023: 1–16

[22] ZhangBYuTTengJ G. Axial compression tests on hybrid double-skin tubular columns filled with high strength concrete. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Postgraduate Conference on Infrastructure and Environment. Hong Kong, China: IPCIE, 2011, 171–176

[23] Zhang B, Teng J G, Yu T. Compressive behavior of double-skin tubular columns with high-strength concrete and a filament-wound FRP tube. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2017, 21(5): 04017029

[24] Zeng J J, Lin G, Teng J G, Li L J. Behavior of large-scale FRP-confined rectangular RC columns under axial compression. Engineering Structures, 2018, 174: 629–645

[25] Jiang J, Li P, Nisticò N. Local and global prediction on stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined square concrete sections. Composite Structures, 2019, 226: 111205

[26] Wang Y, Liu P, Cao Q, Chen G, Wan B, Wei Z, Bai Y L. Comparison of monotonic axial compressive behavior of rectangular concrete confined by FRP with different rupture strains. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 299: 124241

[27] Zhang B, Feng G, Wang Y, Lai C, Wang C, Hu X. Elliptical FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns under monotonic axial compression. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2020, 2020: 1–6

[28] Chen G P, Wang Y L, Yu T, Wan B L, Zhang B, Liu Q. Behavior and design-oriented model for elliptical FRP-confined concrete under axial compression. Engineering Structures, 2021, 249: 113387

[29] Teng J G, Wu J Y, Casalboni S, Xiao Q G, Zhao Y. Behaviour and modeling of fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete in elliptical columns. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2016, 19(9): 1359–1378

[30] Liu K C, Jiang C, Yu T, Teng J G. Compressive behaviour of elliptical FRP tube-confined concrete columns. Composite Structures, 2023, 303: 116301

[31] Bhowmik B, Tripura T, Hazra B, Pakrashi V. Real time structural modal identification using recursive canonical correlation analysis and application towards online structural damage detection. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 468: 115101

[32] BhowmikBHazraBPakrashiV. Real-time Structural Health Monitoring of Vibrating Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2022

[33] Mai H T, Kang J, Lee J. A machine learning-based surrogate model for optimization of truss structures with geometrically nonlinear behaviour. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2021, 196: 103572

[34] Couto Carneiro M, Carvalho Alves A F, Cardoso Coelho R P, Cardoso J S, Andrade Pires F M. A simple machine learning-based framework for faster multi-scale simulations of path-independent materials at large strains. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2023, 222: 103956

[35] Muñoz D, Nadal E, Albelda J, Chinesta F, Ródenas J J. Allying topology and shape optimization through machine learning algorithms. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2022, 204: 103719

[36] Thai H T. Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Structures, 2022, 38: 448–491

[37] Le-Duc T, Nguyen-Xuan H, Lee J. A finite-element-informed neural network for parametric simulation in structural mechanics. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2023, 217: 103904

[38] He L, Li Y, Torrent D, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Jin Y. Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: A review. Microstructures, 2023, 3: 2023037

[39] Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh V M, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790

[40] Isleem H F, Tayeh B A, Alaloul W S, Musarat M A, Raza A. Artificial neural network (ANN) and finite element (FEM) models for GFRP-reinforced concrete columns under axial compression. Materials, 2021, 14(23): 7172

[41] Mirmiran A, Zagers K, Yuan W. Nonlinear finite element modeling of concrete confined by fiber composites. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2000, 35(1): 79–96

[42] Isleem H F, Jagadesh P, Ahmad J, Qaidi S, Althoey F, Najm H M, Sabri M M S. Finite element and analytical modelling of PVC-confined concrete columns under axial compression. Frontiers in Materials, 2022, 9: 1011675

[43] Isleem H F, Jagadesh P, Qaidi S, Althoey F, Rahmawati C, Najm H M, Sabri M M S. Finite element and theoretical investigations on PVC–CFRP confined concrete columns under axial compression. Frontiers in Materials, 2022, 9: 1055397

[44] Jha I, Pathak K K, Jha M, Ranjan A. A comparative study of gradient descent method and a novel non-gradient method for structural shape optimization. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 2022, 7(2): 258

[45] Agrahari R K, Jha I, Pathak K K. Seismic acceleration amplification factor for pin supported moment resisting RC frame structures for Chi-Chi earthquake. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 2022, 29(2): 189–200

[46] Jha I, Pathak K K. Synergetic concrete shape and cable layout optimization of pre-stressed concrete beams. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66(4): 87

[47] Jha I, Pathak K K. Fuzzy-based integrated zero-order shape optimization of steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams. Current Science, 2021, 121(7): 941–949

[48] Zhuang X, Guo H, Alajlan N, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics—A/Solids, 2021, 87: 104225

[49] Javvaji B, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Mortazavi B. Machine-learning-based exploration of bending flexoelectricity in novel 2D Van der Waals bilayers. Advanced Energy Materials, 2022, 12(32): 2201370

[50] Isleem H F, Tayeh B A, Abid M, Iqbal M, Mohamed A M, Sherbiny M G E. Finite element and artificial neural network modeling of FRP-RC columns under axial compression loading. Frontiers in Materials, 2022, 9: 888909

[51] Le T T. Practical machine learning-based prediction model for axial capacity of square CFST columns. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2022, 29(12): 1782–1797

[52] Isleem H F, Peng F, Tayeh B A. Confinement model for LRS FRP-confined concrete using conventional regression and artificial neural network techniques. Composite Structures, 2022, 279: 114779

[53] Isleem H F, Wang Z. Axial compressive stress–strain model developed for FRP-confined concrete columns with elliptical cross sections. Journal of Composites Science, 2018, 2(4): 67

[54] Guo H, Zhuang X, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Physics-informed deep learning for melting heat transfer analysis with model-based transfer learning. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2023, 143: 303–317

[55] GuoHZhuangXRabczukT. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. arXiv, 2021: 2102.02617

[56] Guo H, Zhuang X, Chen P, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38(6): 5173–5198

[57] Guo H, Zhuang X, Fu X, Zhu Y, Rabczuk T. Physics-informed deep learning for three-dimensional transient heat transfer analysis of functionally graded materials. Computational Mechanics, 2023, 72: 1–12

[58] Chen G, Wang Y, Yu T, Zhang B, Han B. Elliptical FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns: Axial behavior, interaction mechanism, and modeling. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2022, 26(6): 04022078

[59] DassaultSystèmes Simulia Corp.. Abaqus Theory Manual Version 6.11, 2011

[60] Schapire R E. The boosting approach to machine learning: An overview. Nonlinear Estimation and Classification, 2003, 171: 149–171

[61] Gupta K K, Kalita K, Ghadai R K, Ramachandran M, Gao X Z. Machine learning-based predictive modelling of biodiesel production—A comparative perspective. Energies, 2021, 14(4): 1122

[62] Cao Y, Miao Q G, Liu J C, Gao L. Advance and prospects of AdaBoost algorithm. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(6): 745–758

[63] Liang W, Luo S, Zhao G, Wu H. Predicting hard rock pillar stability using GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms. Mathematics, 2020, 8(5): 765

[64] Zeng H, Yang C, Zhang H, Wu Z, Zhang J, Dai G, Babiloni F, Kong W. A LightGBM-based EEG analysis method for driver mental states classification. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2019, 2019: 3761203

[65] Kodaz H, Özşen S, Arslan A, Güneş S. Medical application of information gain based artificial immune recognition system (AIRS): Diagnosis of thyroid disease. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(2): 3086–3092

[66] DorogushA VErshovVGulinA. CatBoost: Gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv, 2018: 1810.11363

[67] ProkhorenkovaLGusevGVorobevADorogushA VGulinA. CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018). Montréal: NeurIPS, 2018

[68] Dhananjay B, Sivaraman J. Analysis and classification of heart rate using CatBoost feature ranking model. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2021, 68: 102610

[69] Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32

[70] Isleem H F, Chukka N D K R, Bahrami A, Oyebisi S, Kumar R, Qiong T. Nonlinear finite element and analytical modelling of reinforced concrete filled steel tube columns under axial compression loading. Results in Engineering, 2023, 19: 101341

[71] Duro D C, Franklin S E, Dubé M G. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 118: 259–272

[72] Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by Random Forest. R News, 2002, 2(3): 18–22

[73] Kisvari A, Lin Z, Liu X. Wind power forecasting—A data-driven method along with gated recurrent neural network. Renewable Energy, 2021, 163: 1895–1909

[74] Ahmad M W, Mourshed M, Rezgui Y. Tree-based ensemble methods for predicting PV power generation and their comparison with support vector regression. Energy, 2018, 164: 465–474

[75] Gu B, Zhang T, Meng H, Zhang J. Short-term forecasting and uncertainty analysis of wind power based on long short-term memory, cloud model and non-parametric kernel density estimation. Renewable Energy, 2021, 164: 687–708

[76] Dong Y, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhou X. A novel hybrid model based on Bernstein polynomial with mixture of Gaussians for wind power forecasting. Applied Energy, 2021, 286: 116545

[77] Kumar R, Rai B, Samui P. Machine learning techniques for prediction of failure loads and fracture characteristics of high and ultra-high strength concrete beams. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2023, 8(8): 219

[78] Kumar R, Rai B, Samui P. A comparative study of prediction of compressive strength of ultra-high performance concrete using soft computing technique. Structural Concrete, 2023, 24(4): 5538–5555

[79] ChenTGuestrinC. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM Digital Library, 2016, 785–794

[80] HanKYuDTashevI. Speech emotion recognition using deep neural network and extreme learning machine. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference of International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Singapore: ISCA, 2014

[81] RoyS SMallikAGulatiRObaidatM SKrishnaP V. A deep learning based artificial neural network approach for intrusion detection. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference, ICMC 2017. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017, 44–53

[82] Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10(3): 282–290

[83] Kumar M, Biswas R, Kumar D R, Pradeep T, Samui P. Metaheuristic models for the prediction of bearing capacity of pile foundation. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2022, 31(2): 129–147

[84] Kumar D R, Samui P, Burman A. Prediction of probability of liquefaction using soft computing techniques. Journal of The Institution of Engineers: Series A, 2022, 103(4): 1195–1208

[85] Kumar D R, Samui P, Burman A. Prediction of probability of liquefaction using hybrid ANN with optimization techniques. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15(20): 1587

[86] Kardani N, Bardhan A, Samui P, Nazem M, Zhou A, Armaghani D J. A novel technique based on the improved firefly algorithm coupled with extreme learning machine (ELM-IFF) for predicting the thermal conductivity of soil. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38(4): 3321–3340

[87] GolbraikhATropshaA. Beware of q²! Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 2002, 20(4): 269–276

[88] Roy P P, Roy K. On some aspects of variable selection for partial least squares regression models. QSAR and Combinatorial Science, 2008, 27(3): 302–313

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Qujing Normal University Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project, No. S202310684035, Artificial Intelligence Numerical Simulation Analysis of FRP reinforced ultra-high performance concrete structures in a sustainable environment.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press