2.5-dimension soil seismic response to oblique incident waves based on exact free-field solution

Yeongbin Yang , Zeyang Zhou , Xiaoli Wang , Xiongfei Zhang , Zhilu Wang

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 216 -235.

PDF (9763KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 216 -235. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-024-1051-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE

2.5-dimension soil seismic response to oblique incident waves based on exact free-field solution

Author information +
History +
PDF (9763KB)

Abstract

With the three dimensional (3D) oblique incident waves exactly determined for the free field, the soil seismic responses in both frequency and time domains are studied by the 2.5 dimension (2.5D) finite/infinite element method. First, the free-field responses in frequency domain are solved exactly for 3D arbitrary incident P and SV waves, which requires no coordinate conversion or extra effort for SV waves with super-critical incident angles. Next, the earthquake spectra are incorporated by the concept of equivalent seismic forces on the near-field boundary, based only on the displacements input derived for unit ground accelerations of each frequency using the 2.5D approach. For the asymmetric 2.5D finite/infinite element model adopted, the procedure for soil seismic analysis is presented. The solutions computed by the proposed method are verified against those of Wolf’s and de Barros and Luco’s and for inversely calculated ground motions. Of interest is that abrupt variation in soil response occurs around the critical angle on the wave propagation plane for SV waves. In addition, the horizontal displacements attenuate with increasing horizontal incident angle, while the longitudinal ones increase inversely for 3D incident P and SV waves.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

3D oblique incident wave / seismic response analysis / 2.5D approach / infinite element / half-space

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yeongbin Yang, Zeyang Zhou, Xiaoli Wang, Xiongfei Zhang, Zhilu Wang. 2.5-dimension soil seismic response to oblique incident waves based on exact free-field solution. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 216-235 DOI:10.1007/s11709-024-1051-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sanchez-Sesma F J. Diffraction of elastic waves by three-dimensional surface irregularities. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1983, 73(6A): 1621–1636

[2]

Lee J J, Langston C A. Wave propagation in a three-dimensional circular basin. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1983, 73(6A): 1637–1653

[3]

Lee V W. Three-dimensional diffraction of plane P, SV & SH waves by a hemispherical alluvial valley. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1984, 3(3): 133–144

[4]

WolfJ P. Dynamic Soil−structure Interaction. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1985

[5]

Wong K C, Datta S K, Shah A H. Three-dimensional motion of buried pipeline. I: Analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1986, 112(12): 1319–1337

[6]

Luco J E, Wong H L. Seismic response of foundations embedded in a layered half-space. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1987, 15(2): 233–247

[7]

Moore I D, Guan F. Three-dimensional dynamic response of lined tunnels due to incident seismic waves. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1996, 25(4): 357–369

[8]

Liang J W, Ba Z. Exact dynamic stiffness matrices of 3-D layered site and its Green’s functions. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 5: 7–17

[9]

Zhang Z Q, Pan E. Time-harmonic response of transversely isotropic and layered poroelastic half-spaces under general buried loads. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 80: 426–453

[10]

Zhou J C, Pan E, Lin C P. A novel method for calculating dislocation Green’s functions and deformation in a transversely isotropic and layered elastic half-space. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2023, 152: 22–44

[11]

Bobet A, Yu H, Tiwari N. Seismic response of shallow circular openings to Rayleigh waves. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 135: 105036

[12]

Mossessian T K, Dravinski M. Amplification of elastic waves by a three dimensional valley. Part 1: Steady state response. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(5): 667–680

[13]

Mossessian T K, Dravinski M. Amplification of elastic waves by a three dimensional valley. Part 2: Transient response. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(5): 681–691

[14]

Luco J E, Wong H L, de Barros F C P. Three-dimensional response of a cylindrical canyon in a layered half-space. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(6): 799–817

[15]

de Barros F C P, Luco J E. Diffraction of obliquely incident waves by a cylindrical cavity embedded in a layered viscoelastic half-space. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1993, 12(3): 159–171

[16]

Luco J E, De Barros F C P. Seismic response of a cylindrical shell embedded in a layered viscoelastic half-space. I: Formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1994, 23(5): 553–567

[17]

Luco J E, De Barros F C P. Three-dimensional response of a layered cylindrical valley embedded in a layered half-space. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1995, 24(1): 109–125

[18]

Zhang L, Chopra A K. Three-dimensional analysis of spatially varying ground motions around a uniform canyon in a homogeneous half-space. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1991, 20(10): 911–926

[19]

Stamos A A, Beskos D E. Dynamic analysis of large 3-D underground structures by the BEM. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1995, 24(6): 917–934

[20]

Stamos A A, Beskos D E. 3-D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1996, 15(2): 111–118

[21]

Ba Z, Fu J, Liu Y, Lee V W, Wang Y. Scattering of elastic spherical P, SV, and SH waves by three-dimensional hill in a layered half-space. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 147: 106545

[22]

Liu J, Du Y, Du X, Wang Z, Wu J. 3D viscous-spring artificial boundary in time domain. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 5(1): 93–102

[23]

Liu J, Gu Y, Li B, Wang Y. An efficient method for the dynamic interaction of open structure-foundation systems. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2007, 1(3): 340–345

[24]

Du J, Lin G. Improved numerical method for time domain dynamic structure-foundation interaction analysis based on scaled boundary finite element method. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2008, 2(4): 336–342

[25]

Hatzigeorgiou G D, Beskos D E. Soil−structure interaction effects on seismic inelastic analysis of 3-D tunnels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(9): 851–861

[26]

Li P, Song E. Three-dimensional numerical analysis for the longitudinal seismic response of tunnels under an asynchronous wave input. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 63: 229–243

[27]

Liu J, Tan H, Bao X, Wang D, Li S. Seismic wave input method for three-dimensional soil−structure dynamic interaction analysis based on the substructure of artificial boundaries. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2019, 18(4): 747–758

[28]

Liu Z, Zhang M, Huang L, Zhang H. Broadband seismic isolation effect of three-dimensional seismic metamaterials in a semi-infinite foundation: Modelled by fast multipole indirect boundary element method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2023, 154: 7–20

[29]

Yin C, Li W H, Wang W. Evaluation of ground motion amplification effects in slope topography induced by the arbitrary directions of seismic waves. Energies, 2021, 14(20): 6744

[30]

Qiao H, Dai Z, Du X, Wang C, Long P, Jiao C. Parametric study of topographic effect on train-bridge interaction of a continuous rigid frame bridge during earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2023, 21(1): 125–149

[31]

UnglessR F. Infinite finite element. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1973

[32]

Bettess P. Infinite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1977, 11(1): 53–64

[33]

Zhao C, Valliappan S, Wang Y C. A numerical model for wave scattering problems in infinite media due to P- and SV-wave incidences. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1992, 33(8): 1661–1682

[34]

Zhao C, Valliappan S. Seismic wave scattering effects under different canyon topographic and geological conditions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1993, 12(3): 129–143

[35]

Zhao C, Valliappan S. Incident P and SV wave scattering effects under different canyon topographic and geological conditions. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1993, 17(2): 73–94

[36]

Yang Y B, Kuo S R, Hung H H. Frequency-independent infinite element for analyzing semi-infinite problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1996, 39(20): 3553–3569

[37]

Yun C B, Kim D K, Kim J M. Analytical frequency-dependent infinite elements for soil−structure interaction analysis in two-dimensional medium. Engineering Structures, 2000, 22(3): 258–271

[38]

Kim D K, Yun C B. Time-domain soil−structure interaction analysis in two-dimensional medium based on analytical frequency-dependent infinite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2000, 47(7): 1241–1261

[39]

Yang Y B, Hung H H, Lin K C, Cheng K W. Dynamic response of elastic half-space with cavity subjected to P and SV waves by finite/infinite element approach. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2015, 15(7): 1540009

[40]

Lin S Y, Hung H H, Yang J P, Yang Y B. Seismic analysis of twin tunnels by a finite/infinite element approach. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(9): 04017060

[41]

Yang Y B, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Wang X. Soil seismic analysis for 2D oblique incident waves using exact free-field responses by frequency-based finite/infinite element method. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(12): 1530–1551

[42]

Yang Y B, Zhang X, Zhou Z, Wang X, Li Z. Seismic analysis of a half-space containing a water- filled valley under 2D oblique incident waves by finite-infinite element method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2023, 169: 107872

[43]

Yang Y B, Hung H H A. 2. 5D finite/infinite element approach for modelling visco-elastic bodies subjected to moving loads. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 51(11): 1317–1336

[44]

Yang Y B, Hung H H, Chang D W. Train-induced wave propagation in layered soils using finite/infinite element simulation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 23(4): 263–278

[45]

Hung H H, Yang Y B, Chang D W. Wave barriers for reduction of train-induced vibrations in soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1283–1291

[46]

Lin K C, Hung H H, Yang J P, Yang Y B. Seismic analysis of underground tunnels by the 2.5D finite/infinite element approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 85: 31–43

[47]

Yang Y B, Ge P B, Li Q M, Liang X J, Wu Y T. 2.5D vibration of railway-side buildings mitigated by open or infilled trenches considering rail irregularity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 106: 204–214

[48]

Yang Y B, Liu S J, Li Q M, Ge P B. Stress waves in half-space due to moving train loads by 2.5D finite/infinite element approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 125: 105714

[49]

Yang Y B, Li P L, Chen W, Li J, Wu Y T. 2.5D formulation and analysis of a half-space subjected to internal loads moving at sub-and super-critical speeds. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 142: 106550

[50]

Xie W, Gao G, Song J, Wang Y. Ground vibration analysis under combined seismic and high-speed train loads. Underground Space, 2022, 7(3): 363–379

[51]

Romero A, Galvín P, António J, Domínguez J, Tadeu A. Modelling of acoustic and elastic wave propagation from underground structures using a 2.5D BEM-FEM approach. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2017, 76: 26–39

[52]

He C, Zhou S, Guo P, Di H, Zhang X. Modelling of ground vibration from tunnels in a poroelastic half-space using a 2.5-D FE-BE formulation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 211–221

[53]

Noori B, Arcos R, Clot A, Romeu J. A method based on 3D stiffness matrices in Cartesian coordinates for computation of 2.5D elastodynamic Green’s functions of layered half-spaces. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 114: 154–158

[54]

Ba Z, Fu Z, Liu Z, Sang Q A. 2.5D IBEM to investigate the 3D seismic response of 2D topographies in a multi-layered transversely isotropic half-space. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2020, 113: 382–401

[55]

Kausel E, de Oliveira Barbosa J M. Analysis of embankment underlain by elastic half-space: 2.5D model with paralongitudinal approximations to the half-space. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 155: 107090

[56]

Zhu J, Li X J, Liang J W. 2.5D FE-BE modelling of dynamic responses of segmented tunnels subjected to obliquely incident seismic waves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 163: 107564

[57]

Zhang Q, Zhao M, Huang J Q, Du X L, Zhang G L A. 2.5D finite element method combined with zigzag-paraxial boundary for long tunnel under obliquely incident seismic wave. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(9): 5743

[58]

Zhao C, Valliappan S. An efficient wave input procedure for infinite media. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1993, 9(5): 407–415

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (9763KB)

Supplementary files

FSC-23051-OF-YY_suppl_1

1676

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/