Machine learning based models for predicting compressive strength of geopolymer concrete

Abstract

Recently, great attention has been paid to geopolymer concrete due to its advantageous mechanical and environmentally friendly properties. Much effort has been made in experimental studies to advance the understanding of geopolymer concrete, in which compressive strength is one of the most important properties. To facilitate engineering work on the material, an efficient predicting model is needed. In this study, three machine learning (ML)-based models, namely deep neural network (DNN), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines (SVM), are developed for forecasting the compressive strength of the geopolymer concrete. A total of 375 experimental samples are collected from the literature to build a database for the development of the predicting models. A careful procedure for data preprocessing is implemented, by which outliers are examined and removed from the database and input variables are standardized before feeding to the fitting process. The standard K-fold cross-validation approach is applied for evaluating the performance of the models so that overfitting status is well managed, thus the generalizability of the models is ensured. The effectiveness of the models is assessed via statistical metrics including root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (R), and the recently proposed performance index (PI). The basic mean square error (MSE) is used as the loss function to be minimized during the model fitting process. The three ML-based models are successfully developed for estimating the compressive strength, for which good correlations between the predicted and the true values are obtained for DNN, KNN, and SVM. The numerical results suggest that the DNN model generally outperforms the other two models.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

geopolymer concrete / compressive strength prediction / machine-learning based model / deep neural network / K-nearest neighbor / support vector machines

References

[1] Davidovits J, Cordi S A. Synthesis of new high temperature geo-polymers for reinforced plastics/composites. In: Pacific Technical Conference and Technical Displays. Costa Mesa, CA: Society of Plastic Engineers, 1979,

[2] Khale D, Chaudhary R. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: A review. Journal of Materials Science, 2007, 42(3): 729–746

[3] K Farhan. Z. M. A. M. Johari, and R. Demirboğa, Assessment of important parameters involved in the synthesis of geopolymer composites: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 264: 120276

[4] Li Y, Min X, Ke Y, Liu D, Tang C. Preparation of red mud-based geopolymer materials from MSWI fly ash and red mud by mechanical activation. Waste Management, 2019, 83: 202–208

[5] Khan K A, Raut A, Chandrudu C R, Sashidhar C. Design and development of sustainable geopolymer using industrial copper by product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278: 123565

[6] Sun Q, Tian S, Sun Q, Li B, Cai C, Xia Y, Wei X, Mu Q. Preparation and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer paste backfill material. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 376–390

[7] Kiventerä J, Perumal P, Yliniemi J, Illikainen M. Mine tailings as a raw material in alkali activation: A review. International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials, 2020, 27(8): 1009–1020

[8] Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis J L, Lukey G C, Palomo A, Van Deventer J S J. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 2007, 42(9): 2917–2933

[9] Gartner E. Industrially interesting approaches to ‘low-CO₂’ cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(9): 1489–1498

[10] LloydN ARangan B V. Geopolymer concrete: A review of development and opportunities. In: Proceedings of 35th conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures. Singapore, 2010: 25–27

[11] Wang S, Liu B, Zhang Q, Wen Q, Lu X, Xiao K, Ekberg C, Zhang S. Application of geopolymers for treatment of industrial solid waste containing heavy metals: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 390: 136053

[12] Al-Azzawi M, Yu T, Hadi M N S. Factors affecting the bond strength between the fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and steel reinforcement. Structures, 2018, 14: 262–272

[13] Demie S, Nuruddin M F, Shafiq N. Effects of micro-structure characteristics of interfacial transition zone on the compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 41: 91–98

[14] Deb P S, Nath P, Sarker P K. The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Materials & Design, 2014, 62: 32–39

[15] Zhang H, Li L, Sarker P K, Long T, Shi X, Wang Q, Cai G. Investigating Various Factors Affecting the Long-Term Compressive Strength of Heat-Cured Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete and the Use of Orthogonal Experimental Design Method. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2019, 13(1): 63

[16] Castillo H, Collado H, Droguett T. Factors affecting the compressive strength of geopolymers: A review. Minerals, 2021, 11(12): 1317

[17] Assi L N, Deaver E, Elbatanouny M K, Ziehl P. Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 112: 807–815

[18] Nguyen K T, Ahn N, Le T A, Lee K. Theoretical and experimental study on mechanical properties and flexural strength of fly ash-geopolymer concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 106: 65–77

[19] Olivia M, Nikraz H. Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Materials & Design, 2012, 36: 191–198

[20] Shehab H K, Eisa A S, Wahba A M. Mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete with full and partial cement replacement. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 126: 560–565

[21] Gunasekara C, Law D W, Setunge S. Long term permeation properties of different fly ash geopolymer concretes. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 124: 352–362

[22] Sarker P K. Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Materials and Structures, 2011, 44: 1021–1030

[23] Farhan K Z, Johari M A M, Demirboğa R. Assessment of important parameters involved in the synthesis of geopolymer composites: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 264: 120276

[24] Sarker P K, Haque R, Ramgolam K V. Fracture behaviour of heat cured fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Materials & Design, 2013, 44: 580–586

[25] Noushini A, Aslani F, Castel A, Gilbert R I, Uy B, Foster S. Compressive stress−strain model for low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer and heat-cured Portland cement concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 73: 136–146

[26] Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S. Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 135: 430–439

[27] RanganB V. Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Perth: Curtin University of Technology, 2008

[28] FerdousM WKayali OKhennaneA. A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the fourth Asia-Pacific conference on FRP in structures. Melbourne: APFIS, 2013: 11–13

[29] Pavithra P, Srinivasula Reddy M, Dinakar P, Hanumantha Rao B, Satpathy B K, Mohanty A N. A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133: 117–125

[30] Mohammed A A, Ahmed H U, Mosavi A. Survey of mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review and data analysis. Materials, 2021, 14(16): 4690

[31] Li N, Shi C, Zhang Z, Khennane A. A review on mixture design methods for geopolymer concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 178: 107490

[32] Nariman N A, Hamdia K, Ramadan A M, Sadaghian H. Optimum design of flexural strength and stiffness for reinforced concrete beams using machine learning. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(18): 8762

[33] Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh V M, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790

[34] GuoHZhuangX RabczukT. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. 2021, arXiv: 2102.02617

[35] Guo H, Zhuang X, Chen P, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38(6): 5173–5198

[36] Zhuang X, Guo H, Alajlan N, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2021, 87: 104225

[37] Ben Chaabene W, Flah M, Nehdi M L. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 260: 119889

[38] Van Dao D, Ly H B, Trinh S H, Le T T, Pham B T. Artificial intelligence approaches for prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Materials, 2019, 12(6): 983

[39] Nguyen K T, Nguyen Q D, Le T A, Shin J, Lee K. Analyzing the compressive strength of green fly ash based geopolymer concrete using experiment and machine learning approaches. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 247: 118581

[40] Shahmansouri A A, Yazdani M, Ghanbari S, Akbarzadeh Bengar H, Jafari A, Farrokh Ghatte H. Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123697

[41] Gupta T, Rao M C. Prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques. Structural Concrete, 2022, 23(5): 3073–3090

[42] Rahmati M, Toufigh V. Evaluation of geopolymer concrete at high temperatures: An experimental study using machine learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 372: 133608

[43] Ahmad A, Ahmad W, Chaiyasarn K, Ostrowski K A, Aslam F, Zajdel P, Joyklad P. Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms. Polymers, 2021, 13(19): 3389

[44] Emarah D A. Compressive strength analysis of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete using machine learning approaches. Results in Materials, 2022, 16: 100347

[45] Ahmad A, Ahmad W, Aslam F, Joyklad P. Compressive strength prediction of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete via advanced machine learning techniques. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 16: e00840

[46] Peng Y, Unluer C. Analyzing the mechanical performance of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with different machine learning techniques. Construction & Building Materials, 2022, 316: 125785

[47] BaJ LKiros J RHintonG E. Layer normalization. 2016, arXiv:1607.06450

[48] Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2014, 15(1): 1929–1958

[49] Gandomi A H, Roke D A. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools. Advances in Engineering Software, 2015, 88: 63–72

[50] Rodríguez J D, Pérez A, Lozano J A. Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(3): 569–575

[51] KingmaD PBa J L. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015—Conference Track Proceedings. San Diego, CA: NFDI, 2015

[52] AgarapA F. Deep learning using rectified linear units (Relu). 2018, arXiv:1803.08375

[53] Hamdia K M, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications, 2021, 33(6): 1923–1933

[54] ChenTGuestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016: 785–794

[55] KeGMengQ FinleyTWang TChenWMaWYeQ LiuT Y. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30

[56] DorogushA VErshov VGulinA. CatBoost: Gradient boosting with categorical features support. 2018, arXiv:1810.11363

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press