Application of extreme gradient boosting in predicting the viscoelastic characteristics of graphene oxide modified asphalt at medium and high temperatures

Huong-Giang Thi HOANG, Hai-Van Thi MAI, Hoang Long NGUYEN, Hai-Bang LY

PDF(16016 KB)
PDF(16016 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6) : 899-917. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-024-1025-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Application of extreme gradient boosting in predicting the viscoelastic characteristics of graphene oxide modified asphalt at medium and high temperatures

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Complex modulus (G*) is one of the important criteria for asphalt classification according to AASHTO M320-10, and is often used to predict the linear viscoelastic behavior of asphalt binders. In addition, phase angle (φ) characterizes the deformation resilience of asphalt and is used to assess the ratio between the viscous and elastic components. It is thus important to quickly and accurately estimate these two indicators. The purpose of this investigation is to construct an extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model to predict G* and φ of graphene oxide (GO) modified asphalt at medium and high temperatures. Two data sets are gathered from previously published experiments, consisting of 357 samples for G* and 339 samples for φ, and these are used to develop the XGB model using nine inputs representing the asphalt binder components. The findings show that XGB is an excellent predictor of G* and φ of GO-modified asphalt, evaluated by the coefficient of determination R2 (R2 = 0.990 and 0.9903 for G* and φ, respectively) and root mean square error (RMSE = 31.499 and 1.08 for G* and φ, respectively). In addition, the model’s performance is compared with experimental results and five other machine learning (ML) models to highlight its accuracy. In the final step, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) value analysis is conducted to assess the impact of each input and the correlation between pairs of important features on asphalt’s two physical properties.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

complex modulus / phase angle / graphene oxide / asphalt / extreme gradient boosting / machine learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huong-Giang Thi HOANG, Hai-Van Thi MAI, Hoang Long NGUYEN, Hai-Bang LY. Application of extreme gradient boosting in predicting the viscoelastic characteristics of graphene oxide modified asphalt at medium and high temperatures. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(6): 899‒917 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1025-y

References

[1]
Hu K, Yu C, Yang Q, Chen Y, Chen G, Ma R. Multi-scale enhancement mechanisms of graphene oxide on styrene-butadiene-styrene modified asphalt: An exploration from molecular dynamics simulations. Materials and Design, 2021, 208: 109901
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Anurag K, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S N. Laboratory investigation of indirect tensile strength using roofing polyester waste fibers in hot mix asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(5): 2035–2040
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Putman B J, Amirkhanian S N. Utilization of waste fibers in stone matrix asphalt mixtures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2004, 42(3): 265–274
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Sengoz B, Isikyakar G. Analysis of styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer modified bitumen using fluorescent microscopy and conventional test methods. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 150(2): 424–432
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Shen J, Amirkhanian S, Xiao F, Tang B. Influence of surface area and size of crumb rubber on high temperature properties of crumb rubber modified binders. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(1): 304–310
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Xiao F, Amirkhanian S N, Shen J, Putman B. Influences of crumb rubber size and type on reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(2): 1028–1034
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Cao W. Study on properties of recycled tire rubber modified asphalt mixtures using dry process. Construction and Building Materials, 2007, 21(5): 1011–1015
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Sun Y, Luo Y, Jia D. Preparation and properties of natural rubber nanocomposites with solid-state organomodified montmorillonite. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2008, 107(5): 2786–2792
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Zhang H, Wang Y, Wu Y, Zhang L, Yang J. Study on flammability of montmorillonite/styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2005, 97(3): 844–849
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Zhang B, Xi M, Zhang D, Zhang H, Zhang B. The effect of styrene-butadiene-rubber/montmorillonite modification on the characteristics and properties of asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(10): 3112–3117
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Yildirim Y. Polymer modified asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 2007, 21(1): 66–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Xiao F, Amirkhanian A N, Amirkhanian S N. Long-term ageing influence on rheological characteristics of asphalt binders containing carbon nanoparticles. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2011, 12(6): 533–541
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Amirkhanian A N, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S N. Characterization of unaged asphalt binder modified with carbon nano particles. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2011, 4(5): 281–286
[14]
Goli A, Ziari H, Amini A. Influence of carbon nanotubes on performance properties and storage stability of SBS modified asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017, 29(8): 04017070
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Abdullah M E, Zamhari K A, Hainin M R, Oluwasola E A, Hassan N A, Yusoff N I M. Engineering properties of asphalt binders containing nanoclay and chemical warm-mix asphalt additives. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 112: 232–240
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
de Melo J V S, Trichês G. Evaluation of properties and fatigue life estimation of asphalt mixture modified by organophilic nanoclay. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 140: 364–373
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
El-Shafie M, Ibrahim I M, Abd El Rahman A M M. The addition effects of macro and nano clay on the performance of asphalt binder. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 2012, 21(2): 149–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
You Z, Mills-Beale J, Foley J M, Roy S, Odegard G M, Dai Q, Goh S W. Nanoclay-modified asphalt materials: Preparation and characterization. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(2): 1072–1078
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Khattak M J, Khattab A, Rizvi H R, Zhang P. The impact of carbon nano-fiber modification on asphalt binder rheology. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 30: 257–264
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
KhattakM JKhattabARizviH R. Mechanistic characteristics of asphalt binder and asphalt matrix modified with nano-fibers. Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, 2011: 4812–4822
[21]
Arabani M, Faramarzi M. Characterization of CNTs-modified HMA’s mechanical properties. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 83: 207–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
ZhouH YZhangL. Study on physical and rheological properties of graphene oxide compounded SBS modified asphalt. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2021, 38(1): 10−18 (in Chinese)
[23]
GaoW. Graphene Oxide: Reduction Recipes, Spectroscopy, and Applications. Luxembourg: Springer, 2015
[24]
Liu K, Zhu J, Zhang K, Wu J, Yin J, Shi X. Effects of mixing sequence on mechanical properties of graphene oxide and warm mix additive composite modified asphalt binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 217: 301–309
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Zhu J, Zhang K, Liu K, Shi X. Adhesion characteristics of graphene oxide modified asphalt unveiled by surface free energy and AFM-scanned micro-morphology. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 244: 118404
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Duan S, Li J, Muhammad Y, Su Z, Meng F, Yang H, Yao X. Synthesis and evaluation of high-temperature properties of butylated graphene oxide composite incorporated SBS (C4H9-GO/SBS)-modified asphalt. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136(46): 48231
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zeng W, Wu S, Pang L, Sun Y, Chen Z. The utilization of graphene oxide in traditional construction materials: Asphalt. Materials, 2017, 10(1): 48
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Li Y, Wu S, Amirkhanian S. Investigation of the graphene oxide and asphalt interaction and its effect on asphalt pavement performance. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 165: 572–584
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wu S, Zhao Z, Li Y, Pang L, Amirkhanian S, Riara M. Evaluation of aging resistance of graphene oxide modified asphalt. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(7): 702
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Nguyen H Q, Ly H B, Tran V Q, Nguyen T A, Le T T, Pham B T. Optimization of artificial intelligence system by evolutionary algorithm for prediction of axial capacity of rectangular concrete filled steel tubes under compression. Materials, 2020, 13(5): 1205
[31]
NguyenT ALyH B. Prediction of critical elastic buckling load of cellular H-section beams using support vector machine. Transport and Communications Science Journal, 2020, 71(5): 500−513 (in Vietnamese)
[32]
LyH BNguyenT A. Artificial neural network based modeling of the axial capacity of rectangular concrete filled steel tubes. Transport and Communications Science Journal, 2020, 71(2): 154−166 (in Vietnamese)
[33]
Baldo N, Manthos E, Miani M. Stiffness modulus and marshall parameters of hot mix asphalts: Laboratory data modeling by artificial neural networks characterized by cross-validation. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(17): 3502
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Daneshvar D, Behnood A. Estimation of the dynamic modulus of asphalt concretes using random forests algorithm. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2022, 23(2): 250–260
[35]
Behnood A, Golafshani E M. Predicting the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture using machine learning techniques: An application of multi biogeography-based programming. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 266: 120983
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Barugahare J, Amirkhanian A N, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S N. Predicting the dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt mixtures using bagged trees ensemble. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260: 120468
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Behnood A, Daneshvar D. A machine learning study of the dynamic modulus of asphalt concretes: An application of M5P model tree algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 120544
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Gong H, Sun Y, Dong Y, Han B, Polaczyk P, Hu W, Huang B. Improved estimation of dynamic modulus for hot mix asphalt using deep learning. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 263: 119912
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Hussain F, Ali Y, Irfan M, Ashraf M, Ahmed S. A data-driven model for phase angle behaviour of asphalt concrete mixtures based on convolutional neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 269: 121235
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Majidifard H, Jahangiri B, Rath P, Contreras L U, Buttlar W G, Alavi A H. Developing a prediction model for rutting depth of asphalt mixtures using gene expression programming. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 267: 120543
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Gong H, Sun Y, Shu X, Huang B. Use of random forests regression for predicting IRI of asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 189: 890–897
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Abdelaziz N, Abd El-Hakim R T, El-Badawy S M, Afify H A. International Roughness Index prediction model for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2020, 21(1): 88–99
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Xiao F, Amirkhanian S, Juang C H. Prediction of fatigue life of rubberized asphalt concrete mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement using artificial neural networks. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2009, 21(6): 253–261
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Golzar K, Jalali-Arani A, Nematollahi M. Statistical investigation on physical–mechanical properties of base and polymer modified bitumen using artificial neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 37: 822–831
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Specht L, Khatchatourian O. Application of artificial intelligence to modelling asphalt-rubber viscosity. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2014, 15(9): 799–809
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Momeni E, He B, Abdi Y, Armaghani D J. Novel hybrid XGBoost model to forecast soil shear strength based on some soil index tests. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2023, 136(3): 2527–2550
[47]
Zhou J, Qiu Y, Zhu S, Armaghani D J, Khandelwal M, Mohamad E T. Estimation of the TBM advance rate under hard rock conditions using XGBoost and Bayesian optimization. Underground Space, 2021, 6(5): 506–515
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Yari M, Armaghani D J, Maraveas C, Ejlali A N, Mohamad E T, Asteris P G. Several tree-based solutions for predicting flyrock distance due to mine blasting. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(3): 1345
[49]
Li D, Liu Z, Armaghani D J, Xiao P, Zhou J. Novel ensemble tree solution for rockburst prediction using deep forest. Mathematics, 2022, 10(5): 787
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Asteris P G, Rizal F I M, Koopialipoor M, Roussis P C, Ferentinou M, Armaghani D J, Gordan B. Slope stability classification under seismic conditions using several tree-based intelligent techniques. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(3): 1753
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Huat C Y, Moosavi S M H, Mohammed A S, Armaghani D J, Ulrikh D V, Monjezi M, Hin Lai S. Factors influencing pile friction bearing capacity: Proposing a novel procedure based on gradient boosted tree technique. Sustainability, 2021, 13(21): 11862
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Mukaka M M. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal: The Journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 2012, 24(3): 69–71
[53]
Wang R, Yue J, Li R, Sun Y. Evaluation of aging resistance of asphalt binder modified with graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2019, 31(11): 04019274
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Habib N Z, Aun N C, Zoorob S E, Lee P I. Use of graphene oxide as a bitumen modifier: An innovative process optimization study. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1105: 365–369
[55]
ChenT QGuestrinC. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, 785–794
[56]
Baturynska I, Martinsen K. Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: Comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2021, 32(1): 179–200
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
LundbergS MLeeS I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017). Long Beach: NeurIPS, 2017
[58]
Yang L, Shami A. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice. Neurocomputing, 2020, 415: 295–316
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Zhang W, Wu C, Zhong H, Li Y, Wang L. Prediction of undrained shear strength using extreme gradient boosting and random forest based on Bayesian optimization. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(1): 469–477
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Hosseini A S, Hajikarimi P, Gandomi M, Nejad F M, Gandomi A H. Genetic programming to formulate viscoelastic behavior of modified asphalt binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 286: 122954
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Liu K, Zhang K, Shi X. Performance evaluation and modification mechanism analysis of asphalt binders modified by graphene oxide. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 163: 880–889
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(16016 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/