Analysis of load and adaptability of disc cutters during shield tunneling in soft–hard varied strata

Abstract

The disc cutters of shield machines exhibit unsatisfactory adaptability and performance during the soft–hard varied strata tunneling process. To analyze the rotation state, cutting performance, and adaptability of disc cutters during shield tunneling in soft–hard varied strata, the Holmquist Johnson Cook and Federal Highway Administration constitutive models are introduced to numerically simulate the failure process of materials on the excavation face and to calculate the load of disc cutters. Additionally, the parameters of the models are modified based on laboratory disc cutter excavation test results. The results of numerical calculation can reflect the load level and the behavior of the disc cutters during operation. The tangential loads of the disc cutters during the cutting of four typical soft-strata excavation face models are numerically calculated, thus providing reference values for the starting torque of the disc cutters. A greater penetration is suggested for soft-strata tunneling to allow the disc cutters to rotate smoothly and continuously as well as to guarantee a better cutting effect. The disc cutters in the center of the cutterhead should be specified with a lower starting torque to prevent uneven wear, rotation stagnation, cutterhead clogging, and other adverse phenomena.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

shield tunneling / disc cutter load / laboratory excavation test / numerical calculation / soft–hard varied strata

References

[1] Liao S M, Peng F L, Shen S L. Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(4): 421–430

[2] Shen S L, Xu Y S. Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(9): 1378–1392

[3] Jin D L, Yuan D J, Li X G, Zheng H T. An in-tunnel grouting protection method for excavating twin tunnels beneath an existing tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 27–35

[4] Jin D L, Yuan D J, Li X G, Zheng H T. Analysis of the settlement of an existing tunnel induced by shield tunnelling underneath. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 209–220

[5] Yagiz S, Karahan H. Application of various optimization techniques and comparison of their performances for predicting TBM penetration rate in rock mass. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 80: 308–315

[6] Min F L, Du J R, Zhang N, Chen X G, Lv H J, Liu L C, Yu C J. Experimental study on property change of slurry and filter cake of slurry shield under seawater intrusion. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 88: 290–299

[7] ZhuWQianY JMinF LWangLWangCXuCHuJ N. The current status and some problems of slurry shield in China. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(5): 724−735 (in Chinese)

[8] Sun W, Shi M L, Zhang C Z, Zhao J, Song X. Dynamic load prediction of tunnel boring machine (TBM) based on heterogeneous in-situ data. Automation in Construction, 2018, 92(8): 23–34

[9] YangYLiX G. Review on the issue of clogging occurred in shield tunnelling. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(S2): 1030−1038 (in Chinese)

[10] ZhangN C. Analysis of wear shape of disc-cutter edge of TBM/shield and optimization measures. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(4): 657−665 (in Chinese)

[11] ZhuW BJuS J. Technology for Shield Tunnelling in Mixed Face Ground Condition. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2006 (in Chinese)

[12] Ren D J, Shen S L, Arulrajah A, Cheng W C. Prediction model of TBM disc cutter wear during tunnelling in heterogeneous ground. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(11): 3599–3611

[13] Ren D J, Shen S L, Zhou A, Chai J C. Prediction of lateral continuous wear of cutter ring in soft ground with quartz sand. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 103: 86–92

[14] LiX GLiX CYuanD J. Application of an interval wear analysis method to cutting tools used in tunnelling shields in soft ground. Wear, 2017, 392–393: 21–28

[15] Evans I. The force required to cut coal with blunt wedges. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1965, 2(1): 1–12

[16] Nishimatsu Y. The mechanics of rock cutting. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1972, 9(2): 261–270

[17] Yang H Q, Wang H, Zhou X P. Analysis on the damage behavior of mixed ground during TBM cutting process. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57(Aug): 55–65

[18] Snowdon R A, Ryley M D, Temporal J, Crabb G I. The effect of hydraulic stiffness on tunnel boring machine performance. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1983, 20(5): 203–214

[19] Sanio H P. Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropic rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1985, 22(3): 153–161

[20] Rostami J, Ozdemir L. New model for performance production of hard rock TBMs. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference. Boston: Energy Data Base, 1993, 793–809

[21] Cho J W, Jeon S, Jeong H Y, Chang S H. Evaluation of cutting efficiency during TBM disc cutter excavation within a Korean granitic rock using linear-cutting-machine testing and photogrammetric measurement. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 35: 37–54

[22] Pan Y C, Liu Q S, Liu J P, Peng X X, Kong X X. Full-scale linear cutting tests in Chongqing sandstone to study the influence of confining stress on rock cutting forces by TBM disc cutter. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(6): 1697–1713

[23] GongQ MMiaoC TMaH SZhaoX B. Effect of joint spacing on rock breaking under disc cutter by linear cutting experiments. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(6): 97–105 (in Chinese)

[24] Martin E, Lorenz S, Galler R. Tunnel boring machine performance prediction with scaled rock cutting tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 70(9): 450–459

[25] WuFYinL JZhangHGongQ M. Rock fragmentation mechanism and efficiency under inserted-tooth roller cutter by rotary cutting test. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(10): 150−159 (in Chinese)

[26] Geng Q, Wei Z Y, Meng H. An experimental research on the rock cutting process of the gage cutters for rock tunnel boring machine (TBM). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 52: 182–191

[27] Geng Q, Wei Z Y, Meng H, Macias F J. Mechanical performance of TBM cutterhead in mixed rock ground conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 76–84

[28] Geng Q, He F, Ma M X, Liu X H, Wang X B, Zhang Z Y, Ye M. Application of full-scale experimental cutterhead system to study penetration performance of tunnel boring machines (TBMs). Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(8): 4673–4696

[29] LiuH YKouS QLindqvistP ATangC A. Numerical modelling of the heterogeneous rock fracture process using various test techniques. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40(2): 107−144 (in Chinese)

[30] SuW LLiX GXuYJinD L. Numerical simulation of shield tool cutting concrete based on HJC model. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(6): 1106−1114 (in Chinese)

[31] TanQYiN EXiaY MXuZ JZhuYSongJ H. Research on rock dynamic fragmentation characteristics by TBM cutters and cutter spacing optimization. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(12): 2453−2464 (in Chinese)

[32] Haeri H, Marji M F, Shahriar K. Simulating the effect of disc erosion in TBM disc cutters by a semi-infinite DDM. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(6): 3915–3927

[33] Haeri H, Marji M F. Simulating the crack propagation and cracks coalescence underneath TBM disc cutters. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9(2): 124

[34] Ren D J, Shen J S, Chai J C, Zhou A. Analysis of disc cutter failure in shield tunnelling using 3D circular cutting theory. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 90: 23–35

[35] Wen S, Wu F, Li S, Zhang L M. Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation efficiency of TBM disc cutter under different lateral pressure coefficient and rock strength. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2021, 3(4): 9–19

[36] Holmquist T J, Johnson G R. A computational constitutive model for glass subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 78(5): 051003

[37] LewisB A. Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147 (No. FHWA-HRT-04-095). 2004

[38] Simo J C, Ju J W. Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—I. Formulation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1987, 23(7): 821–840

[39] Simo J C, Ju J W. Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—II. Computational aspects. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1987, 23(7): 841–869

[40] Ju J W. On energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage theories: Constitutive modeling and computational aspects. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(7): 803–833

[41] Ju J W. Energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage models at finite strains. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1989, 115(11): 2507–2525

[42] Murray Y D. Modeling rate effects in rock and concrete. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures. Washington, D.C., 1997, 65–79

[43] GB/T50081-2002. Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2002 (in Chinese)

[44] JGJ55-2011. Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011 (in Chinese)

[45] JGJ/T98-2010. Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Masonry Mortar. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010 (in Chinese)

[46] GB/T50123-2019. Standard for Soil Test Method. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFF0426370) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51978040).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press