Dynamic performance of submerged floating tunnel with different mooring styles subjected to anchor cable failure

Zhiwen WU, Chuhan ZHANG, Liwang MOU, Guoxiong MEI, Ankit GARG

PDF(27139 KB)
PDF(27139 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (10) : 1443-1464. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-023-0932-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dynamic performance of submerged floating tunnel with different mooring styles subjected to anchor cable failure

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Submerged floating tunnels (SFTs) are novel structures for transportation across long- and deep-strait regions. Owing to severe wave and current excitation as well as the effects of underwater structures and corrosion, the risk of local anchor cable failure is high, which can result in the progressive failure of the entire structure. In this study, experimental and numerical investigations are conducted to analyze the dynamic behavior of an SFT with different mooring styles under local cable failure. A custom-designed cable failure device and the birth-and-death element method are used to simulate cable failure (i.e., progressive failure) via experiments and numerical simulation, respectively. A physical-scale segmental model of an SFT with different mooring styles under anchor cable failure is developed in this study. A segmental and entire-length mathematical model is developed using the ANSYS program to perform the numerical simulation. The results of the segmental numerical and experimental models indicate good agreement. The dynamic response of an SFT with different mooring styles under cable failure is comprehensively investigated by investigating the effects of key parameters (wave period, buoyant weight ratio, and cable failure mechanism). Moreover, the progressive failure of the SFT under cable failure is investigated via a segment model test and a numerical simulation of its entire length. The present study can serve as a reference for the safer designs of the SFT mooring style.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

dynamic behaviors / submerged floating tunnel / cable failure / mooring style / progressive failure

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhiwen WU, Chuhan ZHANG, Liwang MOU, Guoxiong MEI, Ankit GARG. Dynamic performance of submerged floating tunnel with different mooring styles subjected to anchor cable failure. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 1443‒1464 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0932-7

References

[1]
Jiang B, Liang B, Wu S. Feasibility study on the submerged floating tunnel in Qiongzhou strait, China. Polish Maritime Research, 2018, 25(s2): 4–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Minoretti A, Xiang X, Johansen I, Eidem M. The future of the tunnel crossing: The submerged floating tube bridge. Structural Engineering International, 2020, 30(4): 493–497
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Dong M, Miao G, Yong L, Niu Z, Pang H, Hou C. Effect of escape device for Submerged Floating Tunnel (SFT) on hydrodynamic loads applied to SFT. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(4): 609–616
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Zhang H, Yang Z, Li J, Yuan C, Xie M, Yang H, Yin H. A global review for the hydrodynamic response investigation method of submerged floating tunnels. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 225: 108825
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Lu W, Ge F, Wu X, Hong Y. Nonlinear dynamics of a submerged floating moored structure by incremental harmonic balance method with FFT. Marine Structures, 2013, 31: 63–81
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Seo S, Mun H, Lee J, Kim J. Simplified analysis for estimation of the behavior of a submerged floating tunnel in waves and experimental verification. Marine Structures, 2015, 44: 142–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Cantero D, Ronnquist A, Naess A. Tension during parametric excitation in submerged vertical taut tethers. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 65: 279–289
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Naik M, Zahid U, Dong-Ho C. Performance evaluation of submerged floating tunnel subjected to hydrodynamic and seismic excitations. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(11): 1–17
[9]
Luo G, Pan S, Zhang Y, Ren Y, Xiong K. Displacement response of submerged floating tunnel with flexible boundary under explosion load. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(2): 346–358
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Chen X, Chen Q, Chen Z, Cai S, Zhuo X, Lv J. Numerical modeling of the interaction between submerged floating tunnel and surface waves. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 220: 108494
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Xie J, Chen J. Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnel-canyon water system under earthquakes. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2021, 94: 757–779
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Lee J, Jin C, Kim M. Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnels by wave and seismic excitations. Ocean Systems Engineering, 2017, 7(1): 1–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
LiuYJinRGengBZhangHRenC. Influence of anchor cable inclination angle on motion response of submerged floating tunnel with different section. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 35(2): 237−247 (in Chinese)
[14]
Xiang Y, Chen Z, Bai B, Lin H, Yang Y. Mechanical behaviors and experimental study of submerged floating tunnel subjected to local anchor-cable failure. Engineering Structures, 2020, 212: 110521
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Zhou Y, Chen S. Numerical investigation of cable breakage events on long-span cable-stayed bridges under stochastic traffic and wind. Engineering Structures, 2015, 105: 299–315
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Minaei A, Daneshjoo F, Goicolea J. Experimental and numerical study on cable breakage equivalent force in cable-stayed structures consisting of low-relaxation seven-wire steel strands. Structures, 2020, 27: 595–606
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wu G, Qiu W, Wu T. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 97: 701–717
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Bae Y, Kim M, Kim H. Performance changes of a floating offshore wind turbine with broken mooring line. Renewable Energy, 2017, 101: 364–375
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Jakobsen B. Design of the submerged floating tunnel operating under various conditions. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 4: 71–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Wu Z, Wang D, Ke W, Qin Y, Lu F, Jiang M. Experimental investigation for the dynamic behavior of submerged floating tunnel subjected to the combined action of earthquake, wave and current. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 239(1): 109911
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wu Z, Yang S, Tang L, Ma H, Mou L, Xiao Y. Experimental investigation and analysis for hydrodynamic behaviours and progressive collapse phenomenon of submerged floating tunnel under anchor cables’ breakage. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(9): 1924–1938
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
SubmergedFloating Tunnel StructuralDesignJoint Team of Tackling Technological Problems. Submerged Floating Tunnel Engineering and Technology Research Introduction. Beijing: Science Press, 2019 (in Chinese)
[23]
Kanie S. Feasibility studies on various SFT in Japan and their technological evaluation. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 4: 13–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Larssen R, Jakobsen S. Submerged floating tunnels for crossing of wide and deep fjords. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 4: 171–178
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Yang Z, Huang B, Kang A, Zhu B, Han J, Yin R, Li X. Experimental study on the solitary wave-current interaction and the combined forces on a vertical cylinder. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 236: 109569
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Chen J, Li J, Sun S, Su Z. Experimental and numerical analysis of submerged floating tunnel. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(10): 2949–2957
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
LinWLiuMZhouZChenJYangZZhangJ. Relevant issues about real stiffness of submerged floating tunnel section-model. China Harbour Engineering, 2020, 40(2): 31−37 (in Chinese)
[28]
Morison J R, Johnson J W, Schaaf S A. The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1950, 2(5): 149–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wang X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Liu H. Numerical and experimental study on loaded suspendome subjected to sudden cable failure. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 137: 358–371
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Mozos C, Aparicio A. Numerical and experimental study on the interaction cable structure during the failure of a stay in a cable stayed bridge. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(8): 2330–2341
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Starossek U. Typology of progressive collapse. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(9): 2302–2307
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52268061, 51808136, and 51878185), China Scholarship Council (No. 201906660001), Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Funds (No. 2019AC20264), and Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (No. 2018JJB160058).

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(27139 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/