Effect of cutterhead configuration on tunnel face stability during shield machine maintenance outages
Yinzun YANG, Dajun YUAN, Dalong JIN
Effect of cutterhead configuration on tunnel face stability during shield machine maintenance outages
Owing to long-distance advancement or obstacles, shield tunneling machines are typically shut down for maintenance. Engineering safety during maintenance outages is determined by the stability of the tunnel face. Pressure maintenance openings are typically used under complicated hydrogeological conditions. The tunnel face is supported by a medium at the bottom of the excavation chamber and compressed air at the top. Owing to the high risk of face failure, the necessity of support pressure when cutterhead support is implemented and a method for determining the value of compressed air pressure using different support ratios must to be determined. In this study, a non-fully chamber supported rotational failure model considering cutterhead support is developed based on the upper-bound theorem of limit analysis. Numerical simulation is conducted to verify the accuracy of the proposed model. The results indicate that appropriately increasing the specific gravity of the supporting medium can reduce the risk of collapse. The required compressed air pressure increases significantly as the support ratio decreases. Disregarding the supporting effect of the cutterhead will result in a tunnel face with underestimated stability. To satisfy the requirement of chamber openings at atmospheric pressure, the stratum reinforcement strength and range at the shield end are provided based on different cutterhead aperture ratios.
tunnel face stability / cutterhead configuration / aperture ratio / pressure gradient / support ratio
[1] |
Hu X, Zhang Z, Kieffer S. A real-life stability model for a large shield-driven tunnel in heterogeneous soft soils. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2012, 6(2): 176–187
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Geng Z, Jin D, Yuan D. Face stability analysis of cohesion-frictional soils considering the soil arch effect and the instability failure process. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 153: 105050
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Liu X X, Shen S L, Xu Y S, Yin Z Y. Analytical approach for time-dependent groundwater inflow into shield tunnel face in confined aquifer. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 42(4): 655–673
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Liu X X, Shen S L, Zhou A, Xu Y S. Evaluation of foam conditioning effect on groundwater inflow at tunnel cutting face. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2019, 43(2): 463–481
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Ren D J, Shen S L, Chai J C, Zhou A. Analysis of disc cutter failure in shield tunnelling using 3D circular cutting theory. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 90: 23–35
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Ren D J, Shen S L, Arulrajah A, Cheng W C. Prediction model of TBM disc cutter wear during tunnelling in heterogeneous ground. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(11): 3599–3611
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Elbaz K, Shen S L, Zhou A, Yin Z Y, Lyu H M. Prediction of disc cutter life during shield tunneling with AI via the incorporation of a genetic algorithm into a GMDH-type neural network. Engineering (Beijing), 2021, 7(2): 238–251
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Lyu H M, Shen S L, Zhou A, Yin Z Y. Assessment of safety status of shield tunnelling using operational parameters with enhanced SPA. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 123: 104428
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Zhang X, Tang S, Wu J, Chen P, Tang J, Tu X. Prediction and analysis of abrasiveness of dense sandy stratum by slurry shield at Sutong GIL utility tunnel engineering. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(5): 1364–1373
|
[10] |
Zhang W, Koizumi A. Behavior of composite segment for shield tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(4): 325–332
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Tan X, Chen W, Wu G, Wang L, Yang J. A structural health monitoring system for data analysis of segment joint opening in an underwater shield tunnel. Structural Health Monitoring, 2020, 19(4): 1032–1050
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
WeiZFanluMZhanhuYDaiweiWTengJ. Technical status and case study on intervention in the shield chamber. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015, 52(1): 9−18 (in Chinese)
|
[13] |
Rezaei A H, Shirzehhagh M, Golpasand M R B. EPB tunneling in cohesionless soils: A study on Tabriz Metro settlements. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 19(2): 153–165
|
[14] |
Xue Y, Li X, Qiu D, Ma X, Kong F, Qu C, Zhao Y. Stability evaluation for the excavation face of shield tunnel across the Yangtze River by multi-factor analysis. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 19(3): 283–293
|
[15] |
Jin D, Zhang Z, Yuan D. Effect of dynamic cutterhead on face stability in EPB shield tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 110(1): 103827
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
WangHHuangMLvXZhouW. Upper-bound limit analysis of stability of shield tunnel face considering seepage. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(4): 1696−1704 (in Chinese)
|
[17] |
Tang X W, Liu W, Albers B, Savidis S. Upper bound analysis of tunnel face stability in layered soils. Acta Geotechnica, 2014, 9(4): 661–671
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Yang X L, Zhang R. Collapse analysis of shallow tunnel subjected to seepage in layered soils considering joined effects of settlement and dilation. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2017, 13(2): 217–235
|
[19] |
Zou J, Chen G, Qian Z. Tunnel face stability in cohesion-frictional soils considering the soil arching effect by improved failure models. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 106: 1–17
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Juneja A, Hegde A, Lee F H, Yeo C H. Centrifuge modelling of tunnel face reinforcement using forepoling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(4): 377–381
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Liu W, Zhao Y, Shi P, Li J, Gan P. Face stability analysis of shield-driven tunnels shallowly buried in dry sand using 1-g large-scale model tests. Acta Geotechnica, 2018, 13(3): 693–705
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Liu X Y, Fang H Y, Wang F M, Yuan D J. Horizontal trap-door investigation on face failure zone of shield tunneling in sands. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(3): 866–881
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Lei H, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Liu Y. Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(1): 147–166
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Paternesi A, Schweiger H F, Scarpelli G. Numerical analyses of stability and deformation behavior of reinforced and unreinforced tunnel faces. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 88: 256–266
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Zhang Z X, Hu X Y, Scott K D. A discrete numerical approach for modeling face stability in slurry shield tunnelling in soft soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(1): 94–104
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra A H. Rotational failure mechanisms for the face stability analysis of tunnels driven by a pressurized shield. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2011, 35(12): 1363–1388
|
[27] |
Perazzelli P, Leone T, Anagnostou G. Tunnel face stability under seepage flow conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 43: 459–469
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Pan Q, Dias D. The effect of pore water pressure on tunnel face stability. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2016, 40(15): 2123–2136
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Ji X, Ni P, Barla M, Zhao W, Mei G. Earth pressure on shield excavation face for pipe jacking considering arching effect. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 72: 17–27
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Kirsch A. Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43–62
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Chen R P, Li J, Kong L G, Tang L J. Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 33: 12–21
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Qarmout M, König D, Gussmann P, Thewes M, Schanz T. Tunnel face stability analysis using Kinematical Element Method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 85: 354–367
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
ZhuW BJuS J. Shield Tunneling Technology in Mixed Face Ground Conditions. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2006 (in Chinese)
|
[34] |
Wang H X. Type selection of the head aperture ratio of EPB shield cutter heads and adaptability to stratum characteristics. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(3): 88–92
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Min F, Zhu W, Lin C, Guo X. Opening the excavation chamber of the large-diameter size slurry shield: A case study in Nanjing Yangtze River Tunnel in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 46: 18–27
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
WangJHeCWangCChenZ QTangR. Face stability analysis of EPB shield tunnel in sand. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(1): 177−185 (in Chinese)
|
[37] |
Hu X, Cheng J, Ju J W. Influence of the cutterhead configuration and operation parameters on the face stability of EPB shield tunnels in dry granular soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2021, 21(5): 04021050
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
ZhuWQianYWangLHuJXingHLuK. Problems and measures of earth pressure balance shield during construction with the unfilled chamber. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(12): 224−234 (in Chinese)
|
[39] |
Zhang Z, Huang M, Zhang C, Jiang K, Bai Q. Analytical prediction of tunneling-induced ground movements and liner deformation in saturated soils considering influences of shield air pressure. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 78: 749–772
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Nagel F, Meschke G. An elasto-plastic three phase model for partially saturated soil for the finite element simulation of compressed air support in tunnelling. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2010, 34(6): 605–625
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Xu Q, Zhu H, Ding W, Ge X. Laboratory model tests and field investigations of EPB shield machine tunnelling in soft ground in Shanghai. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(1): 1–14
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Idinger G, Aklik P, Wu W, Borja R I. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel. Acta Geotechnica, 2011, 6(2): 105–117
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
QiangYZhaoMLinJChengLLiLHeZ. Research on coefficient of earth pressure at rest. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(3): 727−730 (in Chinese)
|
[44] |
ChenW F. Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1975
|
[45] |
Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra A H. Probabilistic analysis of circular tunnels in homogeneous soil using response surface methodology. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(9): 1314–1325
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Yu L, Zhang D, Fang Q, Cao L, Zhang Y, Xu T. Face stability of shallow tunnelling in sandy soil considering unsupported length. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 102: 103445
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Yang W, Zheng J, Zhang R, Qiao Y. Face stability analysis of shield tunnel considering variabilityof soil parameters and support pressure in clay. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 43(6): 27–37
|
[48] |
Min F, Zhu W, Han X. Filter cake formation for slurry shield tunneling in highly permeable sand. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 423–430
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Pani L, Stochino F. Punching of reinforced concrete slab without shear reinforcement: Standard models and new proposal. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 1196–1214
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Zhang H, Xing H. Mechanical characteristic and microstructure of salt-rich cement soil. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022, 81(3): 1–12
|
/
〈 | 〉 |