Real-time prediction of tunnel face conditions using XGBoost Random Forest algorithm

Abstract

Real-time perception of rock conditions based on continuously collected data to meet the requirements of continuous Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) construction presents a critical challenge that warrants increased attention. To achieve this goal, this paper establishes real-time prediction models for fractured and weak rock mass by comparing 6 different algorithms using real-time data collected by the TBM. The models are optimized in terms of selecting metric, selecting input features, and processing imbalanced data. The results demonstrate the following points. (1) The Youden’s index and area under the ROC curve (AUC) are the most appropriate performance metrics, and the XGBoost Random Forest (XGBRF) algorithm exhibits superior prediction and generalization performance. (2) The duration of the TBM loading phase is short, usually within a few minutes after the disc cutter contacts the tunnel face. A model based on the features during the loading phase has a miss rate of 21.8%, indicating that it can meet the early warning needs of TBM construction well. As the TBM continues to operate, the inclusion of features calculated from subsequent data collection can continuously correct the results of the real-time prediction model, ultimately reducing the miss rate to 16.1%. (3) Resampling the imbalanced data set can effectively improve the prediction by the model, while the XGBRF algorithm has certain advantages in dealing with the imbalanced data issue. When the model gives an alarm, the TBM operator and on-site engineer can be reminded and take some necessary measures for avoiding potential tunnel collapse. The real-time predication model can be a useful tool to increase the safety of TBM excavation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Tunnel Boring Machine / fractured and weak rock mass / machine learning model / real-time early warming / tunnel face rock condition

References

[1] Gong Q M, Yin L J, Ma H S, Zhao J. TBM tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: An overview. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 4–17

[2] Rostami J. Performance prediction of hard rock Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) in difficult ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 173–182

[3] Zheng Y L, Zhang Q B, Zhao J. Challenges and opportunities of using tunnel boring machines in mining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 287–299

[4] Yokota Y, Yamamoto T, Shirasagi S, Koizumi Y, Descour J, Kohlhaas M. Evaluation of geological conditions ahead of TBM tunnel using wireless seismic reflector tracing system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 85–90

[5] Li S C, Liu B, Xu X J, Nie L C, Liu Z Y, Song J, Sun H F, Chen L, Fan K R. An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 63: 69–94

[6] Li S C, Nie L C, Liu B. The practice of forward prospecting of adverse geology applied to hard rock tbm tunnel construction: The case of the Songhua river water conveyance project in the middle of Jilin province. Engineering, 2018, 4(1): 131–137

[7] Yang S L, Wang Z F, Wang J, Cohn A G, Zhang J Q, Jiang P, Nie L C, Sui Q M. Defect segmentation: Mapping tunnel lining internal defects with ground penetrating radar data using a convolutional neural network. Construction & Building Materials, 2022, 319: 125658

[8] Wang J S, Yang S L, Xu X J, Jiang P X, Ren Y X, Du C X, Du S L. 3C–3D tunnel seismic reverse time migration imaging: A case study of Pearl River Delta Water Resources Allocation Project. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2023, 210: 104954

[9] Li J B, Jing L J, Zheng X F, Li P Y, Yang C. Application and outlook of information and intelligence technology for safe and efficient TBM construction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 93: 103097

[10] Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Zhao J. A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(5): 595–603

[11] Farrokh E, Rostami J, Laughton C. Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 30: 110–123

[12] Rostami J. Study of pressure distribution within the crushed zone in the contact area between rock and disc cutters. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 57: 172–186

[13] Liu Q S, Pan Y C, Liu J P, Kong X X, Shi K. Comparison and discussion on fragmentation behavior of soft rock in multi-indentation tests by a single TBM disc cutter. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 151–161

[14] Ma H S, Gong Q M, Wang J, Yin L J, Zhao X B. Study on the influence of confining stress on TBM performance in granite rock by linear cutting test. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 145–150

[15] Smith J V. Assessing the ability of rock masses to support block breakage at the TBM cutter face. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 91–98

[16] Yin L J, Miao C T, He G W, Dai F C, Gong Q M. Study on the influence of joint spacing on rock fragmentation under TBM cutter by linear cutting test. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 137–144

[17] Pan Y C, Liu Q S, Liu J P, Huang X, Liu Q, Peng X X. Comparison between experimental and semi-theoretical disc cutter cutting forces: Implications for frame stiffness of the linear cutting machine. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11(11): 1–20

[18] Hamidi J K, Shahriar K, Rezai B, Rostami J. Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(4): 333–345

[19] Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Khamehchiyan M, Bruland A, Tavakoli H R. TBM performance analysis in pyroclastic rocks: A case history of Karaj Water conveyance tunnel. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2010, 43(4): 427–445

[20] Hassanpour J, Vanani A G, Rostami J, Cheshomi A. Evaluation of common TBM performance prediction models based on field data from the second lot of Zagros water conveyance tunnel (ZWCT2). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 52: 147–156

[21] Delisio A, Zhao J, Einstein H H. Analysis and prediction of TBM performance in blocky rock conditions at the Lötschberg Base Tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 33: 131–142

[22] Dudt J P, Delisio A. The “penalty factors” method for the prediction of TBM performances in changing grounds. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 195–200

[23] Pan Y C, Liu Q S, Liu Q, Bo Y, Liu J P, Peng X X, Cai T. Comparison and correlation between the laboratory, semi-theoretical and empirical methods in predicting the field excavation performance of tunnel boring machine (TBM). Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17(2): 653–676

[24] Yin X, Liu Q S, Huang X, Pan Y C. Perception model of surrounding rock geological conditions based on TBM operational big data and combined unsupervised-supervised learning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 120: 104285

[25] Zhang Q L, Zhu Y W, Ma R, Du C X, Du S L, Shao K, Li Q B. Prediction method of TBM tunneling parameters based on PSO-Bi-LSTM model. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10: 854807

[26] Qiu D H, Fu K, Xue Y G, Tao Y F, Kong F M, Bai C H. TBM tunnel surrounding rock classification method and real-time identification model based on tunneling performance. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 22(6): 04022070

[27] LiJ BChenZ YLiXJingL JZhangY PXiaoH HWangS JYangW KWuL JLiP YLiH BYaoMFanL T. Feedback on a shared big dataset for intelligent TBM Part I: Feature extraction and machine learning methods. Underground Space, 2023, 11: 1−25

[28] LiJ BChenZ YLiXJingL JZhangY PXiaoH HWangS JYangW KWuL JLiP YLiH BYaoMFanL T. Feedback on a shared big dataset for intelligent TBM Part II: Application and forward look. Underground Space, 2023, 11: 26−45

[29] Zhang Q L, Liu Z Y, Tan J R. Prediction of geological conditions for a tunnel boring machine using big operational data. Automation in Construction, 2019, 100: 73–83

[30] Zhu M Q, Gutierrez M, Zhu H H, Ju J W, Sarna S. Performance Evaluation Indicator (PEI): A new paradigm to evaluate the competence of machine learning classifiers in predicting rockmass conditions. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2021, 47: 101232

[31] HouS KLiuY RLiC YQinP X. Dynamic prediction of rock mass classification in the tunnel construction process based on random forest algorithm and TBM in situ operation parameters. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Beijing: IOP Publishing Ltd., 2020, 052056

[32] Hou S K, Liu Y R. Early warning of tunnel collapse based on Adam-optimised long short-term memory network and TBM operation parameters. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 112: 104842

[33] Li J H, Li P X, Guo D, Li X, Chen Z Y. Advanced prediction of tunnel boring machine performance based on Big Data. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(1): 331–338

[34] Liu B, Wang R, Zhao G, Guo X, Wang Y, Li J, Wang S. Prediction of rock mass parameters in the TBM tunnel based on BP neural network integrated simulated annealing algorithm. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 103103

[35] Feng S X, Chen Z Y, Luo H, Wang S Y, Zhao Y F, Liu L P, Ling D S, Jing L J. Tunnel boring machines (TBM) performance prediction: A case study using big data and deep learning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 110: 103636

[36] Gong Q M, Zhao J, Jiang Y S. In situ TBM penetration tests and rock mass boreability analysis in hard rock tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 22(3): 303–316

[37] Chen Z Y, Zhang Y P, Li J B, Li X, Jing L J. Diagnosing tunnel collapse sections based on TBM tunneling Big Data and deep learning: A case study on the YinSong Project, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 108: 103700

[38] Jing L J, Li J B, Yang C, Chen S, Zhang N, Peng X X. A case study of TBM performance prediction using field tunnelling tests in limestone strata. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 83: 364–372

[39] Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32

[40] ChenT QGuestrinC. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM, 2016, 785–794

[41] HeK MZhangX YRenS QSunJ. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016. Las Vegas, NV: IEEE, 2016, 770–778

[42] AkibaTSanoSYanaseTOhtaTKoyamaM. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM, 2019, 2623–2631

Acknowledgements

We sincerely give our thanks to the data support from the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (No. 2015CB058100), China Railway Engineering Equipment Group Corporation and the Survey and Design Institute of Water Conservancy of Jilin Province. This work was supported by the Natural Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFE0200400).

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn