Experimental study on the stratum applicability and mechanisms of bubble–slurry for earth pressure balance shields

Abstract

Soil conditioning is essential for addressing the stratum applicability problem of earth pressure balance (EPB) shields. Under high water pressures, EPB shields spew water and soil when excavating coarse-grained strata. Typically, foam combined with polymers and slurry is used to solve spewing. However, in current techniques, slurry, foam, and the other agents are mixed with soil separately, their synergistic effect is seldom realized. In this study, an anionic surfactant was used to foam in bentonite slurry to form bubble–slurry to maximize the synergy between bubbles and slurry. The slump, volume stability, and permeability test of bubble–slurry-conditioned sand was conducted to examine the conditioning effect, and the stratum applicability of bubble–slurry was determined from the perspective of permeability. It was found that the conditioning effect of bubble–slurry in coarse gravel soil was excellent and could expand the applicability of EPB shields. The main stabilization mechanism of bubble–slurry is that bentonite particles provide a space barrier for bubbles. And three seepage modes of bubble–slurry-conditioned sand were innovatively defined, and the occurrence conditions of the three seepage modes were analyzed according to the permeability coefficient of sand, initial dynamic shear force of bubble–slurry, and hydraulic gradient.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

EPB shield / bubble–slurry / soil conditioning / stability / permeability

References

[1] Lei H Y, Zhang Y J, Hu Y, Liu Y N. Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(1): 147–166

[2] Liao S M, Liu J H, Wang R L, Li Z M. Shield tunneling and environment protection in Shanghai soft ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4): 454–465

[3] Martinelli D, Peila D, Campa E. Feasibility study of tar sands conditioning for earth pressure balance tunnelling. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 7(6): 684–690

[4] Liu P F, Wang S Y, Ge L, Thewes M, Yang J S, Xia Y M. Changes of Atterberg limits and electrochemical behaviors of clays with dispersants as conditioning agents for EPB shield tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 73: 244–251

[5] Wang L, Zhu W, Qian Y J, Xu C, Hu J N, Xing H T. Phenomenon and critical conditions of chamber soil sliming during EPB shield tunneling in water-rich weathered diorite: Case study of Jinan Metro, China. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1–15

[6] Zheng G, Dai X, Diao Y. Parameter analysis of water flow during EPBS tunnelling and an evaluation method of spewing failure based on a simplified model. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2015, 58: 96–112

[7] Merritt A S, Mair R J. Mechanics of tunnelling machine screw conveyors: Model tests. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(9): 605–615

[8] Peila D. Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(3): 831–836

[9] Baghali H, Chakeri H, Sharghi M, Dias D. Effect of soil moisture and granulometry on soil conditioning for EPB-TBM tunneling: Case study. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2021, 49(1): 355–371

[10] Peila D, Oggeri C, Borio L. Using the slump test to assess the behavior of conditioned soil for EPB tunneling. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 2009, 15(3): 167–174

[11] Vinai R, Oggeri C, Peila D. Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: A laboratory research. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(3): 308–317

[12] Budach C, Thewes M. Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 296–304

[13] Galli M, Thewes M. Rheological characterisation of foam-conditioned sands in EPB tunneling. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 17(1): 145–160

[14] Langmaack L, Lee K F. Difficult ground conditions? Use the right chemicals! Chances-limits-requirements.. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 112–121

[15] Quebaud S, Sibai M, Henry J P. Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1998, 13(2): 173–180

[16] Tao L M, Chen Z T, Cui J, Wang H W, Fang Y. Experimental methods to assess the effectiveness of soil conditioning with foam in fully weathered granite. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 2019: 1–12

[17] Wan Z E, Li S C, Yuan C, Zhao S S, Wang M L, Lu Q L, Hou W. Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in silty clay and weathered mudstone. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2021, 21(9): 06021020

[18] Wu Y L, Mooney M A, Cha M S. An experimental examination of foam stability under pressure for EPB TBM tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 77: 80–93

[19] Hu Q X, Wang S Y, Qu T M, Xu T, Huang S, Wang H B. Effect of hydraulic gradient on the permeability characteristics of foam-conditioned sand for mechanized tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 99: 103377

[20] Carigi A, Luciani A, Todaro C, Martinelli D, Peila D. Influence of conditioning on the behaviour of alluvial soils with cobbles. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96: 103225

[21] Selmi M, Kacem M, Jamei M, Dubujet P. Physical foam stability of loose sandy-clay: A porosity role in the conditioned soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2020, 231(5): 251

[22] Huang Z Q, Wang C, Dong J Y, Zhou J J, Yang J H, Li Y W. Conditioning experiment on sand and cobble soil for shield tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 87: 187–194

[23] Xu Q W, Zhang L Y, Zhu H H, Gong Z Y, Liu J G, Zhu Y H. Laboratory tests on conditioning the sandy cobble soil for EPB shield tunnelling and its field application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103512

[24] Ling F, Wang S, Hu Q, Huang S, Feng Z. Effect of bentonite slurry on the function of foam for changing the permeability characteristics of sand under high hydraulic gradients. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2022, 59(7): 1061–1070

[25] Borio L, Peila D. Study of the permeability of foam conditioned soils with laboratory tests. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 6(4): 365–370

[26] Kim T H, Kim B K, Lee K H, Lee I M. Soil conditioning of weathered granite soil used for EPB shield TBM: A laboratory scale study. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(4): 1829–1838

[27] Wang S, Huang S, Zhong J, Zhang S, Hu Q, Qu T, Ye X. Permeability stability calculation model of foam-conditioned soil based on the permeability constant. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2021, 45(4): 540–559

[28] Katagiri J, Kimura S, Noda S. Significance of shape factor on permeability anisotropy of sand: Representative elementary volume study for pore-scale analysis. Acta Geotechnica, 2020, 15(8): 2195–2203

[29] Uma K O, Loehnert E P. Hydraulic conductivity of shallow sandy aquifers: Effects of sedimentologic and diagenetic differences. Environmental Geology, 1994, 23(3): 171–181

[30] YuLHanZHeJLiG. Experimental study on the permeability damage mechanism of gravel pack sand control medium in mud hydrate reservoirs. Journal of Coastal Research, 2022, 38(6): 1104−1115

[31] Jauregi P, Gilmour S, Varley J. Characterisation of colloidal gas aphrons for subsequent use for protein recovery. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1997, 65(1): 1–11

[32] Molaei A, Waters K E. Aphron applications—A review of recent and current research. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2015, 216: 36–54

[33] Sun Q, Li Z M, Wang J Q, Li S Y, Li B F, Jiang L, Wang H Y, Lu Q C, Zhang C, Liu W. Aqueous foam stabilized by partially hydrophobic nanoparticles in the presence of surfactant. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015, 471: 54–64

[34] EFNARC. Specifications and Guidelines for the Use of Specialist Products for Mechanized Tunnelling (TBM) in Soft Ground and Hard Rock. Surrey: EFNARC, 2005

[35] Min F L, Song H B, Zhang N. Experimental study on fluid properties of slurry and its influence on slurry infiltration in sand stratum. Applied Clay Science, 2018, 161: 64–69

[36] ASTMC143/C143M-20. Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2020

[37] ASTM D2434-22. Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Coarse-Grained Soils. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2022

[38] Zhao G, Dai C L, Wen D L, Fang J C. Stability mechanism of a novel three-phase foam by adding dispersed particle gel. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 497: 214–224

[39] Zhong X, Liu D X, Shi X F, Zhao H T, Pei C, Zhu T Y, Shao M L, Zhang F. Characteristics and functional mechanisms of clay-cement stabilized three-phase nitrogen foam for heavy oil reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2018, 170: 497–506

[40] Wang H, Wang S, Zhong J, Qu T, Liu Z, Xu T, Liu P. Undrained compressibility characteristics and pore pressure calculation model of foam-conditioned sand. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 118: 104161

[41] ZhongJWangSQuT. Undrained vane shear strength of sand-foam mixtures subjected to different shear rates. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 15(6): 1591−1602

[42] Zhang S Q, Pei H F. Determining the bound water content of montmorillonite from molecular simulations. Engineering Geology, 2021, 294: 106353

[43] Carn F, Colin A, Pitois O, Vignes-Adler M, Backov R. Foam drainage in the presence of nanoparticle-surfactant mixtures. Langmuir, 2009, 25(14): 7847–7856

[44] Jin H J, Zhou W Z, Cao J, Stoyanov S D, Blijdenstein T, de Groot P, Arnaudov L N, Pelan E G. Super stable foams stabilized by colloidal ethyl cellulose particles. Soft Matter, 2012, 8(7): 2194–2205

[45] Wang T F, Fan H M, Yang W P, Meng Z. Stabilization mechanism of fly ash three-phase foam and its sealing capacity on fractured reservoirs. Fuel, 2020, 264: 116832

[46] Zhao J, Torabi F, Yang J. The synergistic role of silica nanoparticle and anionic surfactant on the static and dynamic CO₂ foam stability for enhanced heavy oil recovery: An experimental study. Fuel, 2021, 287: 119443

[47] BinksB P. Particles as surfactants—Similarities and differences. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2002, 7(1−2): 21−41

[48] Garbin V, Crocker J C, Stebe K J. Nanoparticles at fluid interfaces: Exploiting capping ligands to control adsorption, stability and dynamics. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 387(1): 1–11

[49] Tzoumaki M V, Karefyllakis D, Moschakis T, Biliaderis C G, Scholten E. Aqueous foams stabilized by chitin nanocrystals. Soft Matter, 2015, 11(31): 6245–6253

[50] Yekeen N, Manan M A, Idris A K, Padmanabhan E, Junin R, Samin A M, Gbadamosi A O, Oguamah I. A comprehensive review of experimental studies of nanoparticles-stabilized foam for enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2018, 164: 43–74

[51] Zhu W X, Zheng X H, Li G M. Micro-bubbles size, rheological and filtration characteristics of Colloidal Gas Aphron (CGA) drilling fluids for high temperature well: Role of attapulgite. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2020, 186: 106683

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC3202705), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B200203081), and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX20_0436).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press