Experimental and numerical evaluation of multi-directional compressive and flexure behavior of three-dimensional printed concrete
Lalit KUMAR, Dhrutiman DEY, Biranchi PANDA, Nelson MUTHU
Experimental and numerical evaluation of multi-directional compressive and flexure behavior of three-dimensional printed concrete
Three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) can proliferate the industrialization of the construction sector, which is notoriously conservative and indolent toward changes. However, the mechanical behavior of 3DCP should be characterized and modeled considering the interfaces when its performance is thoroughly compared to that of the existing concrete construction methods. This study presents an experimental and numerical investigation of uniaxial compression and three-point bending (TPB) tests on extruded 3DCP beams in different loading directions. The orientation of translational and depositional interfaces with respect to the direction of loading influenced the strength. Both the elastic and post-damage behavior of the 3DCP specimens were compared with those of the conventionally cast specimen under quasi-static loading conditions. Despite the higher compressive strength of the casted specimen, the flexural strength of the 3DCP specimens was higher. This study employed the finite element and cohesive zone models of the appropriate calibrated traction-separation law to model fracture in the notched TPB specimens. Furthermore, the real-time acoustic emission test revealed the nature of failure phenomenon of three-dimensional-printed specimens under flexion, and accordingly, the cohesive law was chosen. The predicted load−displacement responses are in good agreement with the experimental results. Finally, the effects of cohesive thickness and notch shape on the performance under bending were explored through parametric studies.
three-dimensional printing / anisotropy / flexure / compression / cohesive zone model / finite element model
[1] |
Labonnote N, Rønnquist A, Manum B, Rüther P. Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Automation in Construction, 2016, 72: 347–366
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Buswell R A, Leal de Silva W R, Jones S Z, Dirrenberger J. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 112: 37–49
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Menna C, Mata-Falcón J, Bos F P, Vantyghem G, Ferrara L, Asprone D, Salet T, Kaufmann W. Opportunities and challenges for structural engineering of digitally fabricated concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 133: 106079
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 2016, 68: 21–31
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, Salet T. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: Potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2016, 11(3): 209–225
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
de Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V, Nerella V N, Habert G, Agusti-Juan I. Vision of 3D printing with concrete—Technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 112: 25–36
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Feng P, Meng X, Chen J F, Ye L. Mechanical properties of structures 3D printed with cementitious powders. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 93: 486–497
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Ma G, Li Z, Wang L, Wang F, Sanjayan J. Mechanical anisotropy of aligned fiber reinforced composite for extrusion-based 3D printing. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 202: 770–783
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Panda B, Paul S C, Mohamed N A N, Tay Y W D, Tan M J. Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar. Measurement, 2018, 113: 108–116
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Meurer M, Classen M. Mechanical properties of hardened 3D printed concretes and mortars-development of a consistent experimental characterization strategy. Materials, 2021, 14(4): 1–23
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Liu J, Li S, Fox K, Tran P. 3D concrete printing of bioinspired Bouligand structure: A study on impact resistance. Additive Manufacturing, 2022, 50: 102544
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Le T T, Austin S A, Lim S, Buswell R A, Law R, Gibb A G F, Thorpe T. Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(3): 558–566
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Panda B, Chandra Paul S, Jen Tan M. Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Materials Letters, 2017, 209: 146–149
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Nerella V N, Hempel S, Mechtcherine V. Effects of layer-interface properties on mechanical performance of concrete elements produced by extrusion-based 3D-printing. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 205: 586–601
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Xiao J, Liu H, Ding T. Finite element analysis on the anisotropic behavior of 3D printed concrete under compression and flexure. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 39: 101712
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Paul S C, Tay Y W D, Panda B N, Tan M J. Fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable cementitious materials for building and construction. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 311–319
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Panda B, Paul S C, Hui L J, Tay Y W D, Tan M J. Additive manufacturing of geopolymer for sustainable built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 281–288
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Wolfs R J M, Bos F P, Salet T A M. Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: The influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 119: 132–140
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Lourenço P B, Rots J G, Blaauwendraad J. Continuum model for masonry: Parameter estimation and validation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 124(6): 642–652
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Mobasher B. M&S Highlight: Hillerborg (1985). The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energy GF of concrete. Materials and Structures, 2022, 55(2): 56–57
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Nguyen-Van V, Li S, Liu J, Nguyen K, Tran P. Modeling of 3D concrete printing process: A perspective on material and structural simulations. Additive Manufacturing, 2023, 61: 103333
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Jasim W A, Tahnat Y B A, Halahla A M. Behavior of reinforced concrete deep beam with web openings strengthened with (CFRP) sheet. Structures, 2020, 26: 785–800
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
van den Heever M, Bester F, Kruger J, van Zijl G. Mechanical characterisation for numerical simulation of extrusion-based 3D concrete printing. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44: 102944
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Yang J, Xia J, Zhang Z, Zou Y, Wang Z, Zhou J. Experimental and numerical investigations on the mechanical behavior of reinforced concrete arches strengthened with UHPC subjected to asymmetric load. Structures, 2022, 39: 1158–1175
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Peng Q, Wu H, Jia P C, Ma L L, Fang Q. Numerical studies on rebar-concrete interactions of RC members under impact and explosion. Structures, 2023, 47: 63–80
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Liu H, Egbe K J I, Wang H, Matin Nazar A, Jiao P, Zhu R. A numerical study on 3D printed cementitious composites mixes subjected to axial compression. Materials, 2021, 14(22): 6882
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Bedon C, Rajcic V, Barbalic J, Perkovic N. CZM-based FE numerical study on pull-out performance of adhesive bonded-in-rod (BiR) joints for timber structures. Structures, 2022, 46: 471–491
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Anas S M, Alam M, Umair M. Experimental and numerical investigations on performance of reinforced concrete slabs under explosive-induced air-blast loading: A state-of-the-art review. Structures, 2021, 31: 428–461
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Nguyen-Van V, Liu J, Li S, Zhang G, Nguyen-Xuan H, Tran P. Modeling of 3D-printed bio-inspired Bouligand cementitious structures reinforced with steel fibers. Engineering Structures, 2023, 274: 115123
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Nguyen-Van V, Liu J, Peng C, Zhang G, Nguyen-Xuan H, Tran P. Dynamic responses of bioinspired plastic-reinforced cementitious beams. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 133: 104682
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
ASTMC109. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 50mm Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2010
|
[32] |
ASTMC880. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Dimension Stone. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 1999, 98–100
|
[33] |
MahmoudK S. Design of concrete Structures According to ACI 318M-14 Third Stage, 2016
|
[34] |
Gonçalves R, Giacon Júnior M, Lopes I M. Determining the concrete stiffness matrix through ultrasonic testing. Engenharia Agrícola, 2011, 31(3): 427–437
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
MISTRASGroup Inc.—Products & Systems Division. USB-AE Node & AEwin for USB Software User’s Manual. Princeton Junction: MISTRAS Group Inc., 2010
|
[36] |
Sanjayan J G, Nematollahi B, Xia M, Marchment T. Effect of surface moisture on inter-layer strength of 3D printed concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 172: 468–475
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Yang L, Liu G, Chen Y, Yu S, Du H. Hardened properties and durability of large-scale 3D printed cement-based materials. Materials and Structures, 2021, 54(1): 45
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Bachir Bouiadjra B, Achour T, Berrahou M, Ouinas D, Feaugas X. Numerical estimation of the mass gain between double symmetric and single bonded composite repairs in aircraft structures. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(6): 3073–3077
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Odi R A, Friend C M. An improved 2D model for bonded composite joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2004, 24(5): 389–405
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Feih S, Shercliff H R. Adhesive and composite failure prediction of single-L joint structures under tensile loading. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2005, 25(1): 47–59
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Magalhães A G, de Moura M F S F, Gonçalves J P M. Evaluation of stress concentration effects in single-lap bonded joints of laminate composite materials. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2005, 25(4): 313–319
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Jin Z H, Sun C T. A comparison of cohesive zone modeling and classical fracture mechanics based on near tip stress field. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(5): 1047–1060
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Schellekens J C J, de Borst R. A non-linear finite element approach for the analysis of mode-I free edge delamination in composites. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1993, 30(9): 1239–1253
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
de Moura M F S F, Gonçalves J P M, Magalhães A G. A straightforward method to obtain the cohesive laws of bonded joints under mode I loading. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2012, 39: 54–59
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
deMoura M F S FCampilhoR D S GGonçalvesJ P M. Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading. Composites Science and Technology, 2008, 68(10−11): 2224−2230
|
/
〈 | 〉 |