Printability and hardening performance of three-dimensionally-printed geopolymer based on lunar regolith simulant for automated construction of lunar infrastructure
Feng LI, Rongrong ZHANG, Siqi ZHOU, Xingyi ZHU
Printability and hardening performance of three-dimensionally-printed geopolymer based on lunar regolith simulant for automated construction of lunar infrastructure
Using an in situ lunar regolith as a construction material in combination with 3D printing not only reduces the weight of materials carried from the Earth but also improves the automation of lunar infrastructure construction. This study aims to improve the printability of a geopolymer based on a BH-1 lunar regolith simulant, including the extrudability, open time, and buildability, by controlling the temperature and adding admixtures. Rheological parameters were used to represent printability with different water-to-binder ratios, printing temperatures, and contents of additives. The mechanical properties of the hardening geopolymer with different filling paths and loading directions were tested. The results show that heating the printed filaments with a water-to-binder ratio of 0.32 at 80 °C can adjust the printability without adding any additive, which can reduce the construction cost of lunar infrastructure. The printability of the BH-1 geopolymer can also be improved by adding 0.3% Attagel-50 and 0.5% polypropylene fiber by mass at a temperature of 20 °C to cope with the changeable environmental conditions on the Moon. After curing under a simulated lunar environment, the 72-h flexural and compressive strengths of the geopolymer specimens reach 4.1 and 48.1 MPa, respectively, which are promising considering that the acceleration of gravity on the Moon is 1/6 of that on the Earth.
geopolymer / lunar regolith simulant / 3D printing / rheology / printability
[1] |
Wang C, Nie H, Chen J, Lee H P. The design and dynamic analysis of a lunar lander with semi-active control. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 157: 145–156
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
RappD. Use of Extraterrestrial Resources for Human Space Missions to Moon or Mars. New York: Springer, 2018, 125–146
|
[3] |
Qiu Y, Park K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2012, 64: 49–60
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Taylor S L, Jakus A E, Koube K D, Ibeh A J, Geisendorfer N R, Shah R N, Dunand D C. Sintering of micro-trusses created by extrusion-3D-printing of lunar regolith inks. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 143: 1–8
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Toutanji H A, Evans S, Grugel R N. Performance of lunar sulfur concrete in lunar environments. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 29: 444–448
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Davis G, Montes C, Eklund S. Preparation of lunar regolith based geopolymer cement under heat and vacuum. Advances in Space Research, 2017, 59(7): 1872–1885
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Davidovits J. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1991, 37(8): 1633–1656
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Xu F, Gu G, Zhang W, Wang H, Huang X, Zhu J. Pore structure analysis and properties evaluations of fly ash-based geopolymer foams by chemical foaming method. Ceramics International, 2018, 44(16): 19989–19997
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
HeikenGVanimanDFrenchB M. Lunar Sourcebook—A User’s Guide to the Moon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, 753
|
[10] |
Montes C, Broussard K, Gongre M, Simicevic N, Mejia J, Tham J, Allouche E, Davis G. Evaluation of lunar regolith geopolymer binder as a radioactive shielding material for space exploration applications. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 56(6): 1212–1221
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Alexiadis A, Alberini F, Meyer M E. Geopolymers from lunar and Martian soil simulants. Advances in Space Research, 2017, 59(1): 490–495
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Zhang C, Nerella V N, Krishna A, Wang S, Zhang Y, Mechtcherine V, Banthia N. Mix design concepts for 3D printable concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 122: 104155
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Pilehvar S, Arnhof M, Pamies R, Valentini L, Kjøniksen A L. Utilization of urea as an accessible superplasticizer on the moon for lunar geopolymer mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 247: 119177
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Cesaretti G, Dini E, de Kestelier X, Colla V, Pambaguian L. Building components for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 93: 430–450
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Chu S H, Li L G, Kwan A K H. Development of extrudable high strength fiber reinforced concrete incorporating nano calcium carbonate. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 37: 101617
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Panda B, Tan M J. Rheological behavior of high volume fly ash mixtures containing micro silica for digital construction application. Materials Letters, 2019, 237: 348–351
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Liu C, Wang X, Chen Y, Zhang C, Ma L, Deng Z, Chen C, Zhang Y, Pan J, Banthia N. Influence of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and silica fume on stability, rheological properties, and printability of 3D printing foam concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 122: 104158
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Labonnote N, Rønnquist A, Manum B, Rüther P. Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Automation in Construction, 2016, 72(3): 347–366
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Guo X, Yang J, Xiong G. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on rheological properties of 3D printed fly ash based geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 114: 103820
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Panda B, Ruan S, Unluer C, Tan M J. Improving the 3D printability of high volume fly ash mixtures via the use of nano attapulgite clay. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2019, 165: 75–83
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Zhang Y, Zhang Y, She W, Yang L, Liu G, Yang Y. Rheological and harden properties of the high-thixotropy 3D printing concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 201: 278–285
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Liu X, Li Q, Li J. Shrinkage and mechanical properties optimization of spray-based 3D printed concrete by PVA fiber. Materials Letters, 2022, 319: 132253
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Hambach M, Volkmer D. Properties of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced Portland cement paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 79: 62–70
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Raza M H, Zhong R Y, Khan M. Recent advances and productivity analysis of 3D printed geopolymers. Additive Manufacturing, 2022, 52: 102685
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Zhou S, Zhu X, Lu C, Li F. Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer from lunar regolith simulant based on natural volcanic scoria. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(1): 144–159
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Zhou S, Lu C, Zhu X, Li F. Preparation and characterization of high-strength geopolymer based on BH-1 lunar soil simulant with low alkali content. Engineering, 2021, 7(11): 1631–1645
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
McKayDCarterJBolesWAllenCAlltonJ. JSC-1: A new lunar regolith simulant. In: Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Space IV. Albuquerque, NM: American Society of Civil Engineer, 1994, 857–866
|
[28] |
Zheng Y, Wang S, Ouyang Z, Zou Y, Liu J, Li C, Li X, Feng J. CAS-1 lunar soil simulant. Advances in Space Research, 2009, 43(3): 448–454
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Robens E, Dbrowski A, Mendyk E, Goworek J, Sobczak J. Investigation of surface properties of lunar regolith—Part IV, annales UMCS. Chemistry, 2008, 63: 144–168
|
[30] |
Ma G, Li Z, Wang L. Printable properties of cementitious material containing copper tailings for extrusion based 3D printing. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 162: 613–627
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Kuenzel C, Gundlach C, Pedersen D B, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Spangenberg J. Rheological characterization of 3D printable geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 147: 106498
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Ivaniuk E, Friedrich Eichenauer M, Tošić Z, Müller S, Lordick D, Mechtcherine V. 3D printing and assembling of frame modules using printable strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC). Materials & Design, 2022, 219: 110757
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
ASTMD2196-20. Standard Test Methods for Rheological Properties of Non-Newtonian Materials by Rotational Viscometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2020
|
[34] |
Sun C, Xiang J, Xu M, He Y, Tong Z, Cui X. 3D extrusion free forming of geopolymer composites: Materials modification and processing optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 258: 120986
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Zhou S, Yang Z, Zhang R, Zhu X, Li F. Preparation and evaluation of geopolymer based on BH-2 lunar regolith simulant under lunar surface temperature and vacuum condition. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 189: 90–98
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
GB/T17671-2021. Test Method of Cement Mortar Strength (ISO method). Beijing: Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China, 2021 (in Chinese)
|
[37] |
Ma G, Li Z, Wang L, Wang F, Sanjayan J. Mechanical anisotropy of aligned fiber reinforced composite for extrusion-based 3D printing. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 202: 770–783
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Ye J, Cui C, Yu J, Yu K, Xiao J. Fresh and anisotropic-mechanical properties of 3D printable ultra-high ductile concrete with crumb rubber. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2021, 211: 108639
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Petrie C J S. The rheology of fibre suspensions. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 87(2): 369–402
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Chen M, Liu B, Li L, Cao L, Huang Y, Wang S, Zhao P, Lu L, Cheng X. Rheological parameters, thixotropy and creep of 3D-printed calcium sulfoaluminate cement composites modified by bentonite. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2020, 186: 107821
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Chen M, Li L, Wang J, Huang Y, Wang S, Zhao P, Lu L, Cheng X. Rheological parameters and building time of 3D printing sulphoaluminate cement paste modified by retarder and diatomite. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 234: 117391
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Long W J, Lin C, Tao J L, Ye T H, Fang Y. Printability and particle packing of 3D-printable limestone calcined clay cement composites. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 282: 122647
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Ye J, Cui C, Yu J, Yu K, Dong F. Effect of polyethylene fiber content on workability and mechanical-anisotropic properties of 3D printed ultra-high ductile concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 281: 122586
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |