Do civil engineering fronts emerge from interdisciplinary research?

Jie HE, Junlan YAO, Xin CHEN, Fang LIU, Hehua ZHU

PDF(6778 KB)
PDF(6778 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1) : 1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-022-0929-7
PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE

Do civil engineering fronts emerge from interdisciplinary research?

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is considered a source of innovativeness and creativity, serving as a key mechanism for creating recombination necessary for the evolution of science systems. The aim of this study is to quantitatively establish the connection between interdisciplinary research and the research fronts that have recently emerged in civil engineering. The degree of interdisciplinarity of the research fronts was measured by developing metrics from bibliographic analyses. As indicated by the consistent increase in the metrics of interdisciplinarity over time, research fronts tend to emerge in studies with increasing diversity in the disciplines involved. The active disciplines involved in the fronts vary over time. The most active disciplines are no longer fundamental but those associated with energy, environment, and sustainable development, focusing on solutions to climate change and integrating intelligence technologies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

interdisciplinary research / research front / bibliographic analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jie HE, Junlan YAO, Xin CHEN, Fang LIU, Hehua ZHU. Do civil engineering fronts emerge from interdisciplinary research?. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 1‒9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0929-7

References

[1]
KleinJ T. The Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. California: Thousand Oaks, 2008
[2]
Upham S P, Small H. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 15–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Wagner C S, Roessner J D, Bobb K, Klein J T, Boyack K W, Keyton J, Rafols I, Börner K. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 14–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Lakhani J, Benzies K, Hayden K A. Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: A comprehensive review of the literature. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 2010, 35(5): 260–265
[5]
Szostak R. The state of the field: Interdisciplinary research. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 2013, 31: 44–65
[6]
Vajaradul Y, Aroonsrimorakot S, Laiphrakpam M, Paisantanakij W. Key steps and characteristics for successful interdisciplinary research: An analytical review. Journal of Behavioral Science, 2021, 16(2): 73–85
[7]
Morss R E, Lazrus H, Demuth J L. The “inter” within interdisciplinary research: Strategies for building integration across fields. Risk Analysis, 2021, 41(7): 1152–1161
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Taylor P C, Abeysekera M, Bian Y, Cetenovic D, Deakin M, Ehsan A, Levi V, Li F, Oduro R, Preece R, Taylor P G, Terzija V, Walker S L, Wu J. An interdisciplinary research perspective on the future of multi-vector energy networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022, 135: 107492
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
ProjectGroup of Global Engineering Fronts of Chinese Academy of Engineering. Engineering Fronts 2021. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2021
[10]
Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707–719
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
LeydesdorffL. Diversity and interdisciplinarity: How can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance? Scientometrics, 2018, 116(3): 2113–2121
[12]
Molas-Gallart J S A. Diversity and excellence: Considerations on research policy. IPTS Report, 2002, 66(5): 5–13
[13]
Rafols I, Leydesdorff L, O’Hare A, Nightingale P, Stirling A. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management. Research Policy, 2012, 41(7): 1262–1282
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Xing M, Qu K S, Huang Y, Xing Y R. A reflection on the 2017 nobel prize for physiology and chinese medicine. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2020, 26(11): 867–872
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Dutta B, Sarkar S, Majhi K, Bandopadhyay R. Interdisciplinary research of physics in biological field leads the nobel prize 2018. National Academy Science Letters, 2021, 44(2): 181–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Yegros-Yegros A, Rafols I, D’Este P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity.. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0135095
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Kwon S. Interdisciplinary knowledge integration as a unique knowledge source for technology development and the role of funding allocation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 181: 121767
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Abramo G, D’Angelo C A, Zhang L. A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(4): 1182–1193
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Porter A L, Roessner J D, Cohen A S, Perreault M. Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 2006, 15(3): 187–196
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Rafols I, Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 263–287
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Carley S, Porter A L, Rafols I, Leydesdorff L. Visualization of disciplinary profiles: Enhanced science overlay maps. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 2(3): 68–111
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the project “Global Engineering Fronts,” funded by the Chinese Academy of Engineering.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6778 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/