Structural optimization of filament wound composite pipes

Roham RAFIEE, Reza SHAHZADI, Hossein SPERESP

PDF(2742 KB)
PDF(2742 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 1056-1069. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-022-0868-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Structural optimization of filament wound composite pipes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

An optimization procedure is developed for obtaining optimal structural design of filament wound composite pipes with minimum cost utilized in pressurized water and waste-water pipelines. First, the short-term and long-term design constraints dictated by international standards are identified. Then, proper computational tools are developed for predicting the structural properties of the composite pipes based on the design architecture of layers. The developed computational tools are validated by relying on experimental analysis. Then, an integrated design-optimization process is developed to minimize the price as the main objective, taking into account design requirements and manufacturing limitations as the constraints and treating lay-up sequence, fiber volume fraction, winding angle, and the number of total layers as design variables. The developed method is implemented in various case studies, and the results are presented and discussed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

composite pipes / optimization / experimental validation / computational modeling / filament winding

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Roham RAFIEE, Reza SHAHZADI, Hossein SPERESP. Structural optimization of filament wound composite pipes. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(8): 1056‒1069 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0868-3

References

[1]
Nikbakt S, Kamarian S, Shakeri M. A review on optimization of composite structures Part I: Laminated composites. Composite Structures, 2018, 195: 158–185
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Pan G, Lu J, Shen K, Ke J. Optimization of composite cylindrical shell subjected to hydrostatic pressure. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications. Cham: Springer, 2015, 81–90
[3]
Smerdov A A. A computational study in optimum formulations of optimization problems on laminated cylindrical shells for buckling I. Shells under axial compression. Composites Science and Technology, 2000, 60(11): 2057–2066
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Diaconu C G, Sato M, Sekine H. Buckling characteristics and layup optimization of long laminated composite cylindrical shells subjected to combined loads using lamination parameters. Composite Structures, 2002, 58(4): 423–433
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Foldager J P, Hansen J S, Olhoff N. Optimization of the buckling load for composite structures taking thermal effects into account. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(1): 14–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Irisarri F X, Abdalla M M, Gürdal Z. Improved Shepard’s method for the optimization of composite structures. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(12): 2726–2736
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Abouhamze M, Shakeri M. Multi-objective stacking sequence optimization of laminated cylindrical panels using a genetic algorithm and neural networks. Composite Structures, 2007, 81(2): 253–263
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Kriegesmann B, Rolfes R, Jansen E L, Elishakoff I, Hühne C, Kling A. Design optimization of composite cylindrical shells under uncertainty. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2012, 32(3): 177–200
[9]
Rouhi M, Ghayoor H, Hoa S V, Hojjati M. Computational efficiency and accuracy of multi-step design optimization method for variable stiffness composite structures. Thin-walled Structures, 2017, 113: 136–143
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Topal U. Multiobjective optimization of laminated composite cylindrical shells for maximum frequency and buckling load. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(7): 2584–2594
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Wang Z, Almeida J H S Jr, St-Pierre L, Wang Z, Castro S G P. Reliability-based buckling optimization with an accelerated Kriging metamodel for filament-wound variable angle tow composite cylinders. Composite Structures, 2020, 254: 112821
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
M. Salim, M. Bodaghi, S. Kamarian, M. Shakeri. Free vibration analysis and design optimization of SMA/Graphite/Epoxy composite shells in thermal environments. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 15(1): 1–16
[13]
Adali S, Walker M, Verijenko V E. Multiobjective optimization of laminated plates for maximum prebuckling, buckling and postbucklikng strength using continuous and discrerte ply angles. Composite Structures, 1996, 35(1): 117–130
[14]
Ameri E, Aghdam M M, Shakeri M. Global optimization of laminated cylindrical panels based on fundamental natural frequencies. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(9): 2697–2705
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
OhtaY. Genetic algorithms for optimization of laminated composite cylindrical shells. In: 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Long Beach, CA: AIAA, 4939
[16]
Ohta Y. Optimal stacking sequence for nonlinear vibration of laminated composite circular cylindrical shells. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 18th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference. Orlando, FL: AIAA, 2010, 2882
[17]
Yas M H, Shakeri M, Khaksar N. Stacking sequence optimization of a composite cylindrical shell for vibrations by hybrid continuous optimization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2008, 222(12): 2385–2394
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Luersen M A, Steeves C A, Nair P B. Curved fiber paths optimization of a composite cylindrical shell via Kriging-based approach. Journal of Composite Materials, 2015, 49(29): 3583–3597
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Shakeri M, Yas M H, Gol M G. Optimal stacking sequence of laminated cylindrical shells using genetic algorithm. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2005, 12(4): 305–312
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
CorreiaI PMartinsP GSoaresC MSoaresC MHerskovitsJ. Modelling and optimization of laminated adaptive shells of revolution. Composite Structures, 2006, 75(1−4): 49−59
[21]
Minsch N, Herrmann F H, Gereke T, Nocke A, Cherif C. Analysis of filament winding processes and potential equipment technologies. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 66: 125–130
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Colombo C, Vergani L. Optimization of filament winding parameters for the design of a composite pipe. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2018, 148: 207–216
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Jin N J, Hwang H G, Yeon J H. Structural analysis and optimum design of GRP pipes based on properties of materials. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 38: 316–326
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Almeida J H S Jr, Ribeiro M L, Tita V, Amico S C. Stacking sequence optimization in composite tubes under internal pressure based on genetic algorithm accounting for progressive damage. Composite Structures, 2017, 178: 20–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Liu C, Shi Y. Design optimization for filament wound cylindrical composite internal pressure vessels considering process-induced residual stresses. Composite Structures, 2020, 235: 111755
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Zhang Z, Hou S, Liu Q, Han X. Winding orientation optimization design of composite tubes based on quasistatic and dynamic experiments. Thin-walled Structures, 2018, 127: 425–433
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Alcántar V, Ledesma S, Aceves S M, Ledesma E, Saldana A. Optimization of type III pressure vessels using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(31): 20125–20132
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
ANSI/AWWAC950-01. Standard for Fiberglass Pressure Pipe. Denver: American Water Works Association, 2001
[29]
GibsonR F. Principles of Composite Material Mechanics. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007
[30]
RoylanceD K. Netting Analysis for Filament-wound Pressure Vessels. Watertown, MA: Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, 1976
[31]
ASTMD2105-01. Standard Test Method for Longitudinal Tensile Properties of Fiberglass (glass Fiber Reinforced Thermosetting Resin) Pipe and Tube. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2001
[32]
ASTMD2290-00. Standard Test Method for Apparent Hoop Tensile Strength of Plastic or Reinforced Plastic Pipe by Split Disc Method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000
[33]
ASTMD1599-99. Standard Test Method for Resistance to Short-time Hydraulic Pressure of Plastic Pipes, Tubing, and Fittings. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 1999
[34]
ASTMD2412-02. Standard Test Method for Determination of External Loading Characteristics of Plastic Pipe by Parallel-plate Loading. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2002
[35]
ASTMD3171-15. Standard Test Method for Constituent Content of Composite Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2015
[36]
ASTMD2992-06. Standard Practice for Obtaining Hydrostatic or Pressure Design Basis for Fiberglass Pipe and Fitting. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2006
[37]
ISO10468. Glass-reinforced Thermosetting Plastics (GRP) Pipes—Determination of the Ring Creep Properties Under Wet or Dry Condition. Genewa: ISO, 2018
[38]
Rafiee R, Ghorbanhosseini A. Developing a micro-macro mechanical approach for evaluating long-term creep in composite cylinders. Thin-walled Structures, 2020, 151: 106714
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
RafieeRGhorbanhosseiniA. Experimental and theoretical investigations of creep on a composite pipe under compressive transverse loading. Fibers and Polymers, 2021, 22(1):222–230
[40]
Rafiee R, Ghorbanhosseini A. Analyzing the long-term creep behavior of composite pipes: Developing an alternative scenario of short-term multi-stage loading test. Composite Structures, 2020, 254: 112868
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Rafiee R, Mazhari B. Simulation of long-term hydrostatic tests on glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes. Composite Structures, 2016, 136: 56–63
[42]
Rafiee R, Mazhari B. Evaluating long-term performance of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes subjected to internal pressure. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 122: 694–701
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Shaaban A M, Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Rabczuk T. An isogeometric Burton-Miller method for the transmission loss optimization with application to mufflers with internal extended tubes. Applied Acoustics, 2022, 185: 108410
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Shaaban A M, Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Rabczuk T. 3D isogeometric boundary element analysis and structural shape optimization for Helmholtz acoustic scattering problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 384: 113950
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Shaaban A M, Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Rabczuk T. Isogeometric boundary element analysis and shape optimization by PSO for 3D axi-symmetric high frequency Helmholtz acoustic problems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 486: 115598
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Shaaban A M, Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Rabczuk T. Shape optimization by conventional and extended isogeometric boundary element method with PSO for two-dimensional Helmholtz acoustic problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2020, 113: 156–169
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Ghasemi H, Park H S, Rabczuk T. A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 332: 47–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Ghasemi H, Park H S, Rabczuk T. A level-set based IGA formulation for topology optimization of flexoelectric materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 313: 239–258
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Iranian National Science Foundation (INSF) under contract 4003139.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2742 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/