Optimization of polyurethane-bonded thin overlay mixture designation for airport pavement

Abstract

This research explored the application potential of PUM thin-overlay technology on airport rapid maintenance. The rapid curing process of polyurethane binder determines the limited time window for mixing and construction of polyurethane-bonded mixture (PUM), which presents significant difference with hot-mix asphalt (HMA) technology. Therefore, this research investigated and optimized the mix design of PUM for airport thin-overlay technology based on its thermosetting characteristics. First, limestone and basalt were comprehensively compared as an aggregate for PUM. Then, the effects of molding and curing conditions were studied in terms of mixing time, molding method, molding parameters and curing temperature. Statistical analysis was also conducted to evaluate the effects of gradation and particle size on PUM performances based on gray relational analysis (GRA), thus determining the key particle size to control PUM performances. Finally, the internal structural details of PUM were captured by X-ray CT scan test. The results demonstrated that it only took 12 hours to reach 75% of maximum strength at a curing temperature of 50 °C, indicating an efficient curing process and in turn allowing short traffic delay. The internal structural details of PUM presented distribution of tiny pores with few connective voids, guaranteeing waterproof property and high strength.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

polyurethane-bonded mixture / mix design optimization / airport pavement / thin overlay / gray relational analysis

References

[1] Liu Y, You Z, Li L, Wang W. Review on advances in modeling and simulation of stone-based paving materials. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 43(5): 408–417

[2] Yuan J, Wang J, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S, Wang J, Xu Z. Impacts of multiple-polymer components on high temperature performance characteristics of airfield modified binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 134(1): 694–702

[3] Wang H, Xie P, Ji R, Gagnon J. Prediction of airfield pavement responses from surface deflections: Comparison between the traditional backcalculation approach and the ANN model. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2021, 22(9): 1930–1945

[4] Mirza J, Bhutta M A R, Tahir M M. In situ performance of field-moulded joint sealants in dams. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 41(8): 889–896

[5] Zhao Z, Guan X, Xiao F, Xie Z, Xia P, Zhou Q. Applications of asphalt concrete overlay on Portland cement concrete pavement. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 264(1): 120045

[6] Das P K, Baaj H, Tighe S, Kringos N. Atomic force microscopy to investigate asphalt binders: A state-of-the-art review. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2016, 17(3): 693–718

[7] Li J, Yao S, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S N. Surface modification of ground tire rubber particles by cold plasma to improve compatibility in rubberised asphalt. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2022, 23(3): 651–662

[8] Li J, Xiao F, Zhang L, Amirkhanian S N. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 233(7): 1182–1206

[9] Afzal A, Kausar A, Siddiq M. Role of polymeric composite in civil engineering applications: A review. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials, 2020, 59(10): 1023–1040

[10] Xu L, Li X, Zong Q, Xiao F. Chemical, morphological and rheological investigations of SBR/SBS modified asphalt emulsions with waterborne acrylate and polyurethane. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 272(9): 121972

[11] He Q, Zhang H, Li J, Duan H. Performance evaluation of polyurethane/epoxy resin modified asphalt as adhesive layer material for steel-UHPC composite bridge deck pavements. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 291(6): 123364

[12] Cong L, Yang F, Guo G, Ren M, Shi J, Tan L. The use of polyurethane for asphalt pavement engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 225(1): 1012–1025

[13] Hu Z X, Hu X M, Cheng W M, Zhao Y Y, Wu M Y. Performance optimization of one-component polyurethane healing agent for self-healing concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 179(9): 151–159

[14] Khatoon H, Ahmad S. A review on conducting polymer reinforced polyurethane composites. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2017, 53(September): 1–22

[15] Xu L, Hou X, Li X, Xiao F. Impact of constituent migration on colloid structure and rheological characteristics of emulsified asphalt with self-crosslinking modifiers. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2021, 619: 126530

[16] Somarathna H M C C, Raman S N, Mohotti D, Mutalib A A, Badri K H. The use of polyurethane for structural and infrastructural engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 190(4): 995–1014

[17] Izquierdo M A, Navarro F J, Martínez-Boza F J, Gallegos C. Bituminous polyurethane foams for building applications: Influence of bitumen hardness. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 30(1): 706–713

[18] Sun M, Zheng M, Qu G, Yuan K, Bi Y, Wang J. Performance of polyurethane modified asphalt and its mixtures. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 191(2): 386–397

[19] Li X, Li J, Wang J, Yuan J, Jiang F, Yu X, Xiao F. Recent applications and developments of Polyurethane materials in pavement engineering. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 304(10): 124639

[20] Min S, Bi Y, Zheng M, Chen S, Li J. Evaluation of a cold-mixed high-performance polyurethane mixture. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 2019(1): 1–12

[21] Lu G, Liu P, Törzs T, Wang D, Oeser M, Grabe J. Numerical analysis for the influence of saturation on the base course of permeable pavement with a novel polyurethane binder. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 240(3): 117930

[22] Lu G, Renken L, Li T, Wang D, Li H, Oeser M. Experimental study on the polyurethane-bound pervious mixtures in the application of permeable pavements. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 202(11): 838–850

[23] Chen J, Ma X, Wang H, Xie P, Huang W. Experimental study on anti-icing and deicing performance of polyurethane concrete as road surface layer. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 161(1): 598–605

[24] Gao J, Wang H, Chen J, Meng X, You Z. Laboratory evaluation on comprehensive performance of polyurethane rubber particle mixture. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 224(3): 29–39

[25] Chen J, Yin X, Wang H, Ding Y. Evaluation of durability and functional performance of porous polyurethane mixture in porous pavement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 188(3): 12–19

[26] Cong L, Wang T, Tan L, Yuan J, Shi J. Laboratory evaluation on performance of porous polyurethane mixtures and OGFC. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 169(1): 436–442

[27] Wang D, Schacht A, Leng Z, Leng C, Kollmann J, Oeser M. Effects of material composition on mechanical and acoustic performance of poroelastic road surface (PERS). Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 135(1): 352–360

[28] Törzs T, Lu G, Monteiro A O, Wang D, Grabe J, Oeser M. Hydraulic properties of polyurethane-bound permeable pavement materials considering unsaturated flow. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 212: 422–430

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant number of 51861145402.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press