Classification and quantification of excavated soil and construction sludge: A case study in Wenzhou, China

Qimeng GUO, Liangtong ZHAN, Yunyang SHEN, Linbo WU, Yunmin CHEN

PDF(4555 KB)
PDF(4555 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 202-213. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-021-0795-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Classification and quantification of excavated soil and construction sludge: A case study in Wenzhou, China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

With rapid urbanization in China, a large amount of excavated soil and construction sludge is being generated from geotechnical and underground engineering. For sustainable management of these construction wastes, it is essential to quantify their production first. The present study has attempted to classify the excavated soil and construction sludge according to their composition and geotechnical properties (particle size, water content, plasticity index). Based on these classifications, a new approach was proposed to quantify the production. The said approach was based on multi-source information, such as the urban topographic map, geological survey reports, urban master plan, and remote sensing images. A case study in Wenzhou city of China was also pursued to illustrate the validity of the newly developed approach. The research showed that in 2021–2025, the total excavated soils and construction sludge production in Wenzhou would reach 107.5 × 106 and 81.7 × 106 m3, respectively. Furthermore, the excavated soil was classified into the miscellaneous fill, crust clay, muddy clay and mud with silty sand. Likewise, the construction sludge was classified as liquid sludge and paste-like sludge. The classification and quantification can serve as guidance for disposal and recycling, thereby leading to high-level management of waste disposal.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

excavated soil / construction sludge / geotechnical and underground engineering / production / classification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qimeng GUO, Liangtong ZHAN, Yunyang SHEN, Linbo WU, Yunmin CHEN. Classification and quantification of excavated soil and construction sludge: A case study in Wenzhou, China. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 202‒213 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0795-8

References

[1]
Zhang N, Duan H, Sun P, Li J, Zuo J, Mao R C, Liu G, Niu Y N. Characterizing the generation and environmental impacts of subway-related excavated soil and rock in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 248 : 119242
[2]
TheU.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Characterization of Building-related Construction and Demolition Debris in the United States. Report No. EPA530-R-98-010. 1998
[3]
WRAP. Guidelines for Measuring and Reporting Construction, Demolition and Excavation Waste. 2010
[4]
KatsumiT. Soil excavation and reclamation in civil engineering: Environmental aspects. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2015, 61(Suppl 1): 22–29
[5]
Kamon M, Katsumi T, Imanishi H. Utilization system of waste slurry from construction works. Bulletin of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, 1993, 43( 4): 73–89
[6]
Kupusamy K, Nagapan S, Abdullah A H, Kaliannan S, Maniam H. Construction waste estimation analysis in residential projects of Malaysia. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 2019, 9( 5): 4842–4845
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Qiao L, Liu D D, Yuan X, Wang Q, Ma Q. Generation and prediction of construction and demolition waste using exponential smoothing method: A case study of Shandong province, China. Sustainability, 2020, 12( 12): 5094–5105
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Lu W S, Lou J F, Webster C, Xue F, Bao Z K, Chi B. Estimating construction waste generation in the Greater Bay Area, China using machine learning. Waste Management, 2021, 134( 10): 78–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Cochran K, Townsend T, Reinhart D, Heck H. Estimation of regional building-related C&D debris generation and composition: Case study for Florida, US. Waste Management, 2007, 27( 7): 921–931
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Llatas C. A model for quantifying construction waste in projects according to the European waste list. Waste Management, 2011, 31( 6): 1261–1276
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Li J, Ding Z, Mi X, Wang J. A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2013, 74( 5): 20–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Ding Z K, Liu R S, Wang Y F, Tam V W, Ma M X. An agent-based model approach for urban demolition waste quantification and a management framework for stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 285( 2): 124897
[13]
Huang S L, Hsu W L. Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 63( 2): 61–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Rosado L, Niza S, Ferrão P. A material flow accounting case study of the Lisbon metropolitan area using the urban metabolism analyst model. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2014, 18( 1): 84–101
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Guo D M, Huang L Z. The state of the art of material flow analysis research based on construction and demolition waste recycling and disposal. Buildings, 2019, 9( 10): 207–217
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Gao X F, Nakatani J, Zhang Q, Huang B J, Wang T, Moriguchi Y. Dynamic material flow and stock analysis of residential buildings by integrating rural-urban land transition: A case of Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253( 4): 119941
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wu H, Wang J, Duan H, Ouyang L, Huang W, Zuo J. An innovative approach to managing demolition waste via GIS (geographic information system): A case study in Shenzhen city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112 : 494–503
[18]
Kataguiri K, Boscov M, Teixeira C E, Angulo S C. Characterization flowchart for assessing the potential reuse of excavation soils in Sao Paulo city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 240 : 118215
[19]
Kamon M, Katsumi T, Inui T. Dehydration-solidification treatment and geotechnical utilization of waste sludge from construction works. Environmental Geotechnics, 1998, 603–608
[20]
Kamon M, Inazumi S, Rajasekaran G, Katsumi T. Evaluation of waste sludge compatibility for landfill cover application. Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society Soils & Foundation, 2002, 42( 4): 13–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Katsumi T, Kamon M, Inui T. Japanese status on the use of waste and by-products in geotechnical applications. recycled materials in geotechnics. Sessions at ASCE Civil Engineering Conference & Exposition, 2005, 22–41
[22]
JapaneseMinistry of Land. Ministerial Ordinance for Determining the Standards of Judgment Concerning the Use of Recycled Resources for Persons Engaged in Construction Business. 2001 (in Japanese)
[23]
Mori M, Takahashi H, Ousaka A, Horii K, Kataoka I, Ishii T, Kotani K. A proposal for a new recycling system for high-water content muds by using paper debris and polymer and strength property of recycled soils. Journal of the Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan, 2003, 119( 4): 155–160
[24]
Takahashi H. State-of-the-art and future problems of countermeasures for excavated soils discharged from excavation construction. Micro-Tunneling Technology, 2006, 20( 4): 3–8
[25]
Yamazaki J, Takahashi H, Kanari H, Mori M. An experimental study on production of planting soil from the viewpoint of soil physical properties. Journal of the Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan, 2008, 124( 12): 818–823
[26]
Gulsen F, Inui T, Kato T, Takai A, Katsumi T. Numerical investigation on utilization of natural contaminated soil in the embankments. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics. Singapore: Springer, 2018, 466–473
[27]
Meda S R, Sharma S K, Tyagi G D. Utilization of waste sludge as a construction material—A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 46( 9): 4195–4202
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Murakami O, Masuda T, Hanada O, Tamura T, Kamao S. Recycling and treatment of construction sludge. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2012, 155 : 1129–1138
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Takahashi H. Topical Themes in Energy and Resources. Tokyo: Springer, 2015, 177–194
[30]
Magnusson S, Lundberg K, Svedberg B, Knutsson S. Sustainable management of excavated soil and rock in urban areas—A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 93( 4): 18–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Yamana M, Tomizawa Y, Fujiwara T, Mizuta K, Mizuno K, Inui T, Katsumi T, Kamon M. Management of the Soils Discharged from Shield Tunnel Excavation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics. Singapore: Springer, 2018, 374–381
[32]
Katsumi T, Inui T, Yasutaka T, Takai A. Towards sustainable soil management—Reuse of excavated soils with natural contamination. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics. Singapore: Springer, 2018, 99–118
[33]
WenzhouPlanningNaturalResources Bureau. Master Plan of Wenzhou City (2021–2025). 2017 (in Chinese)
[34]
WenzhouPlanningNaturalResources Bureau. Master Plan of Wenzhou City (2016–2020). 2012 (in Chinese)
[35]
WenzhouMunicipal People’s Government. Notice of the Office of WenzhouMunicipal People’s Government on Printing and Distributing the Three Year Action Plan for Major Construction Projects in Wenzhou (2016–2018). 2016 (in Chinese)
[36]
WenzhouMunicipal People’s Government. Short Term Construction Planning of Wenzhou Urban Rail Transit (2020–2026). 2019 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Key Research and Development Program (No. 2019C03107) and China National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2018YFC1802300).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press 2022
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4555 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/