Comparative seismic design optimization of spatial steel dome structures through three recent metaheuristic algorithms

Abstract

Steel dome structures, with their striking structural forms, take a place among the impressive and aesthetic load bearing systems featuring large internal spaces without internal columns. In this paper, the seismic design optimization of spatial steel dome structures is achieved through three recent metaheuristic algorithms that are water strider (WS), grey wolf (GW), and brain storm optimization (BSO). The structural elements of the domes are treated as design variables collected in member groups. The structural stress and stability limitations are enforced by ASD-AISC provisions. Also, the displacement restrictions are considered in design procedure. The metaheuristic algorithms are encoded in MATLAB interacting with SAP2000 for gathering structural reactions through open application programming interface (OAPI). The optimum spatial steel dome designs achieved by proposed WS, GW, and BSO algorithms are compared with respect to solution accuracy, convergence rates, and reliability, utilizing three real-size design examples for considering both the previously reported optimum design results obtained by classical metaheuristic algorithms and a gradient descent-based hyperband optimization (HBO) algorithm.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

steel dome optimization / water strider algorithm / grey wolf algorithm / brain storm optimization algorithm / hyperband optimization algorithm

References

[1] MakowskiZ S. Braced domes, their history, modern trends and recent developments. Architectural Science Review, 1962, 5( 2): 62– 79

[2] MakowskiZ S. Analysis, Design, and Construction of Braced Domes. New York: Nichols Publishing Company, 1984

[3] ManhorK, AnnigeriA P. Analysis and comparing result of lamella dome and schwedler dome under application of external loads. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 2019, 4( 6): 206– 209

[4] VaznaR V, ZarrinM. Sensitivity analysis of double layer Diamatic dome space structure collapse behavior. Engineering Structures, 2020, 212 : 110511–

[5] GuanY, VirginL N, HelmD. Structural behavior of shallow geodesic lattice domes. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 155 : 225– 239

[6] LebedE. Initial stress state at installation of a single-layer lattice dome due to errors of its assembly. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 869( 5): 052010–

[7] ZabojszczaP, RadońU. The impact of node location imperfections on the reliability of single-layer steel domes. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 9( 13): 2742–

[8] ZabojszczaP, RadońU, ObaraP. Impact of single-layer dome modelling on the critical load capacity. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, 219 : 02017–

[9] Binti RoselyN N A. Analysis of Structure Behaviour of Domes. Undergraduates Project Papers. Pahang: University Malaysia Pahang, 2015

[10] DedeT, GrzywińskiM, SelejdakJ. Continuous size optimization of large-scale dome structures with dynamic constraints. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2020, 73 : 397– 405

[11] Dede T, Grzywiński M, Venkata Rao R. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Berlin: Springer, 2020, 13−20

[12] LuM, YeJ. Guided genetic algorithm for dome optimization against instability with discrete variables. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 139 : 149– 156

[13] GrzywińskiM, DedeT, ÖzdemírY I. Optimization of the braced dome structures by using Jaya algorithm with frequency constraints. Steel and Composite Structures, 2019, 30 : 47– 55

[14] Abu-FarsakhG, Al-HuthaifiN. Optimal aspect-ratio for various types of braced domes under gravity loads. Journal of Civil Engineering and Structures, 2018, 2( 3): 1– 7

[15] KavehA, JavadiS M. Chaos-based firefly algorithms for optimization of cyclically large-size braced steel domes with multiple frequency constraints. Computers & Structures, 2019, 214 : 28– 39

[16] GrzywińskiM. Teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm for design of braced dome structures. In: Proceedings of XXIV LSCE Conference 2018. Lodz: Lodz University of Technology, 2018, 57– 60

[17] KavehA, RezaeiM. Optimum topology design of geometrically nonlinear suspended domes using ECBO. Structural Engineering and Mechanics: An international journal, 2015, 56( 4): 667– 694

[18] KavehA, RezaeiM. Topology and geometry optimization of single-layer domes utilizing CBO and ECBO. Scientia Iranica, 2016, 23( 2): 535– 547

[19] KavehA, Ilchi GhazaanM. A new hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for optimal design of large-scale dome structures. Engineering Optimization, 2018, 50( 2): 235– 252

[20] YeJ, LuM. Optimization of domes against instability. Steel and Composite Structures, 2018, 28 : 427– 438

[21] ZhangH, LiangX, GaoZ, ZhuX. Seismic performance analysis of a large-scale single-layer lattice dome with a hybrid three-directional seismic isolation system. Engineering Structures, 2020, 214 : 110627–

[22] LiY G, FanF, HongH P. Reliability of lattice dome with and without the effect of using small number of ground motion records in seismic design. Engineering Structures, 2017, 151 : 381– 390

[23] KimY-S, KangJ-W, KimG-C. The seismic response analysis of lattice dome according to direction of seismic load. Journal of the Korean Association for Spatial Structures, 2018, 18( 3): 133– 140

[24] ParkK-G, LeeD-W. Reducing effect analysis on earthquake response of 100m spanned single-layered lattice domes with LRB seismic isolation system. Journal of the Korean Association for Spatial Structures, 2019, 19( 1): 53– 64

[25] ParkK-G, ChungM-J, LeeD-W. Earthquake response analysis for seismic isolation system of single layer lattice domes with 300m span. Journal of the Korean Association for Spatial Structures, 2018, 18( 3): 105– 116

[26] DingY, ChenZ T, ZongL, YanJ B. A theoretical strut model for severe seismic analysis of single-layer reticulated domes. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 128 : 661– 671

[27] YangD, LiuC Y, HuM N, ZhangX. Seismic analysis of single-layer latticed domes composed of welded round pipes considering low cycle fatigue. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2017, 17( 10): 1750122–

[28] SalebI S, MuhsenT A. Dynamic response of braced domes under earthquake load. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2018, 9 : 29– 39

[29] Ooki Y, Kasai K, Motoyui S. Steel dome structure with viscoelastic dampers for seismic damage mitigation. In: Stessa 2003. Routledge, 2018, 641−648

[30] HosseinizadS A. Seismic response of lattice domes. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Surrey: University of Surrey, 2018

[31] AISC-ASD. Manual of Steel Construction: Allowable Stress Design, 1989

[32] KavehA, Dadras EslamlouA. Water strider algorithm: A new metaheuristic and applications. Structures, 2020, 25 : 520– 541

[33] MirjaliliS, MirjaliliS M, LewisA. Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, 69 : 46– 61

[34] ShiY. Brain storm optimization algorithm. In: International Conference in Swarm Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, 2011,

[35] MATLAB. The Language of Technical Computing, 2009

[36] SAP2000. Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, 2008

[37] CarbasS, ToktasA, UstunD. Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Engineering Optimization Applications. 1st ed. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte. Ltd., 2021

[38] KavehA, GhazaanM I. Meta-heuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Real-size Structures. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018

[39] KavehA. Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016

[40] YangX S. Nature-Inspired Algorithms and Applied Optimization. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018

[41] YangX S. Engineering Optimization: An Introduction with Metaheuristic Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010

[42] YangX S, DeyN, Fong S. Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing (STNIC). Cham: Springer Nature, 2020

[43] ZhuangX, GuoH, AlajlanN, ZhuH, RabczukT. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 2021, 87 : 104225–

[44] SamaniegoE, AnitescuC, GoswamiS, Nguyen-ThanhV M, GuoH, HamdiaK, ZhuangX, RabczukT. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362 : 112790–

[45] AnitescuC, AtroshchenkoE, AlajlanN, RabczukT. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials and Continua, 2019, 59( 1): 345– 359

[46] GuoH, ZhuangX, RabczukT. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59( 2): 433– 456

[47] HamdiaK M, GhasemiH, BaziY, AlHichriH, AlajlanN, RabczukT. A novel deep learning based method for the computational material design of flexoelectric nanostructures with topology optimization. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2019, 165 : 21– 30

[48] SaremiS, MirjaliliS Z, MirjaliliS M. Evolutionary population dynamics and grey wolf optimizer. Neural Computing & Applications, 2015, 26( 5): 1257– 1263

[49] ChengS, ShiY. Brain Storm Optimization Algorithms: Concepts, Principles and Applications. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019

[50] AldhafeeriA, Rahmat-SamiiY. Brain Storm Optimization for Electromagnetic Applications: Continuous and Discrete. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2019, 67( 4): 2710– 2722

[51] ChengS, QinQ, ChenJ, ShiY. Brain storm optimization algorithm: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2016, 46( 4): 445– 458

[52] AydogduI, CarbasS, AkinA. Effect of Levy Flight on the discrete optimum design of steel skeletal structures using metaheuristics. Steel and Composite Structures, 2017, 24( 1): 93– 112

[53] AmericanAssociation of State Highway, TransportationOfficials (AASHTO). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. AASHTO, 2012

[54] LeeK S, GeemZ W. A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Computers & Structures, 2004, 82( 9−10): 781– 798

[55] ArtarM. A comparative study on optimum design of multi-element truss structures. Steel and Composite Structures, 2016, 22( 3): 521– 535

[56] KavehA, Ilchi GhazaanM. Optimal design of dome truss structures with dynamic frequency constraints. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53( 3): 605– 621

[57] HasancebiO, ErdalF, SakaM P. Optimum design of geodesic steel domes under code provisions using metaheuristic techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2010, 2 : 88– 103

[58] HasançebiO, ÇarbaşS, DoǧanE, ErdalF, SakaM P. Performance evaluation of metaheuristic search techniques in the optimum design of real size pin jointed structures. Computers & Structures, 2009, 87( 5−6): 284– 302

[59] KavehA, TalatahariS. A discrete Big Bang−Big Crunch algorithm for optimal design of skeletal structures. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 11 : 103– 122

[60] LiL, JamiesonK, DeSalvoG, RostamizadehA, TalwalkarA. Hyperband: A novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2016, 18 : 1– 52

[61] SohC K, YangJ. Fuzzy controlled genetic algorithm search for shape optimization. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 1996, 10( 2): 143– 150

[62] ASCE/SEI7-10. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press 2021.