Destructive and non-destructive evaluation of concrete for optimum sand to aggregate volume ratio

Abstract

Aggregates are the biggest contributor to concrete volume and are a crucial parameter in dictating its mechanical properties. As such, a detailed experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of sand-to-aggregate volume ratio (s/a) on the mechanical properties of concrete utilizing both destructive and non-destructive testing (employing UPV (ultrasonic pulse velocity) measurements). For investigation, standard cylindrical concrete samples were made with different s/a (0.36, 0.40, 0.44, 0.48, 0.52, and 0.56), cement content (340 and 450 kg/m³), water-to-cement ratio (0.45 and 0.50), and maximum aggregate size (12 and 19 mm). The effect of these design parameters on the 7, 14, and 28 d compressive strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus, and UPV of concrete were assessed. The careful analysis demonstrates that aggregate proportions and size need to be optimized for formulating mix designs; optimum ratios of s/a were found to be 0.40 and 0.44 for the maximum aggregate size of 12 and 19 mm, respectively, irrespective of the W/C (water-to-cement) and cement content.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

aggregates / non-destructive testing / sand-to-aggregate volume ratio (s/a) / maximum aggregate size (MAS)

References

[1] Sagoe-Crentsil K K, Brown T, Taylor A H. Performance of concrete made with commercially produced coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Cement and concrete research, 2001, 31( 5): 707– 712

[2] Okonkwo V, Emmanuel E. A study of the effect of aggregate proportioning on concrete properties. American Journal of Engineering Research, 2018, 7 : 61– 67

[3] Deepa C, Sathiya Kumari K, Sudha V P. Prediction of the compressive strength of high performance concrete mix using tree based modeling. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 2010, 6( 5): 18– 24

[4] Concrete Committee of JSCE. No. 16: Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures–2007. Materials and Construction. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE), 2007

[5] Bloem D L, Gaynor R D. Effects of aggregate properties on strength of concrete. Journal Proceedings, 1963, 60( 10): 1429– 1456

[6] Uddin M T, Mahmood A H, Kamal M R I, Yashin S M, Zihan Z U A. Effects of maximum size of brick aggregate on properties of concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 134 : 713– 726

[7] Yan S, Li J Z, Yang H Q, Lin Y Q. Effect of the maximum aggregate size on mechanical properties of four-grade RCC. In: 2011 International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering (ICETCE). Lushan: IEEE, 2011

[8] Mardani-Aghabaglou A, Son A E, Felekoglu B, Ramyar K. Effect of cement fineness on properties of cementitious materials containing high range water reducing admixture. Journal of Green Building, 2017, 12( 1): 142– 167

[9] Shen W, Yang Z G, Cao L H, Cao L, Liu Y, Yang H, Lu Z L, Bai J. Characterization of manufactured sand: Particle shape, surface texture and behavior in concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 114 : 595– 601

[10] Jamkar S, Rao C J C, Research C. Index of aggregate particle shape and texture of coarse aggregate as a parameter for concrete mix proportioning. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34( 11): 2021– 2027

[11] Bashandy A A, Soliman N M. Influence of fine to coarse aggregate ratio and curing temperatures on the behavior of concrete. Engineering Research Journal, 2013, 138 : 30– 41

[12] Lin W T. Effects of sand/aggregate ratio on strength, durability, and microstructure of self-compacting concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 242 : 118046–

[13] Ruiz W M. Effect of Volume of Aggregate on the Elastic and Inelastic Properties of Concrete. Cornell University, 1966

[14] Carrillo J, Ramirez J, Lizarazo-Marriaga J. Modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of fiber-reinforced concrete in Colombia from ultrasonic pulse velocities. Journal of Building Engineering, 2019, 23 : 18– 26

[15] Mendes S E S, Oliveira R L N, Cremonez C, Pereira E, Pereira E, Medeiros-Junior R A. Electrical resistivity as a durability parameter for concrete design: Experimental data versus estimation by mathematical model. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 192 : 610– 620

[16] Medeiros-Junior R A, Gans P S, Pereira E, Pereira E. Electrical resistivity of concrete exposed to chlorides and sulfates. ACI Materials Journal, 2019, 116(3)

[17] Mazer W, Lima M G, Medeiros-Junior R A. Fuzzy logic for estimating chloride diffusion in concrete. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 2018, 171( 7): 542– 551

[18] de Bem D H, Lima D P B, Medeiros-Junior R A. Effect of chemical admixtures on concrete’s electrical resistivity. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 2018, 36( 2): 174– 187

[19] Anderson D A, Seals R K. Pulse velocity as a predictor of 28- and 90-day strength. Journal Proceedings. 1981, 78(2): 116– 122

[20] Kaplan M. The effects of age and water/cement ratio upon the relation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1959, 11( 32): 85– 92

[21] Popovics S, Rose J L, Popovics J S. The behaviour of ultrasonic pulses in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1990, 20( 2): 259– 270

[22] Turgut P. Evaluation of the ultrasonic pulse velocity data coming on the field. In: 4th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components. London, 2004

[23] Kheder G. A two stage procedure for assessment of in situ concrete strength using combined non-destructive testing. Materials and Structures, 1999, 32( 6): 410– 417

[24] Elvery R H, Ibrahim L A M. Ultrasonic assessment of concrete strength at early ages. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1976, 28( 97): 181– 190

[25] Jones R. The ultrasonic testing of concrete. Ultrasonics, 1963, 1( 2): 78– 82

[26] Trtnik G, Kavčič F, Turk G. Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics, 2009, 49( 1): 53– 60

[27] Mohammed T U, Mahmood A H. Effects of maximum aggregate size on UPV of brick aggregate concrete. Ultrasonics, 2016, 69 : 129– 136

[28] Abo-Qudais S A. Effect of concrete mixing parameters on propagation of ultrasonic waves. Construction & Building Materials, 2005, 19( 4): 257– 263

[29] Tanigawa Y, Baba K, Mori H. Estimation of concrete strength by combined nondestructive testing method. Special Publication, 1984, 82 : 57– 76

[30] Yıldırım H, Sengul O. Modulus of elasticity of substandard and normal concretes. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25( 4): 1645– 1652

[31] Ben-Zeitun A E. Use of pulse velocity to predict compressive strength of concrete. International Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete, 1986, 8( 1): 51– 59

[32] Del Rıo L M, Jimenez A, Lopez F, Rosa F J, Rufo M M, Paniagua J M. Characterization and hardening of concrete with ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics, 2004, 42( 1– 9): 1– 9

[33] Ohdaira E, Masuzawa N. Water content and its effect on ultrasound propagation in concrete—The possibility of NDE. Ultrasonics, 2000, 38( 1−8): 546– 552

[34] Mohammed T U, Rahman M N. Effect of types of aggregate and sand-to-aggregate volume ratio on UPV in concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 125 : 832– 841

[35] ASTM . Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, ASTM C33 / C33M–16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2016

[36] BDS EN 197–1: 2000 Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. London: British Standards Institution, 2000

[37] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, ASTM C127-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2015

[38] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate, ASTM C128-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2015

[39] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate. ASTM C29/C29M-17a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2017

[40] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion Resistance and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine, ASTM C131. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2006

[41] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, ASTM C136/C136M-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2019

[42] ASTM . Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory, ASTM C192. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2018

[43] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM C39/C39M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2016

[44] ASTM . Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimen, ASTM C496/C496M-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2011

[45] ASTM . Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, ASTM C597-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM , 2016

[46] Panzera T H, Christoforo A L, Cota F P, Borges P R, Bowen C R. Ultrasonic pulse velocity evaluation of cementitious materials. Advances in Composite Materials − Analysis of Natural and Man-Made Materials, 2011, 17 : 411– 436

[47] Shin H O, Yoo D Y, Lee J H, Lee S H, Yoon Y S. Optimized mix design for 180 MPa ultra-high-strength concrete. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019, 8( 5): 4182– 4197

[48] ACI 318–14 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2014

[49] Mendes S E S, Oliveira R L N, Cremonez C, Pereira E, Pereira E, Medeiros-Junior R A. Mixture Design of Concrete Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 18( 1): 113– 122

[50] Nash’t I H, A’bour S H, Sadoon A A. Finding an unified relationship between crushing strength of concrete and non-destructive tests. In: Middle East Nondestructive Testing Conference & Exhibition. Manama: Citeseer, 2005

[51] Turgut P. Research into the correlation between concrete strength and UPV values. e-Journal of NDT, 2004, 12( 12): 1– 9

[52] Hedjazi S, Castillo D. Relationships among compressive strength and UPV of concrete reinforced with different types of fibers. Heliyon, 2020, 6( 3): e03646–

[53] Nash’t I H, A’bour S H, Sadoon A A. Finding an unified relationship between crushing strength of concrete and non-destructive tests. In: Middle East Nondestructive Testing Conference & Exhibition. 2005, 27– 30

[54] Solís-Carcaño R, Moreno E I. Evaluation of concrete made with crushed limestone aggregate based on ultrasonic pulse velocity. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22( 6): 1225– 1231

[55] Lin Y, Shih-Fang K, Hsiao C, Chao-Peng L. Investigation of pulse velocity-strength relationship of hardened concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 2007, 104( 4): 344–

[56] Bogas J A, Gomes M G, Gomes A. Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight concrete by non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity method. Ultrasonics, 2013, 53( 5): 962– 972

[57] Ghosh R, Sagar S P, Kumar A, Gupta S K, Kumar S. Estimation of geopolymer concrete strength from ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) using high power pulser. Journal of building engineering, 2018, 16 : 39– 44

[58] Mahure N, Vijh G K, Sharma P, Sivakumar N, Ratnam M. Correlation between pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2011, 4( 6): 871– 874

[59] Panzera T H, Rubio J C, Bowen C R, Vasconcelos W L, Strecker K. Correlation between structure and pulse velocity of cementitious composites. Advances in cement research, 2008, 20( 3): 101– 108

[60] Gameiro F, De Brito J, Correia da Silva D. Durability performance of structural concrete containing fine aggregates from waste generated by marble quarrying industry. Engineering Structures, 2014, 59 : 654– 662

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press 2021.