Upper bound solution to seismic active earth pressure of submerged backfill subjected to partial drainage

Zhengqiang ZENG, Shengzhi WU, Cheng LYU

PDF(21266 KB)
PDF(21266 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6) : 1480-1493. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-021-0776-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Upper bound solution to seismic active earth pressure of submerged backfill subjected to partial drainage

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In waterfront geotechnical engineering, seismic and drainage conditions must be considered in the design of retaining structures. This paper proposes a general analytical method to evaluate the seismic active earth pressure on a retaining wall with backfill subjected to partial steady seepage flow under seismic conditions. The method comprises the following steps: i) determination of the total head, ii) upper bound solution of seismic active earth thrust, and iii) deduction for the earth pressure distribution. The determination of total head h(x,z) relies on the Fourier series expansions, and the expressions of the seismic active earth thrust and pressure are derived by using the upper bound theorem. Parametric studies reveal that insufficient drainage and earthquakes are crucial factors that cause unfavorable earth pressure. The numerical results confirm the validity of the total head distribution. Comparisons indicate that the proposed method is consistent with other relevant existing methods in terms of predicting seismic active earth pressure. The method can be applied to the seismic design of waterfront retaining walls.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

seismic active earth pressure / partial seepage flow / pore pressure / anisotropy / upper bound theorem

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhengqiang ZENG, Shengzhi WU, Cheng LYU. Upper bound solution to seismic active earth pressure of submerged backfill subjected to partial drainage. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1480‒1493 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0776-y

References

[1]
Choudhury D, Nimbalkar S S. Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24( 5): 1103– 1113
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Choudhury D, Katdare A D, Pain A. New method to compute seismic active earth pressure on retaining wall considering seismic waves. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2014, 32( 2): 391– 402
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Krabbenhoft K. Static and seismic earth pressure coefficients for vertical walls with horizontal backfill. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 104 : 403– 407
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Kolathayar S, Ghosh P. Seismic active earth pressure on walls with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36( 7): 1229– 1236
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Shukla S K, Gupta S K, Sivakugan N. Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c−ϕ soil backfill under seismic loading condition. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135( 5): 690– 696
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Scotto di Santolo A, Evangelista A. Dynamic active earth pressure on cantilever retaining walls. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38( 8): 1041– 1051
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Xu S Y, Shamsabadi A, Taciroglu E. Evaluation of active and passive seismic earth pressures considering internal friction and cohesion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 70 : 30– 47
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Vrettos C, Beskos D E, Triantafyllidis T. Seismic pressures on rigid cantilever walls retaining elastic continuously non-homogeneous soil: An exact solution. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 82 : 142– 153
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Brandenberg S J, Mylonakis G, Stewart J P. Approximate solution for seismic earth pressures on rigid walls retaining inhomogeneous elastic soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 97 : 468– 477
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Okabe S. General theory of earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining wall and dam. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1924, 10(6): 1924−1323 (in Japanese)
[11]
Mononobe N, Matsuo H. On the determination of earth pressure during earthquakes. Proceedings of the World Engineering Congress, 1929, 9: 177– 185 (in Japanese)
[12]
Ebeling R M, Morrison E E. The Seismic Design of Waterfront Retaining Structures. US Army Technical Report ITL-92-11 and US Navy Technical Report NCEL TR-9391993. 1993
[13]
Iskander M, Chen Z, Omidvar M, Guzman I, Elsherif O. Active static and seismic earth pressure for c–φ soils. Soil and Foundation, 2013, 53( 5): 639– 652
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Choudhury D, Nimbalkar S. Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method. Geotechnique, 2005, 55( 9): 699– 702
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ghosh P. Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45( 1): 117– 123
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Wang J J, Zhang H P, Liu M W, Chen Y Y. Seismic passive earth pressure with seepage for cohesionless soil. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2012, 30( 1): 86– 101
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wang J J, Zhang H P, Chai H J, Zhu J G. Seismic passive resistance with vertical seepage and surcharge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 28( 9): 728– 737
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Huang R, Xia T D, Liu Z J. Seismic passive earth thrust of submerged backfill with two-dimensional steady seepage. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22( 3): 1062– 1069
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Harr M E. Groundwater and Seepage. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962
[20]
Wang J J, Liu F C, Ji C L. Influence of drainage condition on Coulomb-type active earth pressure. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2008, 45( 5): 161– 167
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Zhang B J, Cao J, Zhang X Z. Calculation of water-soil pressure of silt layer in the foundation pit considering the seepage effect. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 568 : 176– 181
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Barros P L A. A Coulomb-type solution for active earth thrust with seepage. Geotechnique, 2006, 56( 3): 159– 164
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Hu Z, Yang Z, Wilkinson S P. Active earth pressure acting on retaining wall considering anisotropic seepage effect. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017, 14( 6): 1202– 1211
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Hu Z, Yang Z, Wilkinson S P. An analysis of passive earth pressure modification due to seepage flow effects. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 55( 5): 666– 679
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Soubra A H, Kastner R, Benmansour A. Passive earth pressures in the presence of hydraulic gradients. Geotechnique, 1999, 49( 3): 319– 330
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Barros P L A, Santos P J. Coefficients of active earth pressure with seepage effect. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2012, 49( 6): 651– 658
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Santos P J, Barros P L A. Active earth pressure due to soil mass partially subjected to water seepage. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52( 11): 1886– 1891
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Abramowitz M, Stegun I A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover, 1972
[29]
Drucker D, Prager W, Greenberg H. Extended limit design theorems for continuous media. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1952, 9( 4): 381– 389
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Qin C, Chian S C. Bearing capacity analysis of a saturated non-uniform soil slope with discretisation-based kinematic analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 96 : 246– 257
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Du D, Dias D, Yang X. Analysis of earth pressure for shallow square tunnels in anisotropic and non-homogeneous soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 104 : 226– 236
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Michalowski R L. Slope stability analysis: A kinematical approach. Geotechnique, 1995, 45( 2): 283– 293
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Michalowski R L. Stability of uniformly reinforced slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123( 6): 546– 556
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Yang X L, Yin J H. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130( 3): 267– 273
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Ghosh S, Sharma R P. Pseudo-dynamic active response of non-vertical retaining wall supporting c−Φ backfill. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28( 5): 633– 641
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Wang J J, Chai H J, Zhu J G, Zhao C. Static and seismic passive resistance in saturated backfill. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction. Kunming: Taylor & Francis Group, 2007, 1411– 1415
[37]
Ahmad S M. Pseudodynamic approach for computation of seismic passive earth resistance including seepage. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 63 : 63– 71
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Henkel D J. The relationship between the strength, pore-water pressure and volume change characteristics of saturated clays. Geotechnique, 1959, 9( 3): 119– 135
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Choudhury D, Singh S. New approach for estimation of static and seismic active earth pressure. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24( 1): 117– 127
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Subba Rao K S, Choudhury D. Seismic passive earth pressures in soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131( 1): 131– 135
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Ghosh S, Sharma R P. Seismic active earth pressure on the back of battered retaining wall supporting inclined backfill. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2012, 12( 1): 54– 63
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Taylor D W. Fundamentals of Soils Mechanics. London: Chapman and Hall, 1948
[43]
Rafiezadeh K, Ataie-Ashtiani B. Transient free-surface seepage in three-dimensional general anisotropic media by BEM. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2014, 46 : 51– 66
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press 2021.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(21266 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/