Effect of different high viscosity modifiers on rheological properties of high viscosity asphalt

Abstract

High viscosity asphalt (HVA) has been a great success as a drainage pavement material. However, the larger porosity of drainage asphalt mixtures weakens the cohesion and adhesion and leads to premature rutting, water damage, spalling and cracking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rheological properties of HVA prepared using different high viscosity modifiers through conventional tests, Brookfield viscosity tests, dynamic shear rheometer tests and bending beam rheometer tests. The conventional performance results demonstrated SBS + rubber asphalt (SRA-1/2) exhibited excellent elastic recovery and low-temperature flexibility. The 60°C dynamic viscosity results indicated TPS + rubber asphalt (TRA) had the excellent adhesion. The rotational viscosity results and rheological results indicated that SRA-2 not only exhibited excellent temperature stability and workability, as well as excellent resistance to deformation and rutting resistance, but also exhibited excellent low-temperature cracking resistance and relaxation performance. Based on rheological results, the PG classification of HVA was 16% rubber + asphalt for PG76-22, 20% rubber + asphalt for PG88-22, TRA and SRA-1/2 for PG88-28. From comprehensive evaluation of the viscosity, temperature stability and sensitivity, as well as high/low temperature performance of HVA, SRA-2 was found to be more suited to the requirements of drainage asphalt pavement materials.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

high viscosity asphalt / rheological properties / rubber / modifier / viscosity

References

[1] Chen J, Tang T, Zhang Y. Laboratory characterization of directional dependence of permeability for porous asphalt mixtures. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50( 5): 215–

[2] Ghavami M S M, Hosseini M S, Zavattieri P D, Haddock J E. Flexible pavement drainage system effectiveness. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 218 : 99– 107

[3] Król J B, Khan R, Collop A C. The study of the effect of internal structure on permeability of porous asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2018, 19( 4): 935– 951

[4] Alvarez A E, Martin A E, Estakhri C. A review of mix design and evaluation research for permeable friction course mixtures. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25( 3): 1159– 1166

[5] Gupta A, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Castro-Fresno D. Incorporation of additives and fibers in porous asphalt mixtures: A review. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12( 19): 3156–

[6] Jing R, Varveri A, Liu X, Scarpas A, Erkens S. Laboratory and field aging effect on bitumen chemistry and rheology in porous asphalt mixture. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673( 3): 365– 374

[7] Liu Q, Cao D. Research on material composition and performance of porous asphalt pavement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2009, 21( 4): 135– 140

[8] Ma X, Li Q, Cui Y C, Ni A Q. Performance of porous asphalt mixture with various additives. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 19( 4): 355– 361

[9] Xu B, Li M, Liu S, Fang J, Ding R, Cao D. Performance analysis of different type preventive maintenance materials for porous asphalt based on high viscosity modified asphalt. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 191: 320– 329

[10] Cong L, Wang T, Tan L, Yuan J, Shi J. Laboratory evaluation on performance of porous polyurethane mixtures and OGFC. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 169 : 436– 442

[11] Hansen K R, McGennis R B, Prowell B, Stonex A. Current and future uses of non-bituminous components of bituminous paving mixtures. Transportation in the New Millennium, 2000

[12] Ho C H, Shan J, Wang F, Chen Y, Almonnieay A. Performance of fiber-reinforced polymer-modified asphalt: Two-year review in northern Arizona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016, 2575( 1): 138– 149

[13] Lu Q, Harvey J T. Laboratory evaluation of open-graded asphalt mixes with small aggregates and various binders and additives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2209( 1): 61– 69

[14] Chen Y, Tan Y, Chen K. Effect of TPS modifier on the properties of high-viscosity asphalt. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012, 44( 06): 82– 85

[15] Afonso M L, Dinis-Almeida M, Fael C S. Study of the porous asphalt performance with cellulosic fibres. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 135 : 104– 111

[16] Li W, Mai Y, Lu Y, Li H, Hong Y. Development of high viscosity asphalt modifier HVM-700. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2010, 37( 9): 1– 2

[17] Li Z. Preparation and research of high-viscosity modified asphalt. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2019

[18] Tanzadeh J, Shahrezagamasaei R. Laboratory assessment of hybrid fiber and nano-silica on reinforced porous asphalt mixtures. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 144 : 260– 270

[19] Imaninasab R, Bakhshi B, Shirini B. Rutting performance of rubberized porous asphalt using Finite Element Method (FEM). Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 106 : 382– 391

[20] Zhang F, Hu C, Zhuang W. The research for low-temperature rheological properties and structural characteristics of high-viscosity modified asphalt. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2018, 131( 2): 1025– 1034

[21] Molenaar A A A, Hagos E T, van de Ven M F C. Effects of aging on the mechanical characteristics of bituminous binders in PAC. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22( 8): 779– 787

[22] Yourong T, Zhang H, Cao D, Xia L, Du R, Shi Z, Dong R, Wang X. Study on cohesion and adhesion of high-viscosity modified asphalt. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2019, 8( 4): 394– 402

[23] Zhong L, Zhang Y, Wang T, Ji Y, Norris P, Pan W P. Optimized methods for preparing activated carbon from rock asphalt using orthogonal experimental design. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2019, 136( 5): 1989– 1999

[24] Li L, Geng H, Sun Y. Simplified viscosity evaluating method of high viscosity asphalt binders. Materials and Structures, 2015, 48( 7): 2147– 2156

[25] Rasmussen R O, Lytton R L, Chang G K. Method to predict temperature susceptibility of an asphalt binder. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14( 3): 246– 252

[26] Zhao S. Study on application of new TPS in drainage asphalt pavement. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2017

[27] Mohd Hasan M R, You Z, Yang X, Heiden P A. Quantification of physicochemical properties, activation energy, and temperature susceptibility of foamed asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 153 : 557– 568

[28] Zhang L, Liu Q, Wu S, Rao Y, Sun Y, Xie J, Pan P. Investigation of the flow and self-healing properties of UV aged asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 174 : 401– 409

[29] Mirzaiyan D, Ameri M, Amini A, Sabouri M, Norouzi A. Evaluation of the performance and temperature susceptibility of gilsonite- and SBS-modified asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 207 : 679– 692

[30] ASTM . D6373–21a. Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2021

[31] Zhang D, Chen Z, Zhang H, Wei C. Rheological and anti-aging performance of SBS modified asphalt binders with different multi-dimensional nanomaterials. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 188 : 409– 416

[32] Dong Z. Research on the composite applications between stabilized asphalt rubber and technology of hot recycling in plant. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2021.