Integrating storm surge modeling with traffic data analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of hurricane evacuation

Abstract

An integrated storm surge modeling and traffic analysis were conducted in this study to assess the effectiveness of hurricane evacuations through a case study of Hurricane Irma. The Category 5 hurricane in 2017 caused a record evacuation with an estimated 6.8 million people relocating statewide in Florida. The Advanced Circulation (ADCIRC) model was applied to simulate storm tides during the hurricane event. Model validations indicated that simulated pressures, winds, and storm surge compared well with observations. Model simulated storm tides and winds were used to estimate the area affected by Hurricane Irma. Results showed that the storm surge and strong wind mainly affected coastal counties in south-west Florida. Only moderate storm tides (maximum about 2.5 m) and maximum wind speed about 115 mph were shown in both model simulations and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) post-hurricane assessment near the area of hurricane landfall. Storm surges did not rise to the 100-year flood elevation level. The maximum wind was much below the design wind speed of 150–170 mph (Category 5) as defined in Florida Building Code (FBC) for south Florida coastal areas. Compared with the total population of about 2.25 million in the six coastal counties affected by storm surge and Category 1–3 wind, the statewide evacuation of approximately 6.8 million people was found to be an over-evacuation due mainly to the uncertainty of hurricane path, which shifted from south-east to south-west Florida. The uncertainty of hurricane tracks made it difficult to predict the appropriate storm surge inundation zone for evacuation. Traffic data were used to analyze the evacuation traffic patterns. In south-east Florida, evacuation traffic started 4 days before the hurricane’s arrival. However, the hurricane path shifted and eventually landed in south-west Florida, which caused a high level of evacuation traffic in south-west Florida. Over-evacuation caused Evacuation Traffic Index (ETI) to increase to 200% above normal conditions in some sections of highways, which reduced the effectiveness of evacuation. Results from this study show that evacuation efficiency can be improved in the future by more accurate hurricane forecasting, better public awareness of real-time storm surge and wind as well as integrated storm surge and evacuation modeling for quick response to the uncertainty of hurricane forecasting.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

storm surge modeling / traffic / evacuation / Hurricane Irma

References

[1] Ozguven E E, Horner M, Kocatepe A, Marcelin J M, Abdelrazig Y, Sando T, Moses R. Metadata-based needs assessment for emergency transportation operations with a focus on an aging population: A case study in Florida. Transport Reviews, 2016, 36( 3): 383– 412

[2] Yazici M A, Ozbay K. Impact of probabilistic road capacity constraints on the spatial distribution of hurricane evacuation shelter capacities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 2022( 1): 55– 62

[3] Huang W, Hagen S, Bacopoulos P. Hydrodynamic modeling of Hurricane Dennis impact on estuarine salinity variation in Apalachicola Bay. Journal of Coastal Research, 2014, 30( 2): 389– 398

[4] Xu S, Huang W. Integrated hydrodynamic modeling and frequency analysis for predicting 1% storm surge in Pensacola Bay. Journal of Coastal Research, 2008, 52(Special Issue): 233– 240

[5] Xu S, Huang W, Zhang G, Gao F, Li X. Integrating Monte Carlo and hydrodynamic models for estimating extreme water levels by storm-surge in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Natural Hazards, 2014, 71( 1): 703– 721

[6] Ullman D S, Ginis I, Huang W, Nowakowski C, Chen X, Stempel P. Assessing the multiple impacts of extreme hurricanes in southern New England, USA. Geosciences, 2019, 9( 6): 265–

[7] Wang P, Adam J D, Cheng J, Vallee M. Morphological and sedimentological impacts of Hurricane Michael along the northwest Florida coast. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 36( 5): 932– 950

[8] Shen Y, Deng G, Xu Z, Tang J. Effects of sea level rise on storm surge and waves within the Yangtze River Estuary. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2019, 13( 2): 303– 316

[9] Ding Y, Ding T, Rusdin A, Zhang Y, Jia Y. Simulation and prediction of storm surges and waves using a fully integrated process model and a parametric cyclonic wind model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2020, 125( 7): e2019JC015793–

[10] Wang T, Yang Z. The nonlinear response of storm surge to sea-level rise: A modeling approach. Journal of Coastal Research, 2019, 35( 2): 287– 294

[11] Xiao H, Wang D, Medeiros S C, Bilskie M V, Hagen S C, Hall C R. Exploration of the effects of storm surge on the extent of saltwater intrusion into the surficial aquifer in coastal east-central Florida (USA). Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 648 : 1002– 1017

[12] Pan Z, Liu H. Impact of human projects on storm surge in the Yangtze Estuary. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 196 : 106792–

[13] Sun Z, Huang S, Nie H, Jiao J, Huang S, Zhu L, Xu D. Risk analysis of seawall overflowed by storm surge during super typhoon. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 107 : 178– 185

[14] Li L, Yuan S, Amini F, Tang H. Numerical study of combined wave overtopping and storm surge overflow of HPTRM strengthened levee. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 97 : 1– 11

[15] Roca M A, Brown R S, Solo-Gabriele H M. Fecal indicator bacteria levels at beaches in the Florida keys after Hurricane Irma. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2019, 138 : 266– 273

[16] Cangialosi J P, Latto A S, Berg R. Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Irma, 30 August to 12 September 2017. National Hurricane Center. 2018

[17] Bacopoulos P. Extreme low and high waters due to a large and powerful tropical cyclone: Hurricane Irma (2017). Natural Hazards, 2019, 98( 3): 939– 968

[18] Carisio A, Kirk K, Lange R, Miller A. NOAA Water Level and Meteorological Data Report: Hurricane Irma U.S. Department of commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services. 2018

[19] The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Hurricane Irma Emergency Evacuation Report and Recommendations. The Florida Department of Transportation, 2018

[20] Luettich R A, Westerink J J, Scheffner N W. ADCIRC: An Advanced Three-dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves, Coasts, and Estuaries. US Army Corps of Engineers, 1992

[21] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Hurricane Irma in Florida Building Performance Observations, Recommendations, and Technical Guidance. Mitigation Assessment Team Report FEMA P-2023. 2018

[22] National Oceanic, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Hurricane Center. IRMA Graphics Archive: 5-day Forecast Track, Initial Wind Field and Watch/Warning Graphic. 2017 (available at the website of National Hurricane Center)

[23] Florida DBPR. Florida Building Code. 7th ed. 2020

[24] Restoration S O S. What to do During a Category 1 Hurricane. (available at the website of RESTORATIONSOS)

[25] Namilae S, Liu D, Parr S. Multiscale Model for Hurricane Evacuation and Fuel Shortage. Final Report June 2020. US Department of Transportation, 2000

[26] National Hurricane Center (NHC). Hurricane Irma archive: 5-day forecast track. 2017. (available at the website of National Hurricane Center)

[27] Chan J C. The physics of tropical cyclone motion. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 37( 1): 99– 128

[28] Chen Y, Zhang F, Green B W, Yu X. Impacts of ocean cooling and reduced wind drag on Hurricane Katrina (2005) based on numerical simulations. Monthly Weather Review, 2018, 146( 1): 287– 306

[29] Shan K, Yu X. A simple trajectory model for climatological studies of tropical cyclones. Journal of Climate, 2020, 33( 18): 7777– 7786

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by National Science Foundation (Nos. 1832068 and 2101091) and Dr. Kai Yin conducted preliminary ADCIRC modeling study during his visit to FAMU-FSU College of Engineering in 2018 before the NSF grant was awarded.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn.