Axial compression behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete-filled stainless steel tube stub column

Hongyuan TANG, Ruizhong LIU, Xin ZHAO, Rui GUO, Yigang JIA

PDF(11927 KB)
PDF(11927 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 1144-1159. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-021-0762-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Axial compression behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete-filled stainless steel tube stub column

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The mechanical properties of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete-filled stainless steel tube (CFSST) stub columns under axial compression were experimentally studied. A total of 28 specimens (7 groups) were fabricated for the axial compression test to study the influences of length-to-width ratio, CFRP constraint coefficient, and the thickness of stainless steel tube on the axial compression behavior. The specimen failure modes, the stress development of stainless steel tube and CFRP wrap, and the load–strain ratio curves in the loading process were obtained. Meanwhile, the relationship between axial and transverse deformations of each specimen was analyzed through the typical relative load−strain ratio curves. A bearing capacity prediction method was proposed based on the twin-shear strength theory, combining the limit equilibrium state of the CFRP-confined CFSST stub column under axial compression. The prediction method was calibrated by the test data in this study and other literature. The results show that the prediction method is of high accuracy.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CFRP / rectangular CFSST stub column / bearing capacity / limit equilibrium state / twin-shear strength theory

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongyuan TANG, Ruizhong LIU, Xin ZHAO, Rui GUO, Yigang JIA. Axial compression behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete-filled stainless steel tube stub column. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 1144‒1159 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0762-4

References

[1]
Ozbakkaloglu T, Oehlers D J. Manufacture and testing of a novel FRP tube confinement system. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30( 9): 2448– 2459
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Marques S P C, Marques D C D S C, Lins da Silva J, Cavalcante M A A. Model for analysis of short columns of concrete confined by fiber-reinforced polymer. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004, 8( 4): 332– 340
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Jiang T, Teng J G. Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP-confined concrete. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29( 11): 2968– 2986
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Masia M J, Gale T N, Shrive N G. Size effects in axially loaded square-section concrete prisms strengthened using carbon fibre reinforced polymer wrapping. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 31( 1): 1– 13
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Guo Y C, Xiao S H, Luo J W, Ye Y Y, Zeng J J. Confined concrete in fiber-reinforced polymer partially wrapped square columns: Axial compressive behavior and strain distributions by a particle image velocimetry sensing technique. Sensors (Basel), 2018, 18( 12): 4118–
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Wang Y F, Wu H L. Size effect of concrete short columns confined with aramid FRP jackets. Engineering Structures, 2011, 15( 4): 535– 544
[7]
Ozbakkaloglu T. Behavior of square and rectangular ultra high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes under axial compression. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2013, 54 : 97– 111
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Yang J L, Lu S W, Wang J Z, Wang Z. Behavior of CFRP partially wrapped square seawater sea-sand concrete columns under axial compression. Engineering Structures, 2020, 222 : 111119–
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Tao Z, Han L H, Zhuang J P. Using CFRP to strengthen concrete-filled steel tubular columns: Stub column tests. In: Fourth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures. Shanghai: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2005, 701–706
[10]
Tao Z, Han L H, Zhuang J P. Axial loading behavior of CFRP strengthened concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2007, 10( 1): 37– 46
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Wang Y, Cai G, Larbi A S, Waldmann D, Tsavdaridis K D, Ran J. Monotonic axial compressive behaviour and confinement mechanism of square CFRP-steel tube confined concrete. Engineering Structures, 2020, 217 : 110802–
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Dong J F, Wang Q Y, Guan Z W. Structural behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete filled steel tube columns strengthened by CFRP. Engineering Structures, 2013, 48 : 532– 542
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Sundarraja M C, Prabhu G G. Experimental study on CFST members strengthened by CFRP composites under compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 72 : 75– 83
[14]
Zhou F, Fang C, Chen Y S. Experimental and numerical studies on stainless steel tubular members under axial cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 2018, 171 : 72– 85
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Fang C, Zhou F, Luo C H. Cold-formed stainless steel RHSs/SHSs under combined compression and cyclic bending. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 141 : 9– 22
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Young B, Ellobody E. Experimental investigation of concrete-filled cold-formed high strength stainless steel tube columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2006, 62( 5): 484– 492
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Uy B, Tao Z, Han L H. Behaviour of short and slender concrete-filled stainless steel tubular columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67( 3): 360– 378
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Ibañez C, Hernandez-Figueirido D, Piquer A. Shape effect on axially loaded high strength CFST stub columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 147 : 247– 256
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Tang H Y, Chen J L, Fan L Y, Sun X J, Peng C M. Experimental investigation of FRP-confined concrete-filled stainless steel tube stub columns under axial compression. Thin-walled Structures, 2020, 146 : 106483–
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
GB/T228.1–2010. Tensile Testing of Metallic Materials Part 1: Room Temperature Test Method. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, 2010 (in Chinese)
[21]
GB/T50080–2016. Standard for Performance Test Method of Ordinary Concrete Mixture. China Construction Industry Press: Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2016 (in Chinese)
[22]
Tang H Y, Deng X Z, Lin Z B, Zhou X. Analytical and experimental investigation on bond behavior of CFRP-to-stainless steel interface. Composite Structures, 2019, 212 : 94– 105
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Erfan A M, Ahmed H H, Mina B A, El-Sayed T A. Structural performance of eccentric ferrocement RC columns. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, 2019, 11 : 1– 13
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
CECS 159: 2004. Technical Specification for Structures with Concrete-filled Rectangular Steel Tube Members. China planning Press: China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization, 2004
[25]
ACI 318. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary. Detroit: American Concrete Institute, 2005
[26]
Yu M H. Unified Strength theory and Its Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Press, 2004
[27]
Mander J A B, Priestley M J N, Park R. Theoretical stress−strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114( 8): 1804– 1826
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhong S T. Concrete Filled Steel Tube Structures. 3rd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2003 (in Chinese)
[29]
Shanmugam N E, Lakshmi B. State of the art report on steel-concrete composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2001, 57( 10): 1041– 1080
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Ge H B, Usami T. Strength analysis of concrete filled thin-walled steel box columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1994, 30( 3): 259– 281
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Long Y L, Cai J. Stress–strain relationship of concrete confined by rectangular steel tubes with binding bars. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 88 : 1– 14
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Wu H P, Cao W L, Dong H Y. Axial compressive strength calculation based on the ‘unified theory’ for special-shaped CFT columns with multiple cavities. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36( 8): 114– 121
[33]
Sakino K, Nakahara H, Morino S, Nishiyama I. Behavior of centrally loaded concrete-filled steel-tube short columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130( 2): 180– 188
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wei J, Zhao J H, Liu Y D, Tian H W. Analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tubular axial compression short columns. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2008, 25( 3): 81– 86
[35]
Lam D, Gardner L. Structural design of stainless steel concrete filled columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2008, 64( 11): 1275– 1282
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Dai P, Yang L, Wang J. Experimental study on bearing behavior of concrete-filled square stainless steel tube stub columns under axial. Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42( 6): 182– 189

Acknowledgements

This study was generously funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51268044). The first author also appreciates the support from the University of Pittsburgh and North Dakota State University when he worked as a visiting scholar.

Notations

A c: cross-sectional area of core concrete
A cfst: total cross-sectional area of carbon steel tube and core concrete
A fr: cross-sectional area of CFRP wrap
A s: cross-sectional area of stainless steel tube
B: short side of rectangular steel tube
DI: ductility index
E 0: elastic modulus of stainless steel
E fr: elastic modulus of CFRP sheet
H: specimen height
f ck: vcharacteristic strength of concrete
f cu: standard cubic compressive strength of concrete
f cfst: strength index of concrete in rectangular stainless steel tube under axial compression
f fr: tensile strength of CFRP sheet
L: long side of rectangular steel tube
n: hardening exponent of stainless steel
n f: number of CFRP layers
N: load
N cfr: predicted load-carrying capacity
N cfst: bearing capacity of concrete-filled stainless steel tubular stub columns with rectangular section under axial compression
N cr: calculation value of ultimate bearing capacity of concrete-filled rectangular stainless steel tubular short columns
N p: proportional limit load
N r: residual load capacity of the FRP-confined CFSST after full fracture of CFRP wrap
N u: peak load at failure
t fr: CFRP thickness
t s: wall thickness of stainless steel tube
Δ: axial deformation
Δ 1: axial deformation corresponding to the feature point
Δ u: axial deformation corresponding to ultimate strength
ε 85%: axial strain when the load falls to 85% of the ultimate load
ε: strain of stainless steel
ε a,s: longitudinal strain
ε h,s: transverse strain
ε y: ε 75%/0.75, where ε 75% is the axial strain when the load attains 75% the ultimate load in the pre-peak stage
ε p: corresponding axial strain of proportional limit load
ε r: corresponding axial strain of the lowest point at failure
ε u: corresponding axial strain of the peak load at failure
η fr: improvement of specimen bearing capacity
φ: sectional stability coefficient
ν: lateral-to-axial strain ratio
σ 0.2: 0.2% proof stress of stainless steel
ξ fr: confinement factor of CFRP wrap
ξ s: confinement factor of stainless steel tube
υ: Poisson’s ratio

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press 2021.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(11927 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/