Flexural behavior of ECC hollow beams incorporating different synthetic fibers

Abstract

Twelve ECC beams with three different fiber types, along with four normal concrete beams, were tested in this study to evaluate the influence of cross-sectional hollowing on their flexural performance. The fiber types used were nylon monofilament (NM), low-cost untreated polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and polypropylene (PP). Three different square hole sizes of 60, 80, and 100 mm with cross-sectional hollowing ratios of 0.16, 0.28, and 0.44, respectively, were adopted for each group of beams in addition to a solid beam. All beams were tested under four-point loading using a displacement-controlled testing machine. The test results showed that ECC beams can mostly withstand higher cracking and ultimate loads compared to their corresponding normal concrete versions. The results also showed that both the ductility and toughness of the ECC beams are higher than those of the normal concrete beams and that the ductility values of the hollow beams with a hole size of 60 mm are higher than those of the corresponding solid beams. Moreover, hollow ECC beams with hole sizes of 60 and 80 mm exhibited a higher ductility than a solid normal concrete beam.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

hollow beam / hollowing ratio / ECC / flexural strength / ductility / toughness

References

[1] Michael D L, Victor C L. Large-scale processing of engineered cementitious composites. ACI Materials Journal, 2008, 105: 358–366

[2] Wang S. Micromechanics based ECC matrix design. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Anna Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 2005

[3] Wang Y, Backer S, Li V C. An experimental study of synthetic fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Journal of Materials Science, 1987, 22(12): 4281–4291

[4] Li V C. Tailoring ECC for special attributes: A review. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2012, 6(3): 135–144

[5] Kanda T, Li V C. Practical design criteria for saturated pseudo strain hardening behavior in ECC. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2006, 4(1): 59–72

[6] Li V C, Wang S, Wu C. Tensile strain-hardening behavior of PVA-ECC. ACI Materials Journal, 2001, 98: 483–492

[7] Li V C, Wu C, Wang S, Ogawa A, Saito T. Interface tailoring for strain-hardening PVA-ECC. ACI Materials Journal, 2002, 99: 463–472

[8] Said S H, Razak H A, Othman I. Flexural behavior of engineered cementitious composite (ECC) slabs with polyvinyl alcohol fibers. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 75: 176–188

[9] Mohammed B S, Aswin M, Beatty W H, Hafiz M. Longitudinal shear resistance of PVA-ECC composite slabs. Structures, 2016, 5: 247–257

[10] Algburi A H M, Sheikh M N, Hadi M N S. Mechanical properties of steel, glass, and hybrid fiber reinforced reactive powder concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 998–1006

[11] Zhang Q, Li V C. Development of durable spray applied fire-resistive Engineered Cementitious Composites (SFR-ECC). Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 60: 10–16

[12] Hung C C, Chen Y S. Innovative ECC jacketing for retrofitting shear-deficient RC members. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 111: 408–418

[13] Ge W J, Ashour A F, Ji X, Cai C, Cao D F. Flexural behavior of ECC-concrete composite beams reinforced with steel bars. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 159: 175–188

[14] Qiao Z, Pan Z, Xue W, Meng S. Experimental study on flexural behavior of ECC/RC composite beams with U-shaped ECC permanent formwork. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(5): 1271–1287

[15] Kanda T, Watanabe S, Li V C. Application of pseudo strain hardening cementitious composites to shear resistant structural elements. In: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures Proceedings FRAMCOS-3, D-79104. Freiburg: IA-FraMCoS, 1998, 1477–1490

[16] Qudah S, Maalej M. Application of engineered cementitious composites (ECC) in interior beam–column connections for enhanced seismic resistance. Engineering Structures, 2014, 69: 235–245

[17] Abid S R, Hilo A N, Daek Y H. Experimental tests on the underwater abrasion of engineered cementitious composites. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 171: 779–792

[18] Abid S R, Shamkhi M S, Mahdi N S, Daek Y H. Hydro-abrasive resistance of engineered cementitious composites with PP and PVA fibers. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 187: 168–177

[19] Ferdous W, Manalo A, Aravinthan T, Fam A. Flexural and shear behaviour of layered sandwich beams. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 173: 429–442

[20] Ferdous W, Almutairi A D, Huang Y, Bai Y. Short-term flexural behaviour of concrete filled pultruded GFRP cellular and tubular sections with pin-eye connections for modular retaining wall construction. Composite Structures, 2018, 206: 1–10

[21] Ferdous W, Bai Y, Ngo T D, Manalo A, Mendis P. New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings—A state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures, 2019, 183: 883–893

[22] Alnuaimi A S, Al-Jabri K S, Hago A. Comparison between solid and hollow reinforced concrete beams. Materials and Structures, 2008, 41(2): 269–286

[23] Lopes S M R, Bernardo L F A. Cracking and failure mode in HSC hollow beams under torsion. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 51: 163–178

[24] Al.Khuzaie H M A, Atea R S. Investigation of torsional behavior and capacity of reactive powder concrete (RPC) of hollow T-beam. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019, 8(1): 199–207

[25] Murugesan A, Narayanan A. Deflection of reinforced concrete beams with longitudinal circular hole. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2018, 23(1): 04017034

[26] Abbass A, Abid S, Özakça M. Experimental investigation on the effect of steel fibers on the flexural behavior and ductility of high-strength concrete hollow beams. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019: 1–13

[27] Abbass A A, Abid S R, Arna’ot F H, Al-Ameri R A, Özakça M. Flexural response of hollow high strength concrete beams considering different size reductions. Structures, 2020, 23: 69–86

[28] Lepech M D, Li V C. Large-Scale processing of engineered cementitious composites. ACI Materials Journal, 2008, 105: 358–366

[29] Zhang R, Matsumoto K, Hirata T, Ishizeki Y, Niwa J. Application of PP-ECC in beam–column joint connections of rigid-framed railway bridges to reduce transverse reinforcements. Engineering Structures, 2015, 86: 146–156

[30] Li V. Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC). Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook. CRC Press, 2008, 1584

[31] Johnston C D. Significance of tests and properties of concrete. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1994, 169C: 547–561

[32] Zahiri F, Eskandari-Naddaf H. Optimizing the compressive strength of concrete containing micro-silica, nano-silica, and polypropylene fibers using extreme vertices mixture design. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 821–830

[33] International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). MC2010. Model Code 2010, Final Draft. Lausanne: fib, 2012, 65–66

[34] Lepech M, Li V C. Design and field demonstration of ECC link slabs for jointless bridge decks. In: Proceedings of CONMAT-5. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 2005, 1–10

[35] Krolicki J, Maffei J, Calvi G M. Shear strength of reinforced concrete walls subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 15(sup1): 30–71

[36] Campione G, Letizia Mangiavillano M. Fibrous reinforced concrete beams in flexure: Experimental investigation, analytical modelling and design considerations. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(11): 2970–2980

[37] Qi J, Wang J, Ma Z J. Flexural response of high-strength steel-ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete beams based on a mesoscale constitutive model: Experiment and theory. Structural Concrete, 2018, 19(3): 719–734

[38] Park R. Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo, Japan, IAEE, 1988, 605–616

[39] Pam H J, Kwan A K H, Islam M S. Flexural strength and ductility of reinforced normal and high-strength concrete beams. Structures and Buildings, 2001, 146(4): 381–389

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press