Ranking of design scenarios of TMD for seismically excited structures using TOPSIS

Abstract

In this paper, design scenarios of a tuned mass damper (TMD) for seismically excited structures are ranked. Accordingly, 10 design scenarios in two cases, namely unconstrained and constrained for the maximum TMD, are considered in this study. A free search of the TMD parameters is performed using a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimum tuning of TMD parameters. Furthermore, nine criteria are adopted with respect to functional, operational, and economic views. A technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is utilized for ranking the adopted design scenarios of TMD. Numerical studies are conducted on a 10-story building equipped with TMD. Simulation results indicate that the minimization of the maximum story displacement is the optimum design scenario of TMD for the seismic-excited structure in the unconstrained case for the maximum TMD stroke. Furthermore, H₂ of the displacement vector of the structure exhibited optimum ranking among the adopted design scenarios in the constrained case for the maximum TMD stroke. The findings of this study can be useful and important in the optimum design of TMD parameters with respect to functional, operational, and economic perspectives.

Keywords

seismic-excited building / TMD / optimum design / PSO / design scenario / TOPSIS

References

[1] Den Hartog J P. Mechanical Vibrations. New York: Courier Corporation, 1985

[2] Thompson A G. Optimum tuning and damping of a dynamic vibration absorber applied to a force excited and damped primary system. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1981, 77(3): 403–415

[3] Warburton G B. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1982, 10(3): 381–401

[4] Bakre S V, Jangid R S. Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2007, 14(3): 448–470

[5] Leung A Y T, Zhang H. Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(3): 715–728

[6] Salvi J, Rizzi E. A numerical approach towards best tuning of Tuned Mass Dampers. In: The 25th International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering. Leuven, 2010, 17–19: 2419–2434

[7] Etedali S, Mollayi N. Cuckoo search-based least squares support vector machine models for optimum tuning of tuned mass dampers. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2018, 18(2): 1850028

[8] Narmashiri K, Hosseini-Tabatabai S M T. An energy dissipation device for earthquake/wind resistant buildings. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013

[9] Giuliano F. Note on the paper “Optimum parameters of tuned liquid column-gas damper for mitigation of seismic-induced vibrations of offshore jacket platforms” by Seyed Amin Mousavi, Khosrow Bargi, and Seyed Mehdi Zahrai. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2013, 20(5): 852

[10] Farshidianfar A, Soheili S. Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 51: 14–22

[11] Kaveh A, Mohammadi S, Hosseini O K, Keyhani A, Kalatjari V R. Optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications using charged system search. Civil Engineering (Shiraz), 2015, 39(C1): 21–40

[12] Zhang H Y, Zhang L J. Tuned mass damper system of high-rise intake towers optimized by improved harmony search algorithm. Engineering Structures, 2017, 138: 270–282

[13] Nigdeli S M, Bekdaş G, Yang X S. Optimum tuning of mass dampers by using a hybrid method using harmony search and flower pollination algorithm. In: International Conference on Harmony Search Algorithm. Singapore: Springer, 2017, 222–231

[14] Bekdaş G, Nigdeli S M, Yang X S. A novel bat algorithm based optimum tuning of mass dampers for improving the seismic safety of structures. Engineering Structures, 2018, 159: 89–98

[15] Yucel M, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli S M, Sevgen S. Estimation of optimum tuned mass damper parameters via machine learning. Journal of Building Engineering, 2019, 26: 100847

[16] Nigdeli S M, Bekdas G. Optimum tuned mass damper approaches for adjacent structures. Earthquakes and Structures, 2014, 7(6): 1071–1091

[17] Nigdeli S M, Bekdas G. Optimum design of multiple positioned tuned mass dampers for structures constrained with axial force capacity. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2019, 28(5): e1593

[18] Lu Z, Li K, Ouyang Y, Shan J. Performance-based optimal design of tuned impact damper for seismically excited nonlinear building. Engineering Structures, 2018, 160: 314–327

[19] Bekdaş G, Nigdeli S M. Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 92: 443–461

[20] Jabary R N, Madabhushi S P G. Structure-soil-structure interaction effects on structures retrofitted with tuned mass dampers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 100: 301–315

[21] Etedali S, Seifi M, Akbari M. A numerical study on optimal FTMD parameters considering soil-structure interaction effects. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2018, 16(5): 527–538

[22] Salvi J, Pioldi F, Rizzi E. Optimum tuned mass dampers under seismic soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 114: 576–597

[23] Shahi M, Sohrabi M R, Etedali S. Seismic control of high-rise buildings equipped with ATMD including soil-structure interaction effects. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2018, 12(3): 1850010

[24] Nazarimofrad E, Zahrai S M. Fuzzy control of asymmetric plan buildings with active tuned mass damper considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 115: 838–852

[25] Etedali S, Akbari M, Seifi M. MOCS-based optimum design of TMD and FTMD for tall buildings under near-field earthquakes including SSI effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 119: 36–50

[26] Etedali S. A new modified independent modal space control approach toward control of seismic-excited structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15(10): 4215–4243

[27] Etedali S, Rakhshani H. Optimum design of tuned mass dampers using multi-objective cuckoo search for buildings under seismic excitations. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2018, 57(4): 3205–3218

[28] Sadek F, Mohraz B, Taylor A W, Chung R M. A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26(6): 617–635

[29] Hadi M N, Arfiadi Y. Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 124(11): 1272–1280

[30] Lee C L, Chen Y T, Chung L L, Wang Y P. Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(1): 43–53

[31] Nigdeli S M, Bekdaş G. Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 21(3): 912–922

[32] Bekdaş G, Kayabekir A E, Nigdeli S M, Toklu Y C. Transfer function amplitude minimization for structures with tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116: 552–562

[33] Heidari A H, Etedali S, Javaheri-Tafti M R. A hybrid LQR-PID control design for seismic control of buildings equipped with ATMD. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 44–57

[34] Zavadskas E K, Suūinskas S, Daniūnas A, Turskis Z, Sivilevičius H. Multiple criteria selection of pile-column construction technology. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2012, 18(6): 834–842

[35] Caterino N, Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 12(4): 555–583

[36] Caterino N, Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2009, 24(6): 432–445

[37] Billah A M, Alam M S. Performance-based prioritisation for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge bent. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014, 10(8): 929–949

[38] Formisano A, Mazzolani F M. On the selection by MCDM methods of the optimal system for seismic retrofitting and vertical addition of existing buildings. Computers & Structures, 2015, 159: 1–13

[39] Terracciano G, Di Lorenzo G, Formisano A, Landolfo R. Cold-formed thin-walled steel structures as vertical addition and energetic retrofitting systems of existing masonry buildings. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2015, 19(7): 850–866

[40] Kennedy J. Particle swarm optimization. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. New York: Springer, 2010, 760–766

[41] Shi Y. Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Seoul, 2001, 1: 81–86

[42] Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE, 1998, 69–73

[43] Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. New York: Springer, 2012

[44] Sianaki O A. Intelligent decision support system for energy management in demand response programs and residential and industrial sectors of the smart grid. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Perth: Curtin University, 2015

[45] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379–423

[46] Behzadian M, Khanmohammadi Otaghsara S, Yazdani M, Ignatius J. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(17): 13051–13069

[47] FEMA P-695. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009

[48] Keshtegar B, Etedali S. Nonlinear mathematical modeling and optimum design of tuned mass dampers using adaptive dynamic harmony search algorithm. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2018, 25(7): e2163

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press