State-of-the-art on resistance of bearing-type bolted connections in high strength steel

Abstract

With the recent development of material science, high strength steel (HSS) has become a practical solution for landmark buildings and major projects. The current codes for design of bearing-type bolted connections of steel constructions were established based on the research of conventional steels. Since the mechanical properties of HSS are different from those of conventional steels, more works should be done to develop the appropriate approach for the design of bearing-type bolted connections in HSS. A review of the research carried out on bearing-type bolted connections fabricated from conventional steel and HSS is presented. The up-to-date tests conducted at Tongji University on four connection types fabricated from three grades of HSS with nominal yield strengths of 550, 690, and 890 MPa are presented. The previous research on failure modes, bearing resistance and the design with consideration of bolt hole elongation are summarized. It is found that the behavior of bolted connections in HSS have no drastic difference compared to that of conventional steel connections. Although the ductility is reduced, plastic deformation capacity of HSS is sufficient to ensure the load redistribution between different bolts with normal construction tolerances. It is also found that behavior of each bolt of multi-bolt connections arranged in perpendicular to load direction is almost identical to that of a single-bolt connection with the same end distance. For connections with bolts arranged in parallel to load direction, the deformation capacity of the whole connection depends on the minimum value between the end distance and the spacing distances in load direction. The comparison with existing design codes shows that Eurocode3 and Chinese GB50017-2017 are conservative for the design of bolted connections in HSS while AISC 360-16 may overestimate the bearing resistance of bolted connections.

Keywords

High strength steel / bolted connection / bearing behavior / design codes

References

[1] Hai L T, Li G Q, Wang Y B, Sun F F, Jin H J. Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of Q690D high strength steel H-section beam-columns about strong axis. Engineering Structures, 2019, 189: 157–173

[2] Li G Q, Wang Y B, Chen S W. The art of application of high-strength steel structures for buildings in seismic zones. Advanced Steel Construction, 2015, 11(4): 492–506

[3] Wang Y B, Li G Q, Chen S W, Sun F F. Experimental and numerical study on the behavior of axially compressed high strength steel columns with H-section. Engineering Structures, 2012, 43: 149–159

[4] Willms R. High Strength Steel for Steel Constructions. Malmo: Nordic Steel Construction Conference-NSCC, 2009

[5] Frank K H, Yura J A. An Experimental Study of Bolted Shear Connections. Report No. FHWA-RD-81–148. 1981

[6] Snijder H H, Ungermann D, Stark J W B, Sedlacek G, Bijlaard F S K, Hemmert-Halswick A. Evaluation of test results on bolted connections in order to obtain strength functions and suitable model factors Part A: Results. Eurocode 3, Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: TNO, 1988

[7] Snijder H H, Ungermann D, Stark J W B, Sedlacek G, Bijlaard F S K, Hemmert-Halswick A. Evaluation of test results on bolted connections in order to obtain strength functions and suitable model factors Part B: Evaluations. Eurocode 3, Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: TNO, 1988

[8] Snijder H H, Ungermann D, Stark J W B, Sedlacek G, Bijlaard F S K, Hemmert-Halswick A. Evaluation of test results on bolted connections in order to obtain strength functions and suitable model factors Part C: Test data. Eurocode 3, Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: TNO, 1988

[9] Owens G W, Dowling P J, Algar R J. Bolted Connections, Bearing Stresses in Connections using Grade 8.8 Bolts. CESLIC Report BC3. 1976

[10] Owens G W, Kridge G J. Bolted Connections, Bearing Stresses in Connections using Grade 8.8 Bolts in Punched Holes. CESLIC Report BC5. 1980

[11] Owens G W, Hargreaves A C. Bolted Connections, Bearing Stresses in Connections using Grade 8.8 Bolts-Stage 2. CESLIC Report BC6. 1980

[12] Kim H J, Yura J A. The effect of ultimate-to-yield ratio on the bearing strength of bolted connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1999, 49(3): 255–269

[13] Puthli R, Fleischer O. Investigations on bolted connections for high strength steel members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2001, 57(3): 313–326

[14] Aalberg A, Larsen P K. Bearing strength of bolted connections in high strength steel. In: Nordic steel construction conference 2001-NSCC 2001: Proceedings. Helsinki: NSCC, 2001, 859–866

[15] Aalberg A, Larsen P K. The effect of steel strength and ductility on bearing failure of bolted connections. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Steel Structures. Coimbra, 2002, 869–878

[16] Rex C O, Easterling W S. Behavior and modeling of a bolt bearing on a single plate. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 792–800

[17] Može P, Beg D. High strength steel tension splices with one or two bolts. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(8–9): 1000–1010

[18] Može P, Beg D. Investigation of high strength steel connections with several bolts in double shear. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(3): 333–347

[19] Može P, Beg D. A complete study of bearing stress in single bolt connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 95: 126–140

[20] Može P. Bearing strength at bolt holes in connections with large end distance and bolt pitch. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 147: 132–144

[21] Draganić H, Dokšanović T, Markulak D. Investigation of bearing failure in steel single bolt lap connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 98: 59–72

[22] Guo H C, Huang Y H, Liu Y H, Liang G. Experimental study on bearing capacity of Q460 high-strength steel bolted connections.China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51: 81–89 (in Chinese)

[23] Shi Y J, Bin P, Gang S, Wang Y H. Experimental study on high strength steel-plate bolted connections under shear force. Industrial Construction, 2012, 42: 56–61 (in Chinese)

[24] Liu Suli, Chen C X, Wei W H, Zhang H. Experimental research on the mechanical properties of high strength bolts with bearing type. Anhui architecture, 2013, 2: 211–212 (in Chinese)

[25] Wu Y H, Zhang Z Y, Ji H G. Experimental study on the bearing strength of hole wall of high strength bolt connections. Steel Construction, 2015, 12: 28–31

[26] EN 1993-1-8. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures-Part 1–8: Design of Joints. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2005

[27] AISC. Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., 2016

[28] GB50017-2017. Code for design of steel structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018 (in Chinese)

[29] Latour M, Rizzano G, D’Antimo M, Demonceau J F, Jaspart J P, Armenante V. Bearing strength of shear connections for tubular structures: An analytical approach. Thin-walled Structures, 2018, 127: 180–199

[30] Teh L H, Uz M E. Effect of loading direction on the bearing capacity of cold-reduced steel sheets. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140(12): 06014005

[31] Teh L H, Uz M E. Ultimate shear-out capacities of structural-steel bolted connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(6): 04014152

[32] Wang Y B, Lyu Y F, Li G Q, Liew J Y R. Behavior of single bolt bearing on high strength steel plate. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 137: 19–30

[33] Lyu Y F, Wang Y B, Li G Q, Jiang J. Numerical analysis on the ultimate bearing resistance of single-bolt connection with high strength steels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 153: 118–129

[34] National Standardization Technical Committees. GB/T 228-2002 Metallic Materials: Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2002 (in Chinese)

[35] Teh L H, Uz M E. Block shear capacity of bolted connections in cold-reduced steel sheets. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138(4): 459–467

[36] Teh L, Deierlein G. Effective shear plane model for tearout and block shear failure of bolted connections. Engineering Journal-American Institute of Steel Construction, 2017, 54(3): 181–194

[37] Teh L H, Uz M E. Block shear failure planes of bolted connections—Direct experimental verifications. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 111: 70–74

[38] Elliott M D, Teh L H. Whitmore tension section and block shear. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(2): 04018250

[39] Elliott M D, Teh L H, Ahmed A. Behaviour and strength of bolted connections failing in shear. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 153: 320–329

[40] Wang Y B, Lyu Y F, Li G Q, Liew J Y R. Bearing-strength of high strength steel plates in two-bolt connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 155: 205–218

[41] Perry W C. Bearing Strength of Bolted Connections. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 1981

[42] Winter G. Tests on bolted connections in light gage steel. Journal of the Structural Division, 1956, 82: ST2

[43] Chang K P, Matlock R B. Light gage steel bolted connections without washers. Journal of the Structural Division, 1975, 181: ST7

[44] de Back J, de Jona A. Measurements on Connections with H.S.F.G. Bolts, Particularly in View of the Permissible Arithmetical Bearing Stress (a condensed version of Reports 6-66-1 by J. H. A. Struik and 6-67-5 by S. Wittermans). Report 6–68–3. 1968

[45] Munse W H. The Effect of Bearing Pressure on the Static Strength of Riveted Connections. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1959

[46] Teh L H, Uz M E. Combined bearing and shear-out capacity of structural steel bolted connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(11): 04016098

[47] D’Antimo M, Demonceau J F, Jaspart J P, Latour M, Rizzano G. Experimental and theoretical analysis of shear bolted connections for tubular structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 138: 264–282

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51408428).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press