Fused structures for safer and more economical constructions

Abstract

Safety margin and construction costs are two conflicting goals for a structure. By providing a fuse in a structure that is triggered at a certain level of over-loading, further increase of loading is prohibited and failure of the structure is changed to a safer mode. As overloading is controlled and a safer failure mode is enforced, a fused structure requires a smaller safety factor thus leading to more economical construction without compromising safety. The use of a fuse will also facilitate safer use of advanced construction materials such as fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. In this case, a fuse can transfer the sudden and dangerous failure mode associated with brittle FRP debonding or rupture to a safe and ductile failure mode at the fuse location. This paper introduces a new type of fused structure as well as an associated design philosophy and approach, in addition to examples of engineering applications.

Keywords

fused structures / structural fuse / fiber-reinforced polymer / concrete

References

[1] Schossig W. Introduction to the history of selective protection. PAC Magazine, 2007, 70–74

[2] Melchers R E. Structural reliability theory in the context of structural safety. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 2007, 24(1): 55–69

[3] Stewart M G, Foster S, Ahammed M, Sirivivatnanon V. Calibration of australian standard AS3600 concrete structures part II: Reliability indices and changes to capacity reduction factors. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 17(4): 254–266

[4] AS/NZS 1170.0 2002. Structural Design Actions-Part 0: General Principles. Standards Australia, Sydney NSW, 2002

[5] Melchers R E, Beck A T. Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2017

[6] Mosley B, Bungey J, Hulse R, Mosley W H. Reinforced Concrete Design to Eurocode 2. 7th Ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012

[7] El-Bahey S, Bruneau M. Buckling restrained braces as structural fuses for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete bridge bents. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(3): 1052–1061

[8] Kauffman A, Memari A M. Performance evaluation of different masonry infill walls with structural fuse elements based on in-plane cyclic load testing. Buildings, 2014, 4(4): 605–634

[9] Li G, Jiang Y, Zhang S Z, Zeng Y, Li Q. Seismic design or retrofit of buildings with metallic structural fuses by the damage-reduction spectrum. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2015, 14(1): 85–96

[10] Shoeibi S, Kafi M A, Gholhaki M. New performance-based seismic design method for structures with structural fuse system. Engineering Structures, 2017, 132: 745–760

[11] Cui S. Integrated design methodology for isolated floor systems in single-degree-of-freedom structural fuse systems. Thesis for the Doctoral Degree. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2012

[12] Vargas R, Bruneau M. Experimental response of buildings designed with metallic structural fuses. II. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(4): 394–403

[13] Burgoyne C, Balafas I. Why is FRP not a financial success? In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conerence on FRP Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures, FRPRCS-8. Patras: University of Patras, 2007

[14] Val D V, Stewart M G. Life-cycle cost analysis of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments. Structural Safety, 2003, 25(4): 343–362

[15] Eamon C D, Jensen E A, Grace N F, Shi X. Life-cycle cost analysis of alternative reinforcement materials for bridge superstructures considering cost and maintenance uncertainties. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2012, 24(4): 373–380

[16] Ilg P, Hoehne C, Guenther E. High-performance materials in infrastructure: A review of applied life cycle costing and its drivers-the case of fiber-reinforced composites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 926–945

[17] Meiarashi S, Nishizaki I, Kishima T. Life-cycle cost of all-composite suspension bridge. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2002, 6(4): 206–214

[18] Grace N F, Jensen E A, Eamon C D, Shi X. Life-cycle cost analysis of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete bridges. ACI Structural Journal, 2012, 109(5): 697–704

[19] Naaman A. FRP reinforcements in structural concrete: Assessment, progress and prospects. In: Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, FRPRCS-6. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003, 3–24

[20] ACI 440.1R–15. Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2015

[21] Paulay T, Priestley M J N. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1992

[22] Wu Y F, Jiang J F, Liu K. Perforated SIFCON blocks—An extraordinarily ductile material ideal for use in compression yielding structural systems. Construction & Building Materials, 2010, 24(12): 2454–2465

[23] Homrich J R, Naaman A E. Stress-strain properties of SIFCON in compression. In: Fiber Reinforced Concrete Properties and Applications, ACI SP-105. Detroit: American Concrete Institute, 1987, 283–304

[24] Wu Y F. Ductility demand of compression yielding fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 2008, 105(1): 104–110

[25] Zhou Y W, Wu Y F, Teng J G, Leung A Y T. Parametric space for the optimal design of compression-yielding FRP-reinforced concrete beams. Materials and Structures, 2010, 43(1–2): 81–97

[26] Zhou Y W, Wu Y F, Teng J G, Leung A Y T. Ductility analysis of compression-yielding FRP-reinforced composite beams. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009, 31(9): 682–691

[27] Wu Y F, Zhou Y W, He X Q. Performance-based optimal design of compression-yielding FRP-reinforced concrete beams. Composite Structures, 2010, 93(1): 113–123

[28] Wu Y F, Zhou Y W. Controlling the damage of concrete columns through compression yielding. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2011, 18(8): 890–907

[29] Nowak A S, Collins K R. Reliability of Structures. McGraw-Hill, 2000

[30] GB50068. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Building Structures. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2001 (in Chinese)

[31] ACI 318-14. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2014

[32] Rubinstein R Y, Kroese D P. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. John Wiley & Sons, 2016

[33] Galambos T V, Ellingwood B, MacGregor J G, Cornell C A. Probability based load criteria: Assessment of current design practice. Journal of the Structural Division, 1982, 108: 959–977

[34] Huang X, Chen J, Zhu H. Assessing small failure probabilities by AK-SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and subset simulation. Structural Safety, 2016, 59: 86–95

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature