Estimating moment capacity of ferrocement members using self-evolving network

Abstract

In this paper, an empirical model based on self-evolving neural network is proposed for predicting the flexural behavior of ferrocement elements. The model is meant to serve as a simple but reliable tool for estimating the moment capacity of ferrocement members. The proposed model is trained and validated using experimental data obtained from the literature. The data consists of information regarding flexural tests on ferrocement specimens which include moment capacity and cross-sectional dimensions of specimens, concrete cube compressive strength, tensile strength and volume fraction of wire mesh. Comparisons of predictions of the proposed models with experimental data indicated that the models are capable of accurately estimating the moment capacity of ferrocement members. The proposed models also make better predictions compared to methods such as the plastic analysis method and the mechanism approach. Further comparisons with other data mining techniques including the back-propagation network, the adaptive spline, and the Kriging regression models indicated that the proposed models are superior in terms prediction accuracy despite being much simpler models. The performance of the proposed models was also found to be comparable to the GEP-based surrogate model.

Keywords

ferrocement / moment capacity / self-evolving neural network

References

[1] Mashrei M A, Abdulrazzaq N, Abdalla T Y, Rahman M S. Neural networks model and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for predicting the moment capacity of ferrocement members. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(6): 1723–1734

[2] Gandomi A H, Roke D A, Sett K. Genetic programming for moment capacity modeling of ferrocement members. Engineering Structures, 2013, 57: 169–176

[3] Mansur M A, Paramasivam P. Cracking behavior and ultimate strength of ferrocement in flexure. Journal of Ferrocement, 1986, 16(4): 405–415

[4] Paramasivam P, Ravindrajah R S. Effect of arrangements of reinforcements on mechanical properties of ferrocement. ACI Structural Journal, 1988, 85(1): 3–11

[5] Naaman A E, Homeric J R. Flexural design of ferrocement computerized evaluation and design aids. Journal of Ferrocement, 1986, 16(2): 101–116

[6] Gaspar B, Teixeira A P, Soares C G. Assessment of the efficiency of kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 37: 24–34

[7] Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (pncs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 59: 80–95

[8] Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535

[9] Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31

[10] Matinez-Garcia F J, Moreno-Perez J A. Jumping Frogs Optimization: A New Swarm Method for Discrete Optimization. Technical Report DEIOC 3/2008, Department of Statistics, O.R. and Computing, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, 2008

[11] Durbin R, Rumelhart R. Product units: A computationally powerful and biologically plausible extension to backpropagation networks. Neural Computation, 1989, 1(1): 133–142

[12] Paramasivam P, Mansur M S, Ong K C. Flexural behavior of light weight ferrocement slabs. Journal of Ferrocement, 1985, 15(1): 25–33

[13] Mansur M A. Ultimate strength design of ferrocement in flexure. Journal of Ferrocement, 1988, 18(4): 385–395

[14] Logan D, Shah S P. Moment capacity and cracking behavior of ferrocement in flexure. ACI J, 1973, 70(12): 799–804

[15] Desayi P, Reddy V. Strength of lightweight ferrocement in flexure. J Cement Concr Composites, 1991, 13: 13–20

[16] Jin Y, Okabe T, Sendhoff B. Neural network regularization and ensembling using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC04), IEEE, 2004

[17] Reed R D, Marks R J. Neural Smithing. The MIT Press, 1999

[18] Goh A T C, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Zhang W, Xiao Y. Evaluating stability of underground entry-type excavations using multivariate adaptive regression splines and logistic regression. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 70: 148–154

[19] Forghani A, Peralta R C. Transport modeling and multivariate adaptive regression splines for evaluating performance of asr systems in freshwater aquifers. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2017, 553: 540–548

[20] Goh A T C. Back-propagation neural networks for modeling complex systems. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1995, 9(3): 143–151

[21] Rahman M S, Wang J, Deng W, Carter J P. A neural network model of the uplift capacity of suction caissons. Computers and Geotechnics, 2001, 28(4): 269–287

[22] Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 68: 70–84

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature