Reliability and variance-based sensitivity analysis of arch dams during construction and reservoir impoundment

Abstract

The static performance of arch dams during construction and reservoir impoundment is assessed taking into account the effects of uncertainties presented in the model properties as well as the loading conditions. Dez arch dam is chosen as the case study; it is modeled along with its rock foundation using the finite element method considering the stage construction. Since previous studies concentrated on simplified models and approaches, comprehensive study of the arch dam model along with efficient and state-of-the-art uncertainty methods are incorporated in this investigation. The reliability method is performed to assess the safety level and the sensitivity analyses for identifying critical input factors and their interaction effects on the response of the dam. Global sensitivity analysis based on improved Latin hypercube sampling is employed in this study to indicate the influence of each random variable and their interaction on variance of the responses. Four levels of model advancement are considered for the dam-foundation system: 1) Monolithic dam without any joint founded on the homogeneous rock foundation, 2) monolithic dam founded on the inhomogeneous foundation including soft rock layers, 3) jointed dam including the peripheral and contraction joints founded on the homogeneous foundation, and 4) jointed dam founded on the inhomogeneous foundation. For each model, proper performance indices are defined through limit-state functions. In this manner, the effects of input parameters in each performance level of the dam are investigated. The outcome of this study is defining the importance of input factors in each stage and model based on the variance of the dam response. Moreover, the results of sampling are computed in order to assess the safety level of the dam in miscellaneous loading and modeling conditions.

Keywords

concrete arch dams / reliability / randomness / improved Latin hypercube sampling / variance-based sensitivity analysis / exceedance probability / Sobol′ index

References

[1] Wieland M, Kirchen G F. Long-term dam safety monitoring of Punt dal Gall arch dam in Switzerland. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 76–83

[2] USBR. Design Criteria for Concrete Arch and Gravity dams. Denver: United States Bureau of Reclamation, 1977

[3] USACE. Earthquake Design and Evaluation of Concrete Hydraulic Structures. Engineer Manual, EM 1110-2-6053. 2007

[4] Luísa M, Farinha B, de Lemos J V, Neves E M. Analysis of foundation sliding of an arch dam considering the hydromechanical behavior. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 35‒43

[5] Bayraktar A, Hancer E, Akkose M. Influence of base-rock characteristics on the stochastic dynamic response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27(10): 1498–1508

[6] Lin G, Du J, Hu Z. Earthquake analysis of arch and gravity dams including the effects of foundation inhomogeneity. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2007, 1(1): 41–50

[7] Mohammadi P M, Noorzad A, Rahimian M, Omidvar B. The effect of interaction between reservoir and multi-layer foundation on the dynamic response of a typical arch dam to P and S waves. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2009, 34: 91–106

[8] Joshi S G, Gupta I D, Murnal P B. Analyzing the effect of foundation inhomogeneity on the seismic response of gravity dams. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 2015, 6: 11–24

[9] Raychowdhury P, Jindal S. Shallow foundation response variability due to soil and model parameter uncertainty. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(3): 237–251

[10] Sheibany F, Ghaemian M. Thermal stress analysis of concrete arch dams due to environmental action. In: Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Heat Transfer. Volume 1. California, 2004

[11] Thoft-Christensen P, Baker M J. Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications. Berlin: Springer, 1982

[12] Altarejos-García L, Escuder-Bueno I, Serrano-Lombillo A, de Membrillera-Ortuño M G. Methodology for estimating the probability of failure by sliding in concrete gravity dams in the context of risk analysis. Structural Safety, 2012, 36 ‒ 37: 1–13

[13] Yang I H. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of time-dependent effects in concrete structures. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(7): 1366–1374

[14] ICOLD. Risk Assessment in Dam Safety Management. Bulletin 130. International Commission on Large Dams, 2005

[15] Bjerager P, Krenk S. Parametric sensitivity in first order reliability theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1989, 115(7): 1577–1582

[16] Ditlevson O, Madsen H O. Structural Reliability Methods. New York: John Wiley, 1996

[17] Hohenbichler M, Rackwitz R. Sensitivity and importance measures in structural reliability. Civil Engineering Systems, 1986, 3(4): 203–209

[18] Karamchandani A, Cornell C A. Sensitivity estimation within first and second order reliability methods. Structural Safety, 1992, 11(2): 95–107

[19] Madsen H O, Krenk S, Lind N C. Methods of Structural Safety. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1986

[20] Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 68: 70–84

[21] Hamdia K M, Silani M, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227

[22] Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 59: 80–95

[23] Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31

[24] Smith M. Influence of uncertainty in the stability analysis of a dam foundation. In: Llanos J A, Yagüe J, Sáenz de Ormijana F, Cabrera M, Penas J, eds. Dam Maintenance and Rehabilitation. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003, 151–158

[25] Hartford N D, Baecher B. Risk and Uncertainty in Dam Safety. London: Thomas Telford Ltd., 2004

[26] Lupoi A, Callari C. The role of probabilistic methods in evaluating the seismic risk of concrete dams. In: Dolšek M, ed. Protection of Built Environment Against Earthquakes. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, 309–329

[27] de Araújo J M, Awruch A M. Probabilistic finite element analysis of concrete gravity dams. Advances in Engineering Software, 1998, 29(2): 97–104

[28] Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M. Seismic assessment of concrete gravity dams using capacity estimation and damage indexes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2013, 42(1): 123–144

[29] Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M. Incremental dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams including base and lift joints. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12(1): 119–134

[30] Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M. Damage assessment of a concrete arch dam through nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 44: 127–137

[31] Alembagheri M, Seyedkazemi M. Seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of gravity dams. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(1): 41–58

[32] Alonso E. Risk analysis of slopes and its application to slopes in Canadian sensitive clays. Geotechnique, 1976, 26(3): 453–472

[33] Tang W H, Yücemen M S, Ang A H S. Probability based short term design of slopes. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1976, 13(3): 201–215

[34] Christian J T, Ladd C C, Baecher G B. Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, 1994, 120(12): 2180–2207

[35] Griffiths D V, Fenton G A. Influence of soil strength spatial variability on the stability of an undrained clay slope by finite elements. In: Proceedings of Geo-Denver 2000. ASCE, 2000, 184–193

[36] Husein Malkawi A I, Hassan W F, Abdulla F A. Uncertainty and reliability analysis applied to slope stability. Structural Safety, 2000, 22(2): 161–187

[37] Griffiths D V, Fenton G A, Manoharan N. Bearing capacity of rough rigid strip footing on cohesive soil: Probabilistic study. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(9): 743–755

[38] Fenton G A, Griffiths D V, Williams M B. Reliability of traditional retaining wall design. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(1): 55–62

[39] Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535

[40] Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 68: 446–464

[41] Iman R L. Latin Hypercube Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008

[42] Rajabi M M, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Janssen H. Efficiency enhancement of optimized Latin hypercube sampling strategies: Application to Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis and meta-modeling. Advances in Water Resources, 2015, 76: 127–139

[43] Helton J C, Davis F J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2003, 81(1): 23–69

[44] Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O. On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety, 2003, 25(1): 47–68

[45] Helton J C, Davis F J, Johnson J D. A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with random and Latin hypercube sampling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005, 89(3): 305–330

[46] Homma T, Saltelli A. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1996, 52(1): 1–7

[47] Archer G E, Saltelli A, Sobol I M. Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of bootstrap. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1997, 58(2): 99–120

[48] Chan K, Saltelli A, Tarantola S. Winding stairs: A sampling tool to compute sensitivity indices. Statistics and Computing, 2000, 10(3): 187–196

[49] Sobol′ I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001, 55(1): 271–280

[50] Oakley J E, O’Hagan A. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: A Bayesian approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology, 2004, 66(3): 751–769

[51] Helton J C, Johnson J D, Sallaberry C J, Storlie C B. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2006, 91(10–11): 1175–1209

[52] Storlie C B, Swiler L P, Helton J C, Sallaberry C J. Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(11): 1735–1763

[53] Saltelli A, Annoni P, Azzini I, Campolongo F, Ratto M, Tarantola S. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Computer Physics Communications, 2010, 181(2): 259–270

[54] Tian W. A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 20: 411–419

[55] Hall J W, Boyce S A, Wang Y, Dawson R J, Tarantola S, Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis for hydraulic models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 135(11): 959–969

[56] Wan H P, Ren W X. Parameter selection in finite-element-model updating by global sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process metamodel. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 141(6): 04014164

[57] Rajabi M M, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Simmons C T. Polynomial chaos expansions for uncertainty propagation and moment independent sensitivity analysis of seawater intrusion simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 520: 101–122

[58] ICOLD. Guidelines for use of numerical models in dam engineering. International Commission on Large Dams. Bulletin 155. Ad-Hoc Committee on Computational Aspects, 2013

[59] Marco C. Crack Models in Concrete Dams. College of Civil Engineering, Channels and Ports, Madrid, 1995

[60] Ghrib F, Lèger P, Tinawi R. Lupien R, Veilleux M.A progressive methodology for seismic safety evaluation of gravity dams: From the preliminary screening to non-linear finite element analysis. International Journal of Hydropower and Dams, 1998, 2: 126–138

[61] Ruggeri G, Pellegrini R, Rubin de Célix M, Bernsten M, Royet P, Bettzieche V, Amberg W, Gustaffsson A, Morison T, Zenz G. Sliding Safety of Existing Gravity Dams—Final Report. ICOLD European Club. Working group on Sliding Safety of Existing Gravity Dams, 2004

[62] Hosseinzadeh A, Nobarinasab M, Soroush A, Lotfi V. Coupled stress-seepage analysis of Karun III concrete arch dam. Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 166(5): 483–501

[63] Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Stoumpos G. Classification of weak rock masses in dam foundation and tunnel excavation. In: Lollino G, Giordan D, Thuro K, Carranza-Torres C, Wu F, Marinos P, Delgado C, eds. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory. Cham: Springer, 2014, 859–863

[64] Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M. Seismic performance evaluation of a jointed arch dam. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2016, 12(2): 256–274

[65] Bernier C, Padgett J E, Proulx J, Paultre P. Seismic fragility of concrete gravity dams with spatial variation of angle of friction: Case study. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 142(5): 05015002

[66] Hoek E.Practical Rock Engineering. On-line Course , 2007

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature