Application of random set method in a deep excavation: based on a case study in Tehran cemented alluvium

Arash SEKHAVATIAN, Asskar Janalizadeh CHOOBBASTI

PDF(1270 KB)
PDF(1270 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 66-80. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-018-0461-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Application of random set method in a deep excavation: based on a case study in Tehran cemented alluvium

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The design of high-rise buildings often necessitates ground excavation, where buildings are in close proximity to the construction, thus there is a potential for damage to these structures. This paper studies an efficient user-friendly framework for dealing with uncertainties in a deep excavation in layers of cemented coarse grained soil located in Tehran, Iran by non-deterministic Random Set (RS) method. In order to enhance the acceptability of the method among engineers, a pertinent code was written in FISH language of FLAC2D software which enables the designers to run all simulations simultaneously, without cumbersome procedure of changing input variables in every individual analysis. This could drastically decrease the computational effort and cost imposed to the project, which is of great importance especially to the owners. The results are presented in terms of probability of occurrence and most likely values of the horizontal displacement at top of the wall at every stage of construction. Moreover, a methodology for assessing the credibility of the uncertainty model is presented using a quality indicator. It was concluded that performing RS analysis before the beginning of every stage could cause great economical savings, while improving the safety of the project.

Keywords

uncertainty / reliability analysis / deep excavations / random set method / finite difference method

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Arash SEKHAVATIAN, Asskar Janalizadeh CHOOBBASTI. Application of random set method in a deep excavation: based on a case study in Tehran cemented alluvium. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 66‒80 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0461-y

References

[1]
Lacasse S, Nadim F. Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties. In: Shackelford C D, Nelson P P, Roth M J S, eds. Proceedings of Conference on Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice (Uncertainty ‘96). American Society of Civil Engineers, 1996, 49–75
[2]
Griffiths D V, Fenton G A. Influence of soil strength spatial variability on the stability of an undrained clay slope by finite elements. Geo-Denver Conf. on Soil Stability, Denver, Colorado, United States, 2000, 184–193
[3]
Fenton G A, Griffiths D V. Bearing capacity of spatially random c–ϕ soils. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Rotterdam, Balkema, 2001, 1411–1415
[4]
Ang A H S, Tang W H. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design: Volume I-Basic Principles. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1975
[5]
Harr M E. Reliability Based Design in Civil Engineering. New York: Dover publications, 1996
[6]
Haldar A, Mahadevan S. Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. New York: Wiley & Sons, 2000
[7]
Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014a, 68: 70–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014b, 59: 80–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Rackwitz R. Reviewing probabilistic soils modeling. Computers and Geotechnics, 2000, 26(3–4): 199–223
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Phoon K, Kulhawy F H. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(4): 612–624
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Duncan J M. Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(4): 307–316
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Lee I K, White W, Ingles O G. Geotechnical Engineering. Boston: Pitman, 1983
[14]
Kulhway F H. On the evaluation of static soil properties. In: Proceedings of a Specialty ASCE Conference on Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments-II, Volume 1. Berkley, California, 1992, 95–115
[15]
Peschl G M, Schweiger H F. Reliability analysis in geotechnics with finite elements – comparison of probabilistic, stochastic and fuzzy set methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (ISIPTA_03). Canada: Carleton Scientific, 2003, 437–451
[16]
Ben-Haim Y, Elishakoff I. Convex Models of Uncertainty in Applied Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990
[17]
Oberguggenberger M, Fellin W. From probability to fuzzy sets: the struggle for meaning in geotechnical risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistics in Geotechnics – Technical and Economical Risk Estimation, Essen: VGE, 2002, 29–38
[18]
Peschl G M. Reliability Analyses in Geotechnics with the Random Set Finite Element Method. Dissertation for PhD degree. Graz University of Technology, 2004
[19]
Dubois D, Prade H. Consonant approximation of belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1990, 4(5–6): 419–449
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Dubois D, Prade H. Random sets and fuzzy interval analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1991, 42(1): 87–101
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Walley P. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991
[22]
Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325–339
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976
[24]
Tonon F, Bernardini A, Mammino A. Determination of parameters range in rock engineering by means of Random Ret Theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2000, 70(3): 241–261
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Dong W, Shah H C. Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1987, 24(1): 65–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Cornell C A. First-order uncertainty analysis of soils deformation and stability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability (ICASP1), 1971, 129–144
[27]
Alonso E E, Krizek R J. Stochastic formulation of soil profiles. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability (ICASP2). Aachen, Germany, 1975, 9–32
[28]
Lumb P. Spatial variability of soil properties. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Application of Statistics and Probability to Soil and Structural Engineering (ICASP). Aachen, Germany, 1975, 397–421
[29]
Vanmarcke E H. Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1977, 103: 1227–1246
[30]
Vanmarcke E H. Random Fields – Analysis and Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press, 1983
[31]
Itasca. FLAC2D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) version 7.0 user’s manual. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Itasca Consulting Group, 2011
[32]
Christian J T, Ladd C C, Baecher G B. Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1994, 120(12): 2180–2207
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Rieben E H. Geological observation on alluvial deposits in northern Iran. Geological Organization of Iran, Report 9, 1966 (in French)
[34]
Duncan J M, Byrne P M, Wong K S, Marby P. Strength, stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analysis of stresses and movements in soil mass. Rep. No. UCB/GT/80-01, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1980
[35]
Seed R B, Duncan J M. SSCOMP: a finite element analysis program for evaluation of soil structure interaction and compaction effects. Report No. UCB/GT/84-02, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1984
[36]
Briaud J L, Lim Y. Tieback walls in sand: numerical simulations and design implications. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(2): 101–110
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Lim Y, Briaud J L. Three dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of tieback walls and of soil nailed walls under piled bridge abutment. Report to the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1996
[38]
Dunlop P, Duncan J M. Development of failure around excavated slopes. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1970, 96: 471–493
[39]
Finno R J, Blackburn J T, Roboski J F. Three dimensional effects for supported excavations in clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(1): 30–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
U.S. EPA. TRIM FaTE Technical Support Document Volume I: Description of Module. EPA/43/D-99/002A, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 1999
[41]
Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 68: 446–464
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Baecher G B. Geotechnical Error Analysis. Special Summer Course 1.60s. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985
[44]
Kulhawy F H, Birgisson B, Grigoriu M D. Reliability based foundation design for transmission line structures: transformation models for in situ tests. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California: Report EL-5507(4), 1992
[45]
Li K S, White W. Reliability index of slopes. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, 1987, (2): 755–762
[46]
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Soil nail walls reference manual. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, 2015
[47]
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Introduction to probability and reliability methods for use in geotechnical engineering. Engineering Technical Letter No. 1110-2-547, 1997
[48]
Long M. Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(3): 203–224
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1270 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/