Shanghai center project excavation induced ground surface movements and deformations

Guolin XU, Jiwen ZHANG, Huang LIU, Changqin REN

PDF(6429 KB)
PDF(6429 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 26-43. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-017-0439-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Shanghai center project excavation induced ground surface movements and deformations

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Empirical data on deep urban excavations can provide designers a significant reference basis for assessing potential deformations of the deep excavations and their impact on adjacent structures. The construction of the Shanghai Center involved excavations in excess of 33-m-deep using the top-down method at a site underlain by thick deposits of marine soft clay. A retaining system was achieved by 50-m-deep diaphragm walls with six levels of struts. During construction, a comprehensive instrumentation program lasting 14 months was conducted to monitor the behaviors of this deep circular excavation. The following main items related to ground surface movements and deformations were collected: (1) walls and circumferential soils lateral movements; (2) peripheral soil deflection in layers and ground settlements; and (3) pit basal heave. The results from the field instrumentation showed that deflections of the site were strictly controlled and had no large movements that might lead to damage to the stability of the foundation pit. The field performance of another 21cylindrical excavations in top-down method were collected to compare with this case through statistical analysis. In addition, numerical analyses were conducted to compare with the observed data. The extensively monitored data are characterized and analyzed in this paper.

Keywords

deep excavation / foundation pit / soft clay / top-down method / field observation / ground surface movements / ground deformations

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guolin XU, Jiwen ZHANG, Huang LIU, Changqin REN. Shanghai center project excavation induced ground surface movements and deformations. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 26‒43 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0439-1

References

[1]
Ou C Y, Liao J T, Lin H D. Performance of diaphragm wall constructed using the top-down method. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(9): 798–808
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Liu G B, Ng C W, Wang Z W. Observed performance of a deep multistrutted excavation in Shanghai soft clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(8): 1004–1013
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Tan Y, Wang D. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. II: top-down construction of the peripheral rectangular pit. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013a, 139(11): 1894–1910
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Whittle A J, Corral G, Jen L C, Rawnsley R P. Predication and performance of deep excavations for Courthouse Station, Boston. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(4): 04014123
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Orazalin Z Y, Whittle A J, Olsen M B. Three-dimensional analysis of excavation support system for the Stata Center Basement on the MIT campus. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(7): 05015001
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Tanner Blackburn J, Finno R J. Three-dimensional responses observed in an internally braced excavation in soft clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1364–1373
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Hashash Y M A, Osouli A, Marulanda C. Central artery/tunnel project excavation induced ground deformations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(9): 1399–1406
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Tan Y, Wang D. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. I: bottom-up construction of the central cylindrical shaft. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013b, 139(11): 1875–1893
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Wong I, Poh T, Chuah H. Performance of excavations for depresses expressway in Singapore. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(7): 617–625
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hsieh P G, Ou C Y. Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(6): 1004–1017
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Long M. Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(3): 203–224
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Moormann C. Analysis of wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in soft soil based on a new worldwide database. Soil and Foundation, 2004, 44(1): 87–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
O’Rourke T D, McGinn A J. Lessons learned for ground movements and soil stabilization from the Boston Central Artery. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(8): 966–989
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Wang J H, Xu Z H, Wang W D. Wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(7): 985–994
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Tan Y, Wei B. Observed behaviors of a long and deep excavation constructed by cut-and-cover technique in Shanghai soft clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(1): 69–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Tan Y, Wang D. Structural behaviors of large underground earth-retaining systems in Shanghai I: unpropped circular diaphragm wall. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015a, 29(2): 04014058
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Tan Y, Wang D. Structural behaviors of large underground earth-retaining systems in Shanghai. II: multipropped rectangular diaphragm wall. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015b, 29(2): 04014059
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Shanghai Construction and Management Commission. Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering (DGJ08-37-2002), Shanghai: Jian Zhu Jian Cai Ye Shi Chang Guan Li Zong Zhan, 2002 (in Chinese)
[19]
Xu Y S, Shen S L, Du Y J. Geological and hydrogeological environment in Shanghai with geohazards to construction and maintenance of infrastructures. Engineering Geology, 2009, 109(3-4): 241–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Clough G W, O’Rourke T D. Construction induced movements of in-situ walls. Geotechnical Special publication: Design and performance of earth retaining structures (GSP25), ASCE, Reston, VA, 1990
[21]
Kung G T C, Juang C H, Hsiao E C L, Hashash Y M A. Simplified model for wall deflection and ground-surface settlement caused by braced excavation in clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(6): 731–747
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Liu K X. Three dimensional analysis of deep excavation in soft clay. M.Eng. thesis, National University of Singapore, 1995
[23]
Lee F, Yong K, Quan K, Chee K. Effect of corners in strutted excavations: field monitoring and case histories. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(4): 339–349
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Liu G B, Jiang R J, Ng C, Hong Y. Deformation characteristics of a 38m deep excavation in soft clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(12): 1817–1828
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Peck R B. Deep excavation and tunneling in soft grund. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, 1969, 225–281

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51768065). The field monitoring measurements used in this paper were made available to the writers through the efforts of many organizations and individuals involved with the construction and inspection of the foundation pit of the Shanghai Center project. Special thanks to SGIDI for facilitating access to field data. In addition, the writers would like to acknowledge the support of Ms. Yashuang Bai and Mr. Yuxia Ji for data compilation and figures processing. Any views and opinions expressed in this case study are those of the writers and do not necessarily represent the views of the organizations or other individuals responsible for the design and construction of this project.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6429 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/